Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_celestial_motion.thumb.jpg.a9e9349c45f96ed7928eb32f1baf76ed.jpg

Recommended Posts

This is the first such image from my Mewlon. As most may know I have struggled to use the Mewlon from my location, since it need excellent skys to get the most from it. However, I have spent a lot on this telescope and definately want to get more use under my skys with it, therefore, back in October 2012 I modified it with the new corrector baffle system designed to eliminate coma.

The Mewlon is a Dall-kirham cassegain telescope and these have the best on axis optical performance; however, they do have off-axis coma inherrent in their design. The corrector baffle solves this issue and lowers the effective focal length, which is what I was interested in! With the baffle in place the focal ratio drops from F12 to F10, not much change there? But with the new focal reducer it drops to F7, just a little below 2m focal length and thats the change that I was looking for.

This image of the Bubble is taken a F7 using the Mewlon. The coditions were average (Seeing & Transparency) and yet I was able to use the Mewlon!!!

Its not all be pain sailing, I have also had to learn to drift align on the pole. To do this I use Metaguide since its also used to confirm that the collimation of the Mewlon is spot on. Metaguide is actually able to measure the drift and report back the new value after your adjustments, so you know very quickly if you are going in the wrong direction, which is great.

Anyway the image capture was as follows;

Red 8x300sec

Blue 8x300sec

Green 8x300sec

Lum 8x300sec

HA 10x600sec

So about 4.5hours in total, probably I need another night to get the most from the image?

Another important point is at the moment I cannot flat field the Mewlon, I need to build a light box!!! This would also improve the image quality eventually.

I hope you like it? I'm very pleased with the results.

post-3011-0-69800100-1353157580_thumb.jp

Edited by Darth Takahashi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the great comments; from another forum I had the comment that there is a little green haze lurking in the center of the image so I have run the SCNR function in Pixinsight to remove it, here is the result, I think you will agree that it has improved the image? The weather looks to be terrible next week so I don't know when I'm going to be able to finish it?

post-3011-0-91686300-1353229754_thumb.jp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I manage to get a few more hours of H Alpha on the bubble last night before the mist rolled in here in Holland. The weather conditions are making the transparency destinctly average at the moment, so unless I get some clear nights with exceptional transparency I'm calling it quits for now with the bubble.

This image is now approximately 8.5 hours worth of data with 4.5 coming from H Alpha.

Unfortunately, on the second image run I had some rotation between session, therefore, I have had to blend the two successive images together to create the final image that you see here. Can't wait to get my obsy finished.

No flats used, thats not intentional, I just have no way at present to flat field such a large telescope... something for my Christmas list I think! :grin:

post-3011-0-64924600-1353354262_thumb.jp

I hope you like this image as much as I do. I'm very happy in that I now feel that I have a new telescope. I would never have dreamed of using the Mewlon in this manner before the modification. Can't wait to feed it some gallaxies in the spring!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice bubble, and i love the last. This is such a nice object and i cant wait to have another go at it myself.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mewlons sound like difficult beasts to tame but you've managed it. Great looking bubble

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As you know well Martin, imaging with a focal length greater than 1500mm becomes very challenging for lots of reasons, the weather included! The native focal length of the Mewlon is 3000mm which is ideal for planetary imaging but not much else. The original reducer didn't really improve matters either, since it only brought the focal length down to 2500mm. The new corrector baffle already brings the focal length down to 2600mm, a shade over F10 while eliminating off axis coma and give 2 micron stars!!! But the real benefit comes with the new reducer, this take the Mewlon down to F7 or 1750mm focal length, this gives me a much more manageable scope and a very nice image scale for the smaller galaxy's etc...

Take the reducer out and put a barlow in and you have a planetary telescope again... the new system makes it much more versatile overall.

For my part, I have learn't to be a little more patient and to drift align on the pole which is mandatory at these focal lengths... Its a lot easier using short focal length refractors...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A little more saturation with "Match Colour" and "Reduce Noise" with PhotoShop to smooth out the background a little more.

post-3011-0-62687300-1353438708_thumb.jp

Corrected the slight orange colour cast that I brought into the final image by accident...

