Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

Normally I process my raw files through DSS and then Photoshop but I thought I would try to improve my processing techniques using PixInsight

This is a zipped Fits file produced by PixInsight v1.8 RC5 using the BatchPreProcessing script but to be honest I'm not even sure if the Fits file is a. processed through PI correctly and b. if it is, then I'm slightly bemused by the file contents and where to go with it.

The rar file is a 150Mb download and contains a 600Mb Fits file so I fully understand if people shy away from playing with it.

All of the images were shot on my Canon 7D and Canon 600mm f4 prime lens and the raw CR2 files were used. I loaded 30 x 240 second and 30 x 60 second lights, 20 x 240 second and 20 x 60 second darks, 20 x flats and 30 x bias frames into the script and pressed run and the zipped file was the output.

I like to hear from anyone if they have any ideas on the correctness of the processing and what can be achieved with the Fits file.

Using DSS to stack the images, a few PI functions and PS I have got this image from the data

m101_dss_raw_crop_dbe_hist_acsnr_wav_ps.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The fit file shows 2 images of rejected pixels ( hi and low ) and these show to many rejected and you need to run the intergration module on its own with a higher sigma setting :)

The 3 image is your stacked sub , which I just ran DBE-Colour calibration-histogram tran- ACDNR-and a bit os a sat boost

Harry

post-4081-0-98779900-1364421213_thumb.jp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The fit file shows 2 images of rejected pixels ( hi and low ) and these show to many rejected and you need to run the intergration module on its own with a higher sigma setting :)

The 3 image is your stacked sub , which I just ran DBE-Colour calibration-histogram tran- ACDNR-and a bit os a sat boost

Harry

Thank you Harry, that's a good pointer to progress with :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now downloading, something to play with while I wait for the cloud to clear :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now downloading, something to play with while I wait for the cloud to clear :)

Have fun lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a go at rebalancing it a bit by splitting the fit file into separate RGB components (16bit), saving it off, then recombining in PS with noels actions. One thing I noticed is that is very green heavy, a bit unusual as I normally find myself reading the riot act to the red channel instead - HLVG soon sorted the green out anyway.

A bit of high pass filter, then a light touch of NR to finish (just to tidy up the background a bit).

index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=88654

It could be pushed further with the LLRGB method, but I need to prepare in case its clear tonight :)

post-5513-0-43378700-1364501294_thumb.jp

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a go at rebalancing it a bit by splitting the fit file into separate RGB components (16bit), saving it off, then recombining in PS with noels actions. One thing I noticed is that is very green heavy, a bit unusual as I normally find myself reading the riot act to the red channel instead - HLVG soon sorted the green out anyway.

A bit of high pass filter, then a light touch of NR to finish (just to tidy up the background a bit).

It could be pushed further with the LLRGB method, but I need to prepare in case its clear tonight :)

If you want to play with the raw Fits file that PixInsight produced after a pointer from Harry, the 200Mb file is here https://dl.dropbox.c...peCZ1z_S-w&dl=1

my final version is in this thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool, will take a look at that later. I noticed some vertical banding in the red channel, have removed that now:

index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=88656

post-5513-0-36614100-1364502449_thumb.jp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool, will take a look at that later. I noticed some vertical banding in the red channel, have removed that now:

How did you remove the banding?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Noels actions, it can remove vertical or horizontal banding. Its well worth getting, cheap as chips too :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Noels actions, it can remove vertical or horizontal banding. Its well worth getting, cheap as chips too :)

I've got them :) never found that action lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a script in PI to get rid of Canon camera peculiarities too Kev :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a script in PI to get rid of Canon camera peculiarities too Kev :)

Thank you Tim I'll take a look. Is there anything in there to help remove incompetance? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, but plenty to make you feel it :p

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PS, I really like Rob's version above :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PS, I really like Rob's version above :)

me too :) , my final version is here which I'm pleased with

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it turned out to be cloudy! So I worked on this LLRGB version with a layered core:

index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=88657

post-5513-0-73156300-1364514842_thumb.jp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

me too :) , my final version is here which I'm pleased with http://stargazerslou...706-m101-final/

It's nice Kev, but a bit too yellowy perhaps. Rob has the colours about right really. M101 is a great target, more fuzzies than you can shake a stick at!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, it turned out to be cloudy! So I worked on this LLRGB version with a layered core:

index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=88657

thats a bit nice :)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk. Blame Apple for the typos and me for the content

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice work peeps... and as a DSLR user it's great to see what can be achieved albiet with an "exotic" camera lens...

Peter...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

after seeing Robs version maybe my M101-final image isn't so final lol. It's a steep but rewarding learning curve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you did do 99% of the work already Kev :) All it needed was a few tweaks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By EMG
      Recently I bought a ZWO ASI178MM for planetary/lunar/deep-sky imaging and last weekend i had clear skies so I was able to capture videos of the moon in two panels. I have already processed the videos in AutoStakkert, I used 3x drizzle because I intend to print the image so now I have two 120MB TIFF images that i would like to combine in a two panel mosaic. I tried doing it in Hugin, a free panorama stitcher but the program crashes due to the file sizes being too large. I have searched for tutorials on using DynamicAlignment in PixInsight but it seems to me that i'll need a reference image to be able to create mosaics in PixInsight. Is there any way to go about this, I feel like this should be a pretty straightforward job but I am not very experienced in PI so I would really appreciate some advice.
       
      I tried using DynamicAlignment as you can see in the attached screenshot but the result was just a cut version of the target image, aligned perfectly to the source image. It would be perfect if it didn't cut off the lower part of the target image.

    • By kryptonite
      I'm not experienced with LRGB imaging, so thought i'd give it a go on M81. However, when i combine the 4 individually processed integrations i end up with horrible colour hues across the image - they're all aligned and wotnot. Am i running into the issues of light pollution (inside the M25), which i can only remove with aggressive DBE application?  Individual files attached.




    • By kryptonite
      I've got a 5 year old desktop, which i think performs decently and does my Pixinsight processing pretty well. However, i want to change to a laptop for the form-factor, but i don't want to compromise on performance.
      This is my rig: https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/27054387
      What machine do you use and how does it perform with Pixinsight? Any folk familiar with computer hardware able to provide steer on whether i'm due an upgrade?
      Looking to understand how others do their processing.
    • By chriscoles
      Hi, I have taken mono LRGB images of M51 with my new ASI1600mm-PRO.
      I have a mix of 30s, 60s, 120s subs. 100 darks, and 100 flats for each filter. About 4 hours total.
      I Used DSS for alignment and stacking, then Pixinsight for LRGB combination.
      My issue is that i'm not happy with the colours, the stars all appear white and the background is strange.
      I have attached the Aligned LRGB images.
      Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks!

      Green.TIF red.TIF Lum.TIF B.TIF
    • By bencevokoszt
      Hey guys, can you help me with how to fix this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.