Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_android_vs_ios_winners.thumb.jpg.803608cf7eedd5cfb31eedc3e3f357e9.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I have a chance to buy Lidl style Bresser refractor on this particular EQ mount.

post-15189-0-01380400-1384549662_thumb.j

Does anybody here know exactly what mount it is? Do any of you any experience attaching a simple EQ2 motor drive to it? See below.

post-15189-0-43969400-1384549722.jpg

It seems very sturdy compared to EQ2 so I'm tempted. I know there are probably not the same mounting holes on the Bresser EQ as there are on EQ2, but my hope is that the R/A gear and worm might be of similar size (and ratio) to EQ2, so that the speed of EQ2 motor drive rotation could accomodate it. If so, a little bit of DIYing might be enough. Any thoughts?

Thank you very much.

Edited by assasincz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't offer any advice on this specific mount, but I recently brought one of the Bresser Exos2 mounts, which is effectively a re-badged Meade LXD-75 mount.    This mount was very nicely made and finished and much better than the comparative CG-5 and EQ-5 models I have seen, though the tripod legs were slightly smaller diameter.

I would expect that this is also a Meade mount rebadged for Bresser.   Your one appears to be an EQ2 clone, perhaps the EQ80-A

This one appears to have the same motor mount - http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/attachments/6140059-EQ80-A_Upgrade.pdf

Edited by SnakeyJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I fitted a drive to the same unit....I forget the detail but I'm sure Jarrod (JB80) can supply details. Drop him a PM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skylux 70-700 Lidl supermarket telescope - also known as Skylux 379. The mount is identical to the "Astro-3" mounting.  The mount is similar to the "EQ2" but some parts are on the opposite side.

I bought one of the above several years ago, and it is similar to the "Bresser" model currently being offered from time to time in Lidl stores.

Just to recap, these scopes are a great bargain, as the performance is universally judged to be not bad, and you could spend a lot more money and not necessarily get a better performing scope. The mount is (or was) available separately for more than Lidl charged for the whole kit.

The mount, with its V-block clamp, is not bad, and  the standard V-block will accept all sorts of scopes and cameras so long as you use a V-block adapter (and so long as they're not too big and heavy)

The weak point of the scope itself is the eyepieces - these are Kellners (a more or less obsolete design) and not great. General opinion is that it's worth replacing them with better quality eyepieces like Plossls. Eyepieces are the bog-standard 1 1/4" size, so any 1 1/4" eyepiece will work.  I tried a 20mm Plossl and it was a definite improvement.  (I also tried a 10X/22mm widefield microscope eyepiece of 30mm fit, and it went in the focusser and worked great.) 

Unfortunately, a set of good eyepieces could cost more than you paid for the kit in the first place, unless bought at a discount.

Electric drive? I searched all over for any information on a suitable electric drive for my scope, and found frustratingly little, considering that lorryloads of these scopes have been sold all over Europe.

Here's what I have been able to find out. The mount is identical to the "Astro 3", but the only commonly available drives are for the "EQ2" mount which is slighly different (some bits on opposite side. )  I took a chance and ordered a "Sky-Watcher RA Single-Axis Motor Drive" (economy version) for £29.99.  This is an all-in-one box (recognisable in photos) that takes a 9v PP3 battery (not supplied). To mount it, I took off the RA slow-motion flex drive and attached the drive box to the shaft via its semi-flex coupling. 

I had to make up a slotted angle bracket to secure the drive's mounting bracket to the Astro 3 mount, using one of the worm drive housing screws, and a 4mm nut, bolt and washer.  (I think another poster used duct tape).

To fit the battery, unscrew the two black knobs on the face of the  box (the instructions don't tell you this).  Other poster says the battery should last 13 hours.  The motor is quite noisy.  

Yes it does work - but I had to switch the direction to "S".  The speed adjustment (analog) is quite wide, so don't worry about your worm drive not having the right number of teeth. You can't use the hand slow motion with the motor engaged.

The more expensive Sky-watcher EQ2 drive? (with separate battery box and handset) So far as I can figure, it mounts in an entirely different way, using the pivot stud, cam and gear on the side of the (EQ2) mounting.  So depending on the detail of your mounting, you might, or might not, be able to attach it without doing some mechanical engineering. 

