Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_2.thumb.jpg.72789c04780d7659f5b63ea05534a956.jpg

MOON Close-up (4000frs) Registax problems


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I captured around 4000 frames in liveview mode while shooting at the Moon, with Camera / 2xBarlow / Telescope. Then cropped them in PIPP and created an AVI file to export after to Registax.

The video file, even after cropped and centered, is not very stable (i guess because it was windy?), u can see the Moon is misplaced in a few frames, but nothing really serious, in my guessing. So, when i pass it to Registax 6, i do the normal process that i already did for saturn and for full lunar disc, (Align, choose a decent amount of align points, limit to 95% quality or best frames, etc). Thing is, the final result is something really odd, with the Moon not even entering the final pic. Somewhere along the alignment points process there is a problem that i dont have the knowledge to solve, and you can see the green lines of alignment going way out of the picture for some reason.

I only had time to printscreen one shot before coming to work, and looks like this: post-23812-0-66407500-1369116564_thumb.p

Some alignment details were, as i remember:

default

minimum number of pix between alignment points - 30

from edge - 20

chose around 100 alignment points automatically (in some cases, there was one in a black area, but i tried right clicking in order to delete it,but it wouldnt do anything)

So, i wonder if i could get any help from you guys! Would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Rui

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rui,

If you do not have the full disc on the image then PIPP cannot help you with the centring of the object.

I am not much of an expert at this type of imaging but I would start by trying to remove all the frames where the moons position has shifted. You can do this by using PIPP to output the video as TIFF images and do the job manually or use VirtualDub to edit the video to remove sections where the moon has moved. This is quite a manual job but I do not know of a way to automate it.

Another approach is to try AS!2 for the stacking - see this guide: http://www.dennisput...ostakkert2.html.

Chers,

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris,

I must say i would expect Registax to collect the alignment points of the frames of the AVI, even though they are quite a few pixels apart in some frames, because there are many clear points of reference for it to do the job... but, in my experience, i only got good clear results at first try when i use a full disc image or a planet and center it before in PIPP.. otherwise, I can't seem to be able to understand registax.

I will give it go later in AS2 and I'll let you know!

Thanks for your comment,

Rui

Link to post
Share on other sites

Registax isn't great if the alignment points are too far apart, though you might be able to configure it to accept them being further apart than it will by default. It also looks like you're stacking every single frame. I'd set it to stack the best 50% at most.

AS!2 is definitely worth a try, but on large images it can get painfully slow.

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi James,

so what would be the parameter that allows Registax to accept a larger distance for alignment points?

And what would be a reasonable limit value for this?

Is there any other way of aligning an AVI that could work? like, if i manually choose, say, 10 manual alignment points that definitely stand out on the picture?

Thank you for commenting! :)

Rui

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick it through Reg 5 , use a single , large align-box centered on a small clear feature near the centre of frame.

Works for me , Reg 6 is far too intolerant , unless you have virtually 'perfect' AVIs it will play merry hell and you'll end up in R 5 or AS!2 anyway , R 5 is much more forgiving . . . :smiley:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without firing up my laptop and starting Registax I'm not sure, but I think in the alignment section it allows you to configure some of the alignment parameters. To be honest, I much prefer to trim out the poorer-quality data to start with as it's more likely to give a good result.

The number of frames to include in the stack is set in the boxes at the bottom left of the alignment section. I rarely stack any frame with a quality level of less than 90% and if that gives me a very large number of frames I keep pushing the quality selector up until I'm stacking no more than 50% of the frames. The only major time I deviate from this is if I don't have that many frames to start with.

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve,

Ill give it a try as well. I guess REG 6 is perfect for centered frames, but, as you say, needs some forgiveness qualities still... :)

Things is I have a single and double speed R.A. motor drive, which means i cant center the Moon for more than 2 minutes with the Barlow setup, due to the moons own orbit, so the movies frames are quite displaced comparing the 1st frame with the last... do the EQ-5 and 6 have a specific speed for moon tracking?

Thank you for your input.

Rui

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve,

Ill give it a try as well. I guess REG 6 is perfect for centered frames, but, as you say, needs some forgiveness qualities still... :)

Things is I have a single and double speed R.A. motor drive, which means i cant center the Moon for more than 2 minutes with the Barlow setup, due to the moons own orbit, so the movies frames are quite displaced comparing the 1st frame with the last... do the EQ-5 and 6 have a specific speed for moon tracking?

Thank you for your input.

Rui

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

Just some update. I transfered the AVI to Registax 5, like Steve suggested, and chose manually 4 alignment points, and it went just smoothly. Stacked around 1998 out of 4000, like James suggested.

