Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

jcm

Rossete Neb and Horsehead/Flame neb Taken with WO GT81

Recommended Posts

Just thought I would post a couple of images taken with the new WO 81GT.

The focuser seems easily hold my Atik 460EX/filter Wheel/OAG.

Still having a few problems with the reducer-CCD distance but I'm very close now to

the optimum value. Both images were taken using a 0.8X focal teducer.

1. NGC 2244 (Rosette Neb) 5X8mins Ha and 5X8mins OIII - synthesised green channel.

White stars - no time for RGB.

2. Horsehead and flame Neb 10 X 5mins Ha filter.

Quick processing to get some results quickly.

John

post-415-0-92687300-1388506799_thumb.jpg

post-415-0-57911000-1388506840_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The corners look fairly good to me, have you tried focusing with the 2/3rds focus technique? That might be the thing that helps it towards a flatter field. What have you found the FR > CCD distance to be? And how have you measured it (digitally?).

Looking forward to getting my hands on one of those GT81 scopes sometime next year, but I need to see if there are any potential pitfalls to overcome first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The corners look fairly good to me, have you tried focusing with the 2/3rds focus technique? That might be the thing that helps it towards a flatter field. What have you found the FR > CCD distance to be? And how have you measured it (digitally?).

 

Looking forward to getting my hands on one of those GT81 scopes sometime next year, but I need to see if there are any potential pitfalls to overcome first.

Hi,

I have been focusing on a star about half way between the centre of the image and the corner.

Not sure what the 2/3 rds technique is.

The reducer to CCD distance was about 53/54mm a bit less than the 55/57mm that WO suggest.(digital calipers)

The reducer does not cover a DSLR chip completely.( its not bad but stars in all corners are elongated slightly)

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2/3rds is exactly like what youre doing, but not halfway - a bit further out ;)

Thanks for the info, Hmmm.. 53mm, thats cutting it closer for me (but not impossible). The sales blurb said "covers APS sensors", but you've just stated otherwise - so it puts into doubt whether it will give me perfect stars in the corners of a 383L+ (which is what im after) - hopefully you can get it perfect before long :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2/3rds is exactly like what youre doing, but not halfway - a bit further out ;)

 

Thanks for the info, Hmmm.. 53mm, thats cutting it closer for me (but not impossible). The sales blurb said "covers APS sensors", but you've just stated otherwise - so it puts into doubt whether it will give me perfect stars in the corners of a 383L+ (which is what im after) - hopefully you can get it perfect before long :)

I think the 383L would be OK as it is that bit smaller than a DSLR sensor.

13.5 X 18.2 mm for 383L and 14.8 X 22.2 mm for DSLR

John

Edited by jcm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.