Edited by Darth Takahashi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MartinB
      This has been a bit of a project.  Last year I worked out that my 200mm Canon F2.8 lens and ASI1600 would frame the whole of the Veil complex quite nicely.  I captured Ha and OIII data for the east and west nebulae with a Tak FSQ 106 and added this into the widefield image.  Although the Tak data had to be shrunk down it did add a bit of extra resolution where it was needed.  
      The difficulty for me has been the processing.  I have found it really difficult to tease out the faint wisps of detail and have tried the usual routines of micro contrast adjustments using curves along with Scott Rosen's Screen blend/mask inversion method but the results weren't great owing to the close proximity of faint and bright nebulosity.  I'd heard about the PI process tool for removing stars, Starnet, so loaded this and had a rare foray into PI.  This proved very helpful.  It was a luminence created from Ha and OIII using the 200mm lens with the Tak data mixed in.  Then the starless layer was added in PS with the screen blend mode at 50% opacity.  The nebulosity detail was so well preserved I didn't need a mask.  After blending I reduced the stars a bit more using the starless layer again and darken as the blend at 50%.  I should really unleash some of the stars to add a bit of "punch" but I've wrestled with this data enough for now!  I plan to use it further as I look deeper into the Gorgon that is PixInsight!
      Telescope: Tak 106 for E and W veils.  Canon 200mmL lens
      Camera: ZWO ASI 1600 pro mono cmos, Gain 150, offset 50
      Filters: Baader 7nm OIII and Ha
      E+W Veil 10x30 mins each channel for each nebula.  Whole complex 50x5mins for each channel
      Captured with SGP, calibrated, aligned and combined with PI, processed mainly with PS but PI for Starnet.  Ha mapped to red and OIII to both blue and green

       
    • By Viktorious
      Time for yet another cry for help when it comes to choosing diagonal. I have read the many similar threads and gathered some knowledge (too many to start linking). I have come some way in my process and now that it is coming to final decisions I would like to hear from the experts. Not many of threads I have read end with the OP returning to deliver some review/verdict of his/her final decision. While I wait for response on some thread where I asked about the result, the eagerness in me forces me to write my own thread. Perhaps some of the people asking these questions before can now answer in my thread as experts!

      I have the Nexstar Evolution 9.25 and am currently using the stock diagonal. My eyepieces are the Baader 8-24 mm zoom and the stock 40 mm Plössl. I would also like to upgrade EPs and there I'm looking at something better in 24 mm range, as well some nice low power for more FOV. I'm following threads about EPs and SCTs with great interest for this (on CN). Can say that I'm currently leaning towards the 1.25" 24 mm ES 68° and 2" 36 mm Hyperion aspheric (if going 2" route).

      I'm thinking 2 alternatives (including a budget alternative for one of them). I'm looking at Baader mainly for ClickLock (and expect good optics):
      Baader T2 Zeiss prism with a 1.25" ClickLock EP (T2 part #08) -OR- the 2" prism with 2" ClickLock (splurging that is). The budget alternative would be to get the non-Zeiss T2 prism instead for the 1.25". Worth noting that I would like to get the Celestron f/6.3 Reducer/Corrector. This would be for future purposes of delving into EAA but of course I would use it visually as well (especially if choosing the T2 route). The reasoning for my alternatives:
      Go for the 2" Zeiss prism to theoretically get the best of the best in visual terms. I would make better use of the 46 mm baffle tube opening. Theoretically possible to combine with the R/C thanks to relative short light path (although not necessarily needed with 2" EPs). Downside of going to 2" accessories would be the cost, EPs, filters etc., on top of diagonal. Would not be able to spend all these costs at once. Cheaper route with T2 prism (especially the non-Zeiss), not only diagonal but also the other accessories. Cost of the R/C would be comparable to e.g. the 36 mm aspheric and give similar power and FOV with the 24 mm ES, i.e. the 24 mm would act as both. Extra plus is the ClickLock clamp for 1.25" with built in fine focusing not involving the mirror. Downside of knowing that not all light coming out of baffle tube is used. To get the wide FOV (24 mm + R/C) I'm adding glass to the optical train (theoretically not a good thing). I'm leaning towards the T2 as it would be a cheaper diagonal and for EPs I would only need the 24 mm and then the reducer instead of a 30-40 mm, so saving the expense of one EP. Then I would already have the reducer for continuing into EAA. The questions I hope the experts here can help with:
      The old reducer vs 2" diagonal question. With R/C and the 24 mm I can get roughly the same mag and FOV as e.g. the 36 mm Hyperion (technically 38 mm vs 36 mm and 68° vs 72°). Also reading good things about the ES 68° and with R/C the EP should behave the same. Am I missing something here? The logics say that the I would lose some contrast with the R/C (not using full opening + adding elements), correct? Possibly flatter fields though (not important now, hopefully the EP threads might tell soon enough). The Zeiss vs non-Zeiss T2? Big differences? I have read a few posts on this so most to get some updated views here (have read that Baader has changed some things over the years). Using the R/C (f/6.3) with these prisms. I know f/7 is mentioned as "the limit" but also remember BillP's test where he was happy down to f/6 with the prisms (in 2014 at least). Perhaps most important: have I missed some other obvious alternative here? Maybe I have forgotten some question here but perhaps for the best as I assume those who have gotten this far are tired of reading now. Thanks for getting here though!

      Thanks,
      Viktor
    • By Nikolas74
      The Lightwave 0.8x focal reducer gives an 0.8x reduction in F-Ratio for faster exposure times, as well as a correspondingly wider field for astro-photography. Designed primarily for refractor telescopes of F6 or longer focal ratios, however also known to work with RC telescopes.
      - Reduces and flattens phtographic field.
      - 38mm Clear aperture
      - Integral T-Ring adapter thread.
      - Requires back-focus of 55mm to CCD Chip.
      - For DSLRs a standard T-Thread adapter of approx. 10mm thickness is required.
      - The standard 2" OD barrel will fit any 2" format telescope like an eyepiece.
      - The base of the 2" OD barrel is threaded for 2" filters.
      - CNC machined body with gloss black anodized finish.
      - Includes a CNC machined T-threaded end-cap to protect against dust on the rear lens element which is more exposed than the front element. A plastic dust cap is included for the 2" OD front barrel.
      Price £90
      Paypal byuer pays the fees
      Postage expenses are on me
      Shipping from Athens Greece
      Thank you, 
      Nikolas.



    • By FileraBe
      Hi,
      sorry if this was already posted, i'm looking for a flattener/reducer for my William Optics Zenithstar 66 SD (already asked WO by email) they reply me that since this product is discontinued over 10 years ago, i need to look for 
      FlatII, FlatIII - with 2"sct thread
      Flat6a with 2"SCT adapter
      and i saw this one https://www.firstlightoptics.com/reducersflatteners/william-optics-adjustable-flat6a-iii-08x-reducer-flattener.html
      and this one https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32917167365.html but i'm not very sure, so i'll ask before buying anything
      i will use it on my recently buyed star adventurer classic (buyed on FLO)

      Thanks in advance
    • By Greg_1920
      Hello, this is my first attempt on NGC 7635 with my skywatcher 250pds on an NEQ6 synscan mount. These are 7min subs stacked to a total exposure of 5 hours taken with my unmodified canon 700d and a skytech cls filter. No coma corrector was used as I haven't gotten one yet. I'm just wondering how I could make my images look clearer when zoomed in and improve them overall as I can see the image gets more blurry when I zoom in onto the bubble, should I use a higher magnification? Do I need to take more darks to get rid of the redness around the image ? Or perhaps I stretched the image too much in Photoshop? I used 10 darks, 60 bias and 60 flat frames. 
      Update: I have now further processed my image with greater care and got a much better result. 
      Thanks 
      Greg
       
       


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.