Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

Grinde

Finally, first light for the AG12: M81 / M82 + IFN

Recommended Posts

Hi guys!

I've finally decided it's time to stop playing with the data from my AG12 first light and come up with a final result from the processing. The AG12 from Orion Optics UK is a carbon fibre newtonian astrograph. With 300mm aperture, and a blazing fast focal ratio of f/3.8, it really gives an interesting match to my QSI 583, landing at an image-scale of 0.98 arcsec/pixel, and still superfast so no need to bin(yuck) the camera to achieve the desired pixelscale and speed.

This gives me really high resolution and still a relatively wide field of view compared to other rigs sporting this resolution.

Unfortunately I wasn't able to drive out to the obsy & give the scope the collimation and ccd/corrector-distance tuning needed due to a knee-injury, but it performed quite fine even though the ccd/corrector spacing was off with 4-5mm (!)

One of my main goals with this image was to try to lure out the überfaint IFN (Integrated Flux Nebulae) lurking in the background between these two famous galaxies (sidenote: the IFN is in our galaxy).

I found it very difficult to reach a natural balance between mega-stretched background IFN and more realistic stretch of the galaxies, so I ended up with two versions, one where I held back on the background to give the whole image the kind of look I prefer in images, and one version where I stretched away, the disney-version. And of course, annotated versions of 'em both.

The Scope:

Orion Optics AG12

Aperture: 12"

Focal lenght: 1140mm

Focal ratio: f/3.8

Imaging scale: 0.98" / pixel together with my QSI 583

The Mount:

10 Micron GM 2000 HPS

All subs unguided

The Camera:

QSI 583 wsg (with 8-position filterwheel upgrade)

Filters: Astrodon

The Subs (unguided):

Lum: 41 * 5 min

RGB: 11 * 5 min each channel

Ha: 12 * 10 min

Click images for full-res version:

9036964604_286fde922e_b.jpg

Click images for full-res version:

9036963988_663c877306_b.jpg

And the annotated ones:

9036965014_c420b3d830_z.jpg

9036964318_516606a667_z.jpg

Hope you enjoyed the first look, I can't wait to try the scope out with the correct tuning!

Best Regards

Jonas Grinde

  • Like 14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:eek: holy cow !!!!

the fact its unguided makes it even better! freak'n awesome!

Edited by Daniel-K

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You must be VERY happy indeed with this set up, Grinde - I know I would be! Excellent processing too... :icon_salut:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice, the AG12 and QSI combination looks set to deliver some stunning results - please keep posting!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of this world! :):D Fabulous! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply stunning.

If they are not seen on the cover of an astro magazine I will eat my hat.

Well I haven't got a hat. But I will eat something.

I should imagine one very happy AP12 owner.

cheers

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outstanding and un-guided!! I think i prefer the IFN versions, even though they all look awesome!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic images and plenty of flux going on there !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow indeed. theses are great. i'd be well chuffed if i had anything near as good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a beauty!!!

Your set up is very weel tunned, remarquable star shapes for a f/3.8 system :)

Love the processing, very clean and very natural, about streching the IFN, have you seen this tutorial, maybe it works well for this image: http://www.astronomersdoitinthedark.com/DSLR-LLRGB-Tutorial/12-ScreenMaskInvert/12-ScreenMaskInvert.html

This is a DSLR worflow but it can also be taken with a CCD :)

Congrats on such a fine image,

Bye,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bravo.. !

Has to be the best M81 / M82 posted on here, a reall treat to look at..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Super image Jonas, looks better than when you showed me it on the ipad. Smooth and colourful. Good luck with the observatory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Galaxyfaraway
      This is maybe my 3rd attempt at a galaxy and I am trying to figure out the best way of doing it since I live in a red zone of London suburbs.
      I took this over 2 nights (well, 1.5 really, as my guiding wasn't working and plate solver wouldn't comply after meridian flip...) with my 8" EdgeHD SCT with 0.7x reducer and Atik 490X. Around 20 Luminance subs at 10 mins each  (1x1) and around 15 RGB subs at 5 mins each, but binned 2x2. I use Astrodon filters but also have an LP filter permanently in my image train. 
      Question: should I only use RGB and create a synthetic L channel, given LP, or continue trying with the actual luminance? Gradients are horrible with luminance but RGB doesn't have as much detail (only red filter seems to be more sensitive).
      My stars are all over the place (colours pop out everywhere, in the wrong way), how can I control this better?
      Also, as I wrote, the red filter seems to have much more detail than the rest and when I add all the channels into PS, the red colour just overpowers everything (and in general, how can I keep the star colours as they are and not have the red and blue go crazy - I am not sure the name for it, but it looks like chromatic aberration on steroids).
      Any other general tips would be great...
      Thank in advance. GFA
      PS: I cheated with the core: just changed the temperature to make it look a bit more glowy; for some reason, I barely had any yellow colour from the data...I will post stacked images, if of interest.
       
       
    • By Xiga
      Hey guys
      So with no new data at hand (or on the horizon it would seem) i decided to go back and re-process my short stack of M81 & M82, being the glutton for punishment that i am! The last time i re-processed this was about a year ago, so i was curious to see if i could get any more out of it. 
      It's hideously low on data (nothing new there!), this is just 9 x 600s of colour (with an IDAS-D1) together with 7 x 1200s of Ha (which i only used to Lighten the Reds in the Ha jets of M82 and the small spiral regions of M81). AstroPixelProcessor used for stacking and gradient reduction, and PS for everything else. 
      I mistakenly shot the colour at ISO 800, instead of the usual 200 i always use. A mistake i imagine every DSLR user has made before! And i have to say i really noticed it during processing. There was noticeably less colour in the stars. 
      That being said, i was still able to bring out more colour in the core of M81 this time. And i think M82 looks a bit better as well, it was definitely over-sharpened before. 
      I really love these targets, but they just make me wish i had more reach! 
      CS!
      Here is the original thread:
       
      And here's the new one, including a cropped version:


    • By Star101
      Disclaimer - My processing skills are at best, average. This thread is by no means a definitive test. Its just my observations.
      I took some long exposures in Narrowband at 600s using the ASI183mm Pro camera and found that sometimes I could eliminate the Amp Glow from the middle right hand side using Darks and Flats and sometimes I could not. No idea why! Any help appreciated.
      I found it easy to remove the glow when imaging at under 120 seconds a sub. This gave me the idea of trying to eliminate amp glow and noise by imaging at short, 10 second exposures, to see the results.
      The one thing I failed to realise is the amount of disk space needed to process 200 x LRGB from a 20Mp camera ? The Registered and Calibrated files where 60Gb each!!
      Processing on a External USB3 disk on a USB3 port on i7 with SSD and 16Gb RAM took best part of an hour. Not counting the restarts due to having other things running or lack of disk space etc.
       
      Here is the result. Slightly cropped as it was taken over several nights and I did move the camera.
      200 x LRGB at 10s
      ZWO ASI 183mm Pro
      TS 65/420 Quadruplet
      Mesu 200
      SGPro, Pixinsight.
       
      Thanks for looking.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.