Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Superdavo

First Light For My New Explorer 200p, And UHC Filter

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone!

I was lucky enough to get a clear night last night, and have the first chance to test out my new Explorer 200p.

Some of you may remember me posting a topic about how people lift such heavy things, and I got a huge amount of replies. In the end, I decided to split the scope into four parts:

1. Tube

2. Counterweights - to lighten the load as I move the mount

3, Accessory tray - So I could fold the tripod legs in

4. Mount + Tripod

In the end, it took me about 15-20 minutes to set everything up, then I had to wait about 20 minutes for the sky to darken. In that time, I looked for an iridium flare, which the iflares app predicted. In the end, it never happened (Though I saw one at Magnitude 0 later on).

Because it was nowhere near dark, I just pointed the scope at Vega. After that, I took a look at Albireo, looking as colourful as ever.

I then looked for the double-double, but I struggled to split it - possibly because of seeing.

After that, it became sufficiently dark to start DSO hunting. My first target was the Ring Nebula. I'd seen it with my old 150, but it was quite hard to spot. With the 200p, it jumped out at me! I added more zoom, and the nebula filter, and the ring shape was clear as day!

My next target was M13, an old favourite. It was easy to see, with a somewhat mottled surface at low zoom, but when I cranked up the power, the stars were easy to see - much more so than in my old 150.

After that, I looked at the Andromeda galaxy. It was a lot lower down, in hazy sky, so it looked little more than a hazy blob. Hopefully, it should be better when it's better placed in the autumn.

Finally, I found the dumbbell. It was easy to see at low power, without the filter, but when I zoomed in, and added in the filter, it showed some good detail. However, even with all this, the dumbbell shape was still quite subtle. Still, even in photos, it's not as contrasty as the Ring.

After that, it was getting on for eleven, and if I was up any later, my parents would kill me (not literally of course), so I came in. It took me about half an hour to bring my scope back in, and in that time, I let a couple of large moths in.

Overall, it was certainly a good first observing session with my new scope!

Thanks everyone for the advice you've given me with carrying my scope, as well as other things!

David

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, if anyone has other DSOs they'd recommend, it'd be quite helpful to know - as I don't know of many other things to see in the summer (Note: I won't be able to see anything in the Sagittarius/Scorpius region as it's too low for me :sad:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi David

I find the dumbbell shape easier without a filter. With a filter you start to pick up the faint rugby ball shaped envelope surrounding the dumbbell and contrast for the shape gets a bit lost.

I tend to observe the dumbbell shape first, then, add the filter to start checking out the structure within the nebula itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good collection of targets you hit there. Much better than my last session where I managed to find the worst spot ever and injure my hand in the process. Really giving me second thoughts as to swap my 150 for something larger for visual and a frac for AP. Keep it up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I make out the ring nebula with the 80ED? Kind of lazy to take the C11 out tonight, and I'll just settle with a portable kit...just wanna make sure it's worth it :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Emad,I can see this object well with my 90mm so the 80mm should be no problem.Even in light skies it is easy to see,but in these conditions I up the mag,exit pupil of 1-1.5mm.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By AstroRuz
      In what was my final image with the Optolong L-eXtreme filter before I had to send it back to FLO, I turned it over to Cassiopeia. I knew that the Lobster Claw nebula was hiding there somewhere by using Telescopius and framing it that way (since it doesn't show in Stellarium). I realised that with the field of view achieved by the 80ED, reducer and 071mc Pro I could fit no less than 4, possibly 5 or even 6 DSOs in one frame. I love this part of the night sky. 
      The final image is composed of 31 x 300 second exposures, gain 95 at -5c. I ended up using the wrong dark frames by accident to calibrate it, and in all honesty I was too lazy to go shoot the right dark frames and re-edit it. So I just cropped out any nasty parts and edited it as normal. Not great practice I know but I really didn't get enough time with this target anyway.
      Either way I'm sharing the result and I hope you enjoy it!
      Clear skies all, keep looking up & keep them cameras clicking
       

    • By endlessky
      I would like to share my first picture ever posted and the first real picture captured with my Tecnosky 80/480 APO FPL53 Triplet OWL Series (not counting the test shots for "first light").
      This is IC 1805, also known as the Heart Nebula, taken over 4 nights, under my Bortle 5 home sky.
      Total integration time: 8h 52m 20s.
      Here are the acquisition details:
      Mount: Sky-Watcher NEQ6 Pro
      Telescope: Tecnosky 80/480 APO FPL53 Triplet OWL Series
      Camera: D5300 astromodified
      Reducer/flattener: Tecnosky 4 elements, 0.8x
      Guide-scope: Artesky UltraGuide 60mm f/4
      Guide-camera: ZWO ASI 224MC
      2020/10/07: Number of subs/Exposure time: 1@60s + 80@90s. Notes: No filter, Moon 70% illuminated
      2020/10/13: Number of subs/Exposure time: 2@60s + 11@180s + 1@200s + 12@240s. Notes: L-Pro filter, no Moon
      2020/10/27: Number of subs/Exposure time: 59@180s + 1@240s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 88% illuminated
      2020/10/28: Number of subs/Exposure time: 48@180s. Notes: L-Pro filter, Moon 93% illuminated
      Total exposure time: 31940s = 8h 52m 20s.
      Pre and post-processing: PixInsight 1.8.8-6.
      Unfortunately, the best out of the 4 sessions (no Moon and L-Pro filter) was also the shortest one. But, after waiting for 5 months for my telescope, I couldn't pass up the few clear skies opportunities I got since it arrived, Moon or no Moon.

      Here's a link to the full resolution image: Heart Nebula (IC 1805)
      Thanks for looking and commenting!
    • By A_D05
      So I am fairly new to the hobby, what I mean is I have a Celestron Astromaster 114 right now but its hard to use because of the non computerized equatorial mount as well as the red dot sight is bad. I am mainly interested in looking at DSO’s because they seem very interesting. My question is should i get a refractor or sct for observing dso’s and sometimes planets? I want a computerized one with tracking so I don’t have to take a long time finding nebulae and galaxies. Also, is there a certain type of filter to see color on nebula when not using eaa and just viewing with your eyes? I am looking to spend between $600-900
      thanks, 
      drew
    • By StarFiveSky
      Hi, I recently looked into telescope's & dso's again due to an interesting sight in the night sky 😉. 
      I wanted to get into telescope's etc... but my budget and other things got in the way. 
      This time there's no budget limit (that doesn't mean I'm bill Gates though).
      My main concern is size since I will carry the telescope with my bare hands (bag).
      I don't have a local astronomy club or telescope shop around so I don't know if an 8" Newtonian is too bulky/big. 
      Can someone post comparison pictures, if you have an 8" telescope (preferably newtonian, width and length)?
      Secondly I want to see dso's in the future (firstly beginner objects etc...) so the 8" is more adequate than the 6", but if an 8" is too big then I am okay with a 6" as long as it's much more portable. 
    • By Mostafa
      I was wondering what images of dso I could get with this setup. How and how much would my images improve if I added in a decent file flattened and what would happen if I exceeded the maximum telescope magnification with Barlow lens.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.