Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

First webcam image


spectre

Recommended Posts

OK, this is my first webcam image from 12/23. This is a 20 sec video at 60 fps with a Neximage, 2X barlow, and my C-8. Stacked in Registax, best 20% of frames(about 200 ea). The image was 'boiling' during each 20 sec interval. I've seen much better images using a similar setup and I'd really like to get there too. What can I do to improve these images?

Thanks for lookingpost-24153-0-94664300-1356464463_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup - more frames. For Jupiter i generally take 10,000 with my camera at around 60+ fps. If you cut down the size of the imaging area (hopefully you can do that with your camera) the total file size will still be reasonable - mine work out (at an image size of 300px square roughly) to just under 2Gb per .avi. When processing I use 1500-2000 of them depending on the seeing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all. Looks like the consensus is more frames and closer focus. That's kinda what I thought, just looking for confirmation I guess. Jupiter was wandering out of the frame so i think I need better PA before I can go for a longer .avi. This image was also pretty heavily processed with wavelets in Registax, don't know if maybe I went too far?

PIPP?? What's that?

Thanks

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all. I can use all the encouragement I can get. It looks like it will be clear this weekend so I'll be out after more images.

Zakkhogan, this is an older Neximage Solar System imaging camera not the Neximage 5(?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's not a USB 2.0 camera, then 60fps is probably way too much and you will be getting compression artefacts. 10fps would be the maximum you can go. Other than that, just keep doing it until you hit a night of good seeing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Themos and Virgoman, The camera works with my USB 2.0 interface so I think that's OK. I will set it back to 30 fps as recommended in the instructions and see if I get better results.

Also, never think that because it's going to be cloudless that you will be out observing and/or imaging. Since my last post it looks like I've come down with the flu and won't be out this weekend. Similar to the 'new equipment' curse but worse because you have everything you need but can't use it. :BangHead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HI all just to add to what has already been said really, Yes to more frames with the following caviat Jupiter has very fast rotation which can cause bluring if you exceed 3 mins or so. Also the lower the FPS generally the better the quality of the individual frames (less compression better exposure) so really 10FPS is about perfect. that would give you a maximum if all your frames were good of 1800. I would try for 1200-1500 preprocess through PIPP then through registax looking to actually use about half of what was captured. Remember the reason we capture lots of frames is because we are looking to get some really good quality ones in there! Just more frames does not improve the quality, I would take 100 frames with 50 great ones over 1800 frames with 10 medium ones any day and the result would be better.

The good news is Jupiter is really buzzing right now the GRS is very clear as is GRS minor, there is also activity in teh equatorial band and countless storms rolling of the GRS, its a great time to be a planetry photographer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.