Final note - the Lidl mount is filled with very thick Chinese grease (intended to disguise the play in a mass-produced budget mount). If you strip down the mounting (taking care to note where all the spacers go - instructions on Web) and clean the worms and gearwheels with white spirit, and regrease with regular car grease, it'll work a lot better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By muddy
      SOLD
      Skywatcher HEQ5PRO Tripod and Extension pillar.
      There are a few marks on the tripod legs but not really noticable, the eyepioece/spreader tray has paint flaking off
      But could be cleaned and repainted, it didnt bother me, but I am lazy.
      I am selling as its not getting used as it should be and I find I use the excuse that it takes to long to carry it out 
      and setup, but in reality I think I am just losing interest.
      As it is a heavy object collection from TS25 (Hartlepool) is preferred.
      But if a courier collection service is available buyer pays the costs and arranges pickup I am happy as long as money has been transfered. Also I am prepared to travel a reasonable distance to meet for exchange.
      Price £400 ONO I will not split
       
      SALE COMPLETED







    • By GiovanniF
      Hi to everyone, I used to do some astrophotography in the past with a Celestron AVX and DSLR but after few month had to give up for several reasons, including light pollution (I'm living in zone 3 east London), and also working shifts. Now I want to start again, and this time more serious. I've been searching around for a couple of months to choose all the gear and I'm quite happy with the list so far although it's a bit over the price I planned at first.
       I will get an William optics Z73 with his 50mm guide scope, a flattener/reducer 0.8, light pollution filter IDAS D2 and as camera I will use a Canon 600D modded and I will buy a ZWO 183MC Pro, after so much research, I'm very happy with the scale and framing I will get with this combo, but I'm starting to get confused with the mount.
      My first idea was to go for an HEQ5 Pro, as my previous experience with the AVX has been awful, then I realized that the FLO, sells that mount with belt modification and also some cleaning and tuning if required, I heard that it's a big improvement over the stock one and the price it's ok, but another important factor for me it's portability. Unfortunately, my garden doesn't allow me to do much so I will need to carry around on trolley, for a km walk, I'm a strong person and been doing plenty of time with the AVX, so my confusion came recently when the iOptron mounts entered my radar. I start comparing the heq5 pro with belt, with the iOptron cem25EC and the CEM40 without encoders, and I'm so unsure of which to buy, the cem25 seem to be the equivalent of heq5 at least speaking of payload, but in some threads I read people saying it's a bit fragile so kind of remove it from the equation although the weight it's interesting for my situation, then the cem40, seem to be quite similar on weight to the heq5 but with higher payload and that's interesting too as I will buy a C11 at some point.
      Now it will all come down to the accuracy of tracking I guess, how the heq5 and cem40 would compare on tracking and guiding? If the cem40 it's better, I would probably go with that since it holds more and would last longer as I don't plan to get anything bigger than a C11, but if the skywatcher it's better, I could decide to go for that, and when I move to a place with better garden then get a second mount with higher payload.
      Apologise for the long post and my english.
      Kind Regards,
      Giovanni. 
    • By Piero
      I'm currently on my annual leave in Italy and the sky has been clear all day with no air turbulence.
      The telescope is out - of course - and I managed a session before dinner.
      I thought about sharing some photos taken with my phone and a couple of sketches.
       


       



       
       
       
    • By MarsG76
      Jupiter imaged on 17 August 2019 using a C8 SCT, Skyris 618C at f33.
    • By MarsG76
      Hello All,
      Sharing with you my best images of Jupiter and Saturn for this year.
      I haven't had the luck of a High Pressure system with no wind speed yet, but on the 17th it was as close as I had for planetary this Jupiter/Saturn season.
      Not my best images of the gas giants ever but ok IMO.
      I'm happy to see that the GRS seems to be repairing itself, last time I imaged Jupiter, the border around the GRS looked like it was breaking up so perhaps it'll be around long enough for my kids to see in the eyepiece.
      Captured at f33. Images consist of  the best 15% frames from 13x60sec @ 60fps for Jupiter and 13x120s @ 30fps for Saturn, derotated in WinJupos.
      Clear Skies,
      MG
       


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.