Jump to content

Banner2.jpg.35fd74882a15b2b8a1b4142f7dcc8bed.jpg

0.5 or f3.3 focal reducer flattener with refractor?


Recommended Posts

hi I currently have a Meade 127ED F7.5 refractor and I am really happy with it. As clear nights have been few and far between, I use a Williams Optics 0.8 FF/reducer. It gives good overall results in imaging the brifgter DSO's etc.

I was toying with the idea of getting a much more aggressive focal reducer like 0.5 or even f3.3 to speed up the photon collecting.

I do not know so much about the specifics of optical theory, but I understand that vignetting may happen and possibly distortion or be unable to achieve focus.

I was hoping this may be minimal as I will using a small CCD chip in the Atik 428EX

has anyone had any experience attempting to use aggressive focal reducers with larger refractors?

as I suppose I am thinking , how far can I push it

I am tempted by a new scope such as the Quattro f4 but funds needed elsewhere

many thanks

Edited by mindburner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a chance for the 3.3, I think. Even in the scopes for which it was intended it will only cover a tiny webcam chip. Add to that the false colour of the 127 (not a bad scope and one I once owned) plus the fact that they are not matched, and I'm sure you'd just get a mess! I also think the 0.5 would be well out of its depth. Your chip, if I'm not mistaken, is a tad under 9mm on the long side? The little 0.5 reducer was, again, aimed at webcam chips.

Note that even Takahashi, at 106mm and not 127mm, only push down as far as F3.6 and that is in a dedicated Petzval costing an absolute fortune. The TeleVue NP127, also prodigiously expensive, is only F5.2 - which is very fast indeed for that kind of aperture in a refractor.

Slow F ratio is part of big refractor life, really. TEC don't do a reducer for the 140 I now use.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi Olly. Thanks for the advice. Yes I though I may have problems and the fact there was so little information on using these reduces with larger refractors was revealing. I suppose if I already had a reducer, it may be worth experimenting with but buying one in the hope of reducing imaging time would be foolish. The 0.8 works pretty well and gives flat stars on the 428EX and even on the DSLR sensor, so I will maybe stick with it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.