Wavelets: channels 1,2 and 3 till half values and some very little sharpenning in Photoshop for my first close-up:

post-23812-0-72442700-1369137382_thumb.p

Thanks a lot for your input. Need to improve now... :)

Rui

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Astrodinsk
      Moon panorama Date: 02/21/2021 Time: 20:12 +03.00 Height: 64 degrees In the constellation Taurus Lit: 69% Telescope: Sky-Watcher 150 / 750PDS Camera: ZWO ASI462MC Mount: Sky-Watcher Heq5 ProSynScan Panorama from 4 fragments Videos for 120 seconds Resolution: 1936x1096 Exposure time: 2ms Gain: 0 73FPS Added 250 frames from 8855 Software: Shooting in FireCapture Build: Autostackert 3.1.4 Wavelets and deconvolution: AstroSurface Panorama: Microsoft ICE Post-processing: Photoshop
    • By Quetzalcoatl72
      Below are consecutive raw pictures if the ring nebula I took with my canon 600da and RCT 8" with neq6 pro guided with sharpcaps polar alignment procedure on the 15th of this month at 1am. I have 20 of these all 1600 iso auto wb 2 minute exposures. The problem will become apparent when you closely examine them, tracking is almost completely broken. I only stacked about 8 of them as most of the frames are unusable, some are star trails, some are commas and some are double exposures. This has become standard and getting worse since I tampered with my mounts gears and backlash adjustment. I have never been able to get consecutive 3min exposures on this mount, and I got it new 6 years ago, and only used it less than 30 times. I have spent roughly 20 hours trying to get rid of the backlash, coffee grinding noise and knocking when I press the directional keys to no avail, when the keys are pressed I notice the image wobbles violently. The go-to is also not working to 100% efficiently, I have to do guess work if I want my image centred.
       










    • By StarPrincess
      Moon Surface 16 April 2021 21:32 Celestron NexStar 6SE ZWO ASI 462mc
    • By CATLUC
      Hello
      No extraordinary images for this lunation, because of the turbulence and the use of infrared filters.
      Here are some images of the 24th, I am working on those of the 25th which will be of the same style.
      Clear skies.
      Luc
      At 75%
      http://www.astrosurf.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/606990e07e8f3_AUSUDDECLAVIUS2403202121H28NEWTON625MMBARLOW4FILTREIR807QHY5III178M75LUCCATHALA.jpg.84cfe5d2e0a96ce7e7a5d85118559cac.jpg
      At 100%
      http://www.astrosurf.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/606990f393159_AUSUDDECLAVIUS2403202121H28NEWTON625MMBARLOW4FILTREIR807QHY5III178M100LUCCATHALA.jpg.948ab38f7bf5022aafa96254aab0f94f.jpg
      AT 75%
      http://www.astrosurf.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/6069910b9dba4_AUSUDDEMORETUS2403202121H35NEWTON625MMBARLOW4FILTREIR807QHY5III178M75LUCCATHALA.jpg.9932feec038a3c6f7bfc2e6b6bd9c953.jpg
      At 100%
      http://www.astrosurf.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/6069912b6a1f9_AUSUDDEMORETUS2403202121H35NEWTON625MMBARLOW4FILTREIR807QHY5III178M100LUCCATHALA.jpg.2aba3bde7986d6a0add4a59b588e734d.jpg
      Copernic
      http://www.astrosurf.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/60699139ebe7a_COPERNIC2403202121H45NEWTON625MMBARLOW4FILTREIR742QHY5III178M80LUCCATHALA.jpg.ecc5f6e628eaf26a6a1881c8e9e378b3.jpg
      Hainzel
      http://www.astrosurf.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/606991429608e_HAINZEL2403202122H05NEWTON625MMBARLOW4FILTREIR742QHY5III178M100LUCCATHALA.jpg.3a4a7bd2926efadfe3cb905a39b6330e.jpg
      Mee and Hainzel
      http://www.astrosurf.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/6069915116dc7_MEEHAINZEL2403202122H09NEWTON625MMBARLOW4FILTREIR742QHY5III178M100LUCCATHALA.jpg.cd5baf564a77c723f2a3c7007c96cce3.jpg
      Pitatus Hesiodus
      http://www.astrosurf.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/60699157ca219_PITATUSHESIODUS2403202121H55NEWTON625MMBARLOW4FILTREIR742QHY5III178M100LUCCATHALA.jpg.fce9a66ae3896ca8800651cb2fb17996.jpg
      Tycho
      http://www.astrosurf.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/60699160f1c1c_TYCHO2403202121H55NEWTON625MMBARLOW4FILTREIR742QHY5III178M100LUCCATHALA.jpg.74cdf87906d385c19a1bd7b46c79519e.jpg
    • By Drifter
      Just a quick enquiry ... was strolling the lunar surface on Iroc and bumped into this area of florescence on the lunar surface.


      Any thoughts anyone? (Co-ordinates at bottom of screenshot if you want to get better definition from original website).
      Was struggling to see clear heavy impact crater that would account for the wide spread of surface debris?
      Didn't think it was image flare - not expert on that so could be wrong - but noticed on RHS there appears to be traces of surface debris scatter?
      It almost seems like someone threw a very low velocity ‘flour bomb’ at the surface of the Moon?🤨
      Have there been mineral studies done on these areas of exceptional lunar florescence? ... I tapped the phrase into SGL’s Search ... but surprisingly it came up with ‘no results’??
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.