Purplehayze104 Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Hi SGLjust wanted to ask if anyone could point me in the direction of a CCD camera that would be good for starting out imaging havnt a great budget but advice on bang for buck would be appreciatedthanksclear skies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riklaunim Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 What you want to photograph with it? Planetary imaging needs different cameras than deep space objects imaging (and different equipment/accessories too). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red dwalf Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 really depends on what you want to do, for Planetary imaging i`d go for a philips webcam, fairly cheap second hand for £50-£70, may be less if your lucky.great for planets and the Moon as they have fast "ish" frame rates and you`ll get reasonable results, good results if your lucky enough to have little light polluted skies.for deep sky stuff you could go for a canon camera, cheap and can be used for every day pictures also or go for a Atik 16ic or Titan, Mono give slightly better results but then you`ll need to purchase filters later.second hand 16ic around £200 or the Titan around the £300-£400 price range.reconditioned Canon 1100d cameras can be bought for £265 modded and have a nice big chip compaired to the Atik`s very small chip.there`s lots of pros and cons for both so it really comes down to budget. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purplehayze104 Posted October 4, 2013 Author Share Posted October 4, 2013 arh yes sorry that info would of been handy I was looking more towards DSO's than planetary, I have a Nikon dslr at the moment but was thinking of a more dedicated one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swag72 Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 One of the great entry level CCD's is one of the Sony 285 chips. There's a number of different incarnations out there, there's an Atik 16HR for example, or an Artemis 285, or the very well considered Atik 314L+. But be warned, the chip size on these CCD's are massively different to your DSLR.Have you also considered whether you want a mono or colour CCD? You've narrowed it down to DSO imaging, how is your light pollution for example as a mono with narrowband filters will work well. Of course if you have a mono CCD then you also need to add in the price of a filter wheel and also filters.If you want larger chips the QHY8 is often looked at. This is a colour (OSC) CCD, but none of them are cheap I'm afraid. Although you could pick up a second hand older 285 chip for a few hundred ££'s.Bear in mind that many DSOs are big and so you will be looking at mosaics with the small chip - Are you up for that?Another thing to consider perhaps is modding your existing DSLR - This will make it much more sensitive for astro use.There's a few things to consider there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reeny Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 Amazon have a CCD camera at a bargain basement price of £43.Search for - orion starshoot imagerIt's on my wish list as a cheapy gadet, rather than a serious tool.The negative Amazon reviews appear to be from a few people who can't set up the focus, the scope, the maginification, or operate the software correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grotemobile Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 http://www.opticstar.com/Run/Astronomy/Astro-Imagers-Opticstar.asp?p=0_10_0_50This site might be ofinterest to youSteve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riklaunim Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 Opticstar cameras aren' the best thing you could pick. Including community / troubleshooting it will be even worse. Those are odd 12/14 bit "lab" cameras made by Tucsen (and maybe by some other Chinese vendors). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete_l Posted October 4, 2013 Share Posted October 4, 2013 arh yes sorry that info would of been handy I was looking more towards DSO's than planetary, I have a Nikon dslr at the moment but was thinking of a more dedicated one.Have you considered all the accessories you'll need above and beyond? Apart from a CCD, you'll also have to dive in to tracking whatever you're imaging which will be an extra cost.However, if your heart is set on buying a CCD, I'd suggest having a look at a QHY5 (or one of its newer incarnations). It's a few £hundred but can be used later as a guide-cam if you want to go further with guided CCD imaging. If you choose not to, there's always a s/h market for cameras like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valefor Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 Sorry to hijack this old post but as an extension of the op. If given the choice. Would ppl buy a atik 16ic-s, sx mx716 or mx916, qhy6 or something else around the £200 mark. Btw im after a cooled mono. I have skywatchers ed80 mak150 and 250p newt wanting to do dso's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cornelius Varley Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 On 04/10/2013 at 14:28, Reeny said: Amazon have a CCD camera at a bargain basement price of £43. Search for - orion starshoot imager It's on my wish list as a cheapy gadet, rather than a serious tool. The negative Amazon reviews appear to be from a few people who can't set up the focus, the scope, the maginification, or operate the software correctly. The Orion Starshoot SSI doesn't have a CCD sensor, only a CMOs and is not a DSO imaging device. The OP already has a better planetary camera than the SSSI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uranium235 Posted July 14, 2016 Share Posted July 14, 2016 As already stated by Sara, get the Atik 314 - I consider that to be the best entry level CCD there is. Anything less is a false economy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valefor Posted July 14, 2016 Share Posted July 14, 2016 But you cant get one for 200. Thats why i asked whats the best sub 200 mono ccd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swag72 Posted July 14, 2016 Share Posted July 14, 2016 Have you considered that it may be best to save up some more money and get the best entry level camera for the job? I would wait for a second hand 314L+ to come up for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted July 14, 2016 Share Posted July 14, 2016 As well as the 314L there is its predecessor, the 16HR. This will take exactly the same photographs. The 314L has set point cooling, which is not really needed on this chip, and the download time is faster - but that is hardly a game changer. It's just a minor convenience. Honestly I would not be inclined to go below that. The chips are sooo small. Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gina Posted July 14, 2016 Share Posted July 14, 2016 I agree with Sara and Olly I haven't used the 16HR but I did use the 314L+ and found it amazing. You really do need to save up for something decent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightster Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 If budget is a deciding factor you may want to look at the new cooled ASI 1600's. They are CMOS vs CCD chips but with the cooling and their price they should be on your research list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.