Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

Steve Ward

"Running Man" and Messier 42 , Had enough of it for one day ! ! !

Recommended Posts

Been messing with this all afternoon now , have 1.6 zillion versions that all look as bad as each other . . . :p

Tried to find a "reference" shot on-line to give me a guide but couldn't find two alike so I guess it's not just me . . . . :rolleyes:

Result No. 1,335,582 from a stack of 51 x 120 second subs @ ISO 400 + Flats and Darks , very transparent sky but even Jupiter was twinkling so I guess the seeing could have been better , the occasional thin cloud wandered by which cost a few subs but not a sign of dew all night . . .

P1024M42Borednow.png

1000D + ED80 Pro + F/F ( slight crop to get rid of some of the gradient) 51 x 120s @ ISO 400 + Flats + 10 x 120s matched Darks , DSS + Gimp2.8.

Overcooked it somewhat as I've lost all the star colour .

Got to the point where I cannot see the wood for the trees now , let alone where the nebulosity ends and the nasty stuff starts . . . so putting this one to bed for a while . . . my head hurts . . . :Envy:

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve,

It's just color balance is a bit off, you can get RBA plug-in for White Balance.

Should fix it at once.

Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like a nice image to me Steve. I'd agree with mark that it's a little blushish. I guess that's the un-modded camera.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I looks great for what you have. I think you are getting frustrated because you cant pull out as much as you've seen in other pictures and I think the reason is not your processing skills but the fact that you where shooting at iso400. Which is really low. I would suggest shooting at at least iso800. The noise is still pretty low and with enough subs and darks you'll be able to control it much better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a good one be proud of your efforts:) Not many images are perfect and at least some of it is subjective anyway:)

I would also try ISO800-1600 on your next go, I find it works well:)

Edited by starfox

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be able to go to ISO 1600 with these cold nights I would think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As above, it's just managing the colour balance. Try to get the three channels' histograms to line up at the top left of the peak, arrowed on the red channel here. This is from Ps CS3.

levels%20aligning-L.jpg

You won't get the outer dust in short subs.

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be pleased Steve, there is plenty of detail in there even if you haven't got the outer dusty stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.