Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

Tim

M1 Crab Nebula in Narrowband and Broadband, pushing the limits of mount, camera, and sky...

Recommended Posts

Sometime last year after completing a long session on the Crab Nebula, I turned my C9.25 to it and took a 20 minute Ha exposure at F10. The little bit of detail that came through made a big impression on me, and so I planned a kit upgrade to get a proper image done at that scale.

One C11 EdgeHD and Atik428ex later, here's the result.

My EQ6 is working at its limit, but performing admirably under the pressure of providing a stable platform for a rig running at 2800mm focal length. The resolution is really pushing it too, 0.67 arcsec/pixel, but I wanted to see what the scope could do, so any time there was a clear hour or two, another few subs were added to the total mix.

I've really enjoyed this one, it has kind of made up for a dreadful year of weather and cloudy skies. I have a new reducer on the way for the scope, and possibly a new camera too, so will be looking for some new challenges in 2013.

Full details below, thanks for looking.

Cheers

Tim

Full Size Here

post-1391-0-36130400-1356730647_thumb.jp

Telescope: C11 EdgeHD

Focal Length: 2800mm

F Ratio: F10

Camera: Atik 428ex

Binned: 2x2

Resolution: 0.67 arcsec/pixel

Mount: EQ6

Exposure Details:

Luminance : 38mins

Red: 58mins

Green: 104mins

Blue: 45mins

Ha 7nm: 360mins

Oiii: 785mins

Sii: 325mins

Total Exposure: 23hrs

Data gathered over several weeks Autumn/Winter 2012

Software:

Capture: Nebulosity 3

Guiding: PHD

Stacking & Calibration: DeepSkyStacker (3x Drizzle)

Initial Processing: Pixinsight

Combining: Registar 1.0

Processing: Photoshop CS5

  • Like 14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tim, that is amazing, and imaged at such a high focal length, be extremely proud of that image

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is absolutely stunning. Gives me something to aspire to and something to keep me motivated despite the poor weather this year.

Thanks for posting!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW!! Wonderful - such terrific detail - lovely :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a seriously good image! You must be proud of it and worth every penny and hour taken to get it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An amazing image, the detail is stunning. It always amazes me what people can achieve from their back gardens, well done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pushing the eq6 to unbelievable performance !

great image !

cheers,

Harel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An incredible image of the crab Tim, the high res,version as a lovely 3D look about it. Excellent high focal length work!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff. Proves you can image with long focal lengths on an EQ6 - with a considerable amount of skill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I guess that's OK... nah, just joking, that's a stonking image Tim... :)

James

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't it be nice to be able to make positive suggestions on how to improve on that. All I can think of is to upgrade to an HST !!

Fantastic Tim.

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good image Tim. Hubble-esque and remarkable considering it is through UK skies and at such a high focal length.

Thanks for sharing! Very envyous ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By tooth_dr
      I scrapped all the Oiii and Sii data I previously took during a full moon (about 15 hours worth) and retook it all when the moon was a bit smaller at 76%.  Ha was taken during 98% and 67% moon.  All the lights were taken on the following nights: 12th, 19th and 20th September 2019.
      Integration times, all in 600s subs unbinned:
      Ha = 28.33 hours
      Oiii= = 5.67 hours
      Sii = 5.67 hours
       
      The Ha data is really nice, and unsurprisingly the Oiii and Sii is not as strong (or nice).
      I'm missing that (vital) step in my processing routine of getting the Sii and Oiii properly stretched to match the Ha, before combining.  I dont really know how to deal with the weaker data properly.  Any pointers would be appreciated.
      What I do currently:
      All the data is loaded into APP into separate channels/sessions.
      The data is stacked and registered against the best Ha sub
      This produces individual stacks of Ha, Sii and Oiii that are all registered
      Each channel is processed with DPP in APP and then saved as a 16bit TIFF
      Each is opened in PS
      Stars removed with AA and any remnants removed and tidied up
      I then open a blank RGB document in PS
      I paste Ha into Green, Sii into Red and Oiii into Blue
      Adjust the selective colour settings to get 'Hubble palette'
      Adjust levels, curves, saturation until looks ok
      All the Ha Sii Oiii data is then combined together in a single 'super' stack in APP using quality weighted algorithm to create a 'luminance'
      That luminance layer is adjusted using levels, curves, and NC tools such as local contrast enhancement and deep space noise reduction (using masks to apply as required)
      The luminance is pasted onto the above colour layer, and incrementally added using gaussian blur
      Cropped and saved.
       
       
      Here it is anyway   I haven't intended on any more exposure time for this one, but will consider it, if the expert opinion dictates otherwise!
       
      CS
      Adam
       


    • By Astrofriend
      Hi,
      My EQ6 mount is old now. Very stiff RA and DEC axis, it's time to dismantle it and see how bad the inside is.
      I followed the Astro Baby guide and it was not any big problem to dismantle it. It looks fine inside, I suspect some earlier owner already have done this cleaning and put new grease on. But that must be years ago.
      When I now have dismantled everything, shall I rebuilt it and install timing belt drives? I feel it's a little to much money to put on this old mount. I have to think about it and see what alternatives there are.
      Here is my EQ6 dismantling story:
      http://www.astrofriend.eu/astronomy/projects/project-eq6-dismantling-rebuilding/01-eq6-dismantling-rebuilding.html
      Only first part, now I'm drawing plans.
      /Lars
    • By Anne S
      I'm trying to update my v3 handset prior to selling the mount. I need to update the bootloader from v1.0 to v1.7 before I can upgrade the firmware from 3.12 to the newest version. I've tried following the instructions in the bootloader download but the upgrade loader refuses to install anything.
      Before I realised I needed to update the bootloader, the synscan loader v3.3 just showed 255 255 255 where it should display the handset software, ie 3.12.
      Can anyone advise what I'm doing wrong?
      The handset won't run the mount probably because I had a replacement motor control board a few years ago., I'm guessing. It worked fine before that. I've been using eqMod for years.
      Thanks.
      Anne
    • By chris_33
      I am going to upgrade to the skywatcher 250/1200 pds telescope and i can't decide which mount i should get.
      The main (only) purpose is astrophtography and i am considering either the eq6-r- pro or the cem60
      The cem60 can carry more weight but is also more expensive, my inner debate now is about if it is worth it
      What's you take on it?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.