Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

assasincz

Baader Hyperion Zoom Mk.III

Recommended Posts

I have had my Hyperion Zoom Mk.III for quite a while now and I was wondering, if I should review it here, because what there is to say about an eyepiece, really? You just shove it into your focuser and look down the glass end, right? Well, since the Hyperion Zoom is effectively 5 eyepieces in 1 (I don’t really think it’s that big of a deal), it is not really a “static” piece of equipment, and there is lot of “accessory” for it, I thought I’d give it a try.

Optics

Optically, the eyepiece is a “seven element eyepiece, with multi-coated optics for remarkable sharpness, contrast and colour correction.” I am in no way an expert in optics, but I have to say that the quality of the image outperforms my pervious eyepieces, primarily in sharpness and contrast. I even had a 12mm Hyperion normal eyepiece for some time, and when compared, the views through the two were pretty much the same. Even in my F/5 dobsonian, the image distortion at the edge of the field of view is really not bad - though there, I do not really notice it that much; it is only when I zoom out to 24mm focal length that the distortions become really noticeable. There is a shaft, sticking out of the body of the eyepiece, in which the movable part of the zoom mechanism moves in and out, and I simply never get tired of the action-packed zoom action. One problem can arise though, and that is that any imperfections on the surface of the lenses inside the eyepiece can get, due to its zoom nature, visible at some point - that way, I once noticed a quite large piece of dirt inside the optics, which came into focus in 12mm position - this was really bothering me, because it was extremely disturbing, especially when observing the Sun or the Moon. Luckily, somehow, the piece of dirt disappeared (after bