Jump to content


Jupiter, the semi interesting side @ F22, I think?

Darth Takahashi

Recommended Posts

Last time was the first usable, fairly clear night since my return from my business trip. I had the telescope out imaging 2x planetary DSO (M57 & NGC7662) and left everything running into the night waiting for Jupiter to clear my next door neighbours house.

Everything was ready, the DMK21, IR_filter and my new, well second hand Celestron 2x Ultima barlow. I was a little worried about this test, since in the past I have been using my ExtQ 1.6x with the Mewlon which is of course a very high quality piece of kit from Takahashi. So what could I expect from a Celestron Ultima 2x barlow???


I'm very very impressed by the results so far, see for yourself! The image scale has benefited greatly, the brightness has decreased and I'm now at my camera's maximum sensitivity. Also, I have increased the frame capture to 5000 from 2000 previously. Transparency was average to poor but the seeing was excellent all night. I managed to get 3x runs in before the image faded away as the clouds rolled in. I'm very happy with the result and see it as another step forward in my planetary imaging. Right now I probably don't have the optimum setting that will change with more time and experience with this setup. I more sensitive camera maybe needed, perhaps for Christmas!!!

I still can't quite believe the quality of this rather small compact barlow package, its excellent and I must thank "Neil Phillips" for the recommendation. My WO Barlow was sold long ago and despite its size 2" and 3xED optic element claims couldn't compete with this package from Celestron.

I have never used a Televue barlow or powermate but if I were them I'd be buying these Celestron Ultima up and crushing them, since from a Price v Performance point of view I cannot see a Televue barlow / powermate being that much better, its just not possible!!!

Edited by Darth Takahashi
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to see you liked the barlow, i had a 3x televue barlow ( hard to compare 2x to 3x ) but i prefered the Celestron. Even when i used tubes to increase the 2x celestron, it seemed brighter and sharper. Though the TV was still good. The celestron just seemed to be in another class, First class japanease optics.

The TV 5x powermate though is another thing intirely, and i think it likely to be one of the best multiplyers ever made by anyone. If seeing is good the powermate just seems give what the seeing will allow. No more, no less. it doesnt get in the way. it just gives what the conditions are giving you. I suspect the lower power powermates. Are amazing performers. Money no object i would have more of these multiplyers. But we all know how cheap these are :grin:

Nice image. Good scale

Edited by neil phillips
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the nice comments, I'm certainly very happy with the Celestron 2x Barlow, it's more than enough for me with the Mewlon. I noticed that it has a little thumb screw on it so I can probable more the camera back a little to increase the magnification?

Also, next time I can lower the frame rate to 15 f/s to improve the sensitivity.

Well let wait and see what happens on the next clear night, most probably that's weeks away!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the nice comments, I'm certainly very happy with the Celestron 2x Barlow, it's more than enough for me with the Mewlon. I noticed that it has a little thumb screw on it so I can probable more the camera back a little to increase the magnification?

Also, next time I can lower the frame rate to 15 f/s to improve the sensitivity.

Well let wait and see what happens on the next clear night, most probably that's weeks away!!!

Be wary of going down to 1/15th secs, anything other than superb seeing ( and even then 1/130th secs will likely win ) will produce softer images. 1/15th secs really doesnt have the speed to beat most seeing situations ive found. the low frame rate also doesnt help. though of course less frames will be needed because they are less noisy. Its just ive experimented for many years doing these tests. Ive found even increasing to 1/ 19 th secs Exposure. improves the detail and sharpness of the AVIs compared to 1/15th secs. Try it over a few different nights. You may not agree. But ive found this to be true with my equipment and location.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info that's good advise. I tried 1/15sec last night but Jupiter was jumping around a little too much, therefore, I havent bothered to post the results, its just too soft. Seeing was poor!!!

The good news is that 1/30sec is do able at max gain, I'll just have to get more frames to keep the noise in check. So what the maximum length I can image for without being affected by surface rotation? I thought its 3-4mins?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By SuburbanMak
      Since coming back from hols late August I’ve enjoyed a few back garden planetary sessions on Jupiter & Saturn, due to work & weather though I seem to have missed the nights of best seeing, tonight’s views however have been my best yet. 
      Seeing was mostly steady and contrast seemed really good - not sure but think the proximity of the 95% moon may actually have been helping with this. 
      Saturn looked super with the Cassini division easily apparent around the rings and several cloud bands visible. The shadow of the rings on the planet & vice versa were crisp at the best moments of seeing.  3 moons, 1 always & 2 with averted vision. I fetched my 15 year old son out to look who immediately said “Oh wow there’s a stripe around the rings!”. 
      Jupiter showed many bands and more detail than I’ve yet seen. 2 pronounced dark areas on the upper edge of the Northern equatorial band and lots of swirls and texture in the bands visible at times.  Using a UHC filter I was able to locate the GRS and thereafter able to discern it with the more natural colours rendered by the Baader Neodymium.  Galilean moons clear with diffraction rings. 1 moon to the West and 3 East, 2 of them looking like a fairly close double star. I find the moons the best way to focus as the planet features come and go a bit with the seeing & if I’m not careful I end up twiddling the focuser all the time to no avail. 
      I started the session with a Baader Mk IV zoom but was soon scurrying off inside to fetch the 18mm & 10mm Baader Classic Orthos & 2.25 Barlow which I have found to be a super planetary setup combined with the Neodymium filter which just adds a bit of punch.  
      Best view was with the 18mm Barlowed to 8mm - 167x  by a squeak over the 10mm at 150x.   The Mak 127 was a great tool for the job tonight. 

      Will get back to those Messiers eventually…


    • By Astrodinsk
      Jupiter in the visible range Shooting date: 03.08.21; Capture time 01:21 - 01:22 UT + 3h Visible diameter 48.59 sec. arcs; Magnitude -2.83; Azimuth 191 °; Height 31 °; The illumination of the planet by the Sun is 99.9%; Distance from Earth is 606.926 million km; Telescope: Sky-Watcher 150 / 750PDS Camera: ZWO ASI462MC Accessories: Optolong UV / IR Cut Filter 1.25 " Barlow Lens Televue Powermate 3x Atmospheric dispersion corrector ZWO ADC Mount: Sky-Watcher Heq5 ProSynScan Roller 90 sec; Focal length: 3050mm 66 FPS Exposure: 15ms Gain: 250 (41%) Histogram: 63% Stacked 500 of 5999 frames De-rotation of 13 stacks out of 30 Treatment: PIPP, Autostackert 3, Registax 6, WinJupos, Photoshop
    • By jacko61
      Here's the best of  five 45 second videos taken Monday night with my brand new ASI533MC pro. 1200+ frames captured in ASICAP, stacked in AS!3 and tweaked in Registax. Seeing wasn't too good so I couldn't get it any sharper.  I've since downloaded Sharpcap since it seems to have a lot more capture features than the ZWO offering. Time will tell.  Also forgot to fit my IR cut filter (can you tell it's my first time with a CMOS camera?).  Celestron C8 and 2Xbarlow.

    • By Cloudberry
      Last week I've finally got my Opticron Oregon 15x70 binoculars repaired - they've been collecting dust since March when they took a graceful fall from the tripod. So when the skies opened up yesterday night I was ready - binos on the tripod, window open, sky chart and sketch book at hand.
      And let me tell you - this was one of my best stargazing sessions. What I expected to be a quick glance at the night sky turned into a mind-blowing exploration of the outer Solar System, which until now I've only seen with naked eyes.
      I'm listing the observations below along with the sketch that I made while observing. And by the way, all the underlined words are links, with extra info. Alright, let's get going!
      I saw it as soon as I opened my window - it was hanging in Aquarius, appallingly bright and very physically present. Two things really struck me when looking at it "zoomed in".
      First, I saw four little white dots forming a horizonal line on both sides of Jupiter, as if piercing it. From left to right these were: Europa, Ganimede, Io and Callisto. The first two were both affected by Jupiter's brightness, Ganimede still prominent, being the biggest one of the bunch, and Europa only visible with eyes squinted. 
      And second was that Jupiter was a circle. Up until now all space objects (excluding Sun, Moon and hazy dispersed things) looked like dots to me. Even the bright-red Mars looked like a dot, but Jupiter had a white-yellowish body with an outline! I tell you, I really took my time eyeing this little 140 000km wide circle.
      A little to the East from Jupiter, in Capricornus, was another little dot, which to my absolute bamboozlement resolved into a disk in my binoculars. Like a little sandy-brown UFO it hung among the stars, mesmerising and enchanting. 15x magnification didn't show  me neither the moons of Saturn, nor the separated rings with their coveted Cassini division. But the joined outline of the planet with it's rings looked like what it's meant to be - a planet with rings. And I don't think I will ever forget this celestial pictogram.
      After checking Neptune's visual magnitude, which is 7.9, I started star-hopping left from Jupiter: σ Aqr -> Hydor -> φ Aqr -> 96 Aqr. From there I leaped to three YBS(HR) catalogue stars that were poking right into Neptune. 
      Visually, it was a simple dim dot, akin to myriads of stars that don't have a proper name. But don't get an impression that I was disappointed - I was actually stoked to see it, given that it is the furthest planet from Earth visible with my astronomical equipment. I was however surprised that it lacked colour, which I expected to be much more blue. It was instead white, with a veeeery subtle blue tinge. So subtle in fact, that I would've probably mistaken it for a star if I focused on it by chance. Still, I was happy that I have finally met my childhood's favourite planet, the big blue one. 
      Now this one was a real challenge.
      First, the Moon's yellow waning crescent was quite close to Uranus. It was not as bright as a full Moon, but still somewhat blinding through the binos. Second, Uranus was hanging at a low altitude, where the sky was yellow from city lights. Third, it was by then 4AM and the sun was about to peek above the horizon - it was only two weeks since summer solstice. And the cherry on the cake - noctilucent clouds were scattered all over Aries, where Uranus was located. I was also quite sleepy, but decided to give it a go nevertheless. 
      I tried star hopping eastwards from the Moon, but soon figured out it's really hard to do when you only see one star. So this idea was scrapped. Then I zoomed in on Uranus in the SkySafari app on my phone (no, they don't pay me), used the accelerometer mode to estimate the planet's position in the sky and pointed my binoculars roughly in that direction.
      And now for the good part. In-between noctilucent clouds I somehow noticed a vertical pair of stars: π Ari (below) and 40 Ari (above). They were both at least of apparent magnitude of +5 , which was well within the capability of my 70mm binos, but because of the sky brightness, the stars looked extremely dim. Nevertheless, left of these two I spotted another couple, also vertical and sitting closer to each other: ρ2 and ρ3 Ari. And finally, after getting a reference from the app, I made a leap of faith to the right and there it was - Uranus, with ο Ari sitting just right from it.
      To say I was happy to see the 7th planet would be an understatement. The planet and ο Ari have the same m of ~5.8, but Uranus stood out from the surrounding stars due to it's colder hue.
      But after the whole ordeal, I was not as much affected by the looks of Uranus, as I was by the peaceful perfection of the entire view before me.
      In dawning summer skies, covered with ethereal noctilucent clouds, all planets of the outer Solar System lay in front of me, embodying the boundary between Us and the vast Nothing of the Universe. The birds were welcoming the rising sun and I could finally go bed, feeling so at home here, next to our ☉

      I say all planets of the outer Solar System because Pluto was also there, next to Saturn. Though it's m was +14.3, so I'll have to write about it some other time.
      That night all of the outer planets were aligned in what people call a planet parade.
      You might have noticed the Andromeda Galaxy on my sketch. I observed it too, however the viewing conditions were entirely against anything DSO-related, so it's a topic for another write-up.😉
    • By PGM
      "Takahashi TKP71423 Dovetail male for Mewlon 210 & other Takahashi Tube Holders"
      I purchased it for my Takahashi FC-100DC but went with another solution which works just as well.
      I'm including 2x M8 bolts which are not included with the dovetail.
      Great condition, just a few scratches.
      £40 via PayPal (inc. Registered Airmail from Portugal, usually about 3 days in transit to Europe).

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.