centroid Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Another of those little imaged or mentioned DSO's, is IC405 in Auriga. Probably because its not as spectacular as some of the popular ones.However, it was there, so I too it's picture. ED80 + f/6.3 FR - SXVF-H9C and 6x600 sec subs. Guided with the DSI attached to the 12" LX, and PHD guiding software.Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ant Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Nice image Dave, it's not one that I'm familiar with.But it certainly looks like you have a fiar amount of detail. The stars are nice and round. Nice one.Ant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CELESCOPE Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Ah thats come out pretty good Dave , i like the reflection part of this nebula, i see you have fallen i love with PHD ehehehhhe , now i really think 30 min subs would bring a whole lot more out Dave on that one. Hmm heheheh ,Rog master of long exposure imaging Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcm Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Nice image.It also confirms the colours/details in mine. At first I thought I was way off.John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cygnusx1 Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Thats a good shot Dave, lovely colour and full of stars! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinB Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Nicely done Dave. Like Rog I like the blue stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barkis Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 Another pearler there Dave, not so well known, but It's on the map now. Very nice. Ron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steppenwolf Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 That's lovely, Dave great colours and shape of an object I don't think I have seen before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
centroid Posted November 16, 2007 Author Share Posted November 16, 2007 now i really think 30 min subs would bring a whole lot more out Dave on that one. Hmm heheheh ,Rog master of long exposure imaging I think so too Rog . There was originally two more 600 sec subs, but they were ruined by aircraft lights. Now if there had been 2x30 min subs, I'd have probably lost the lot :x.No problem in doing very long subs, but there's just so many satellites and aircraft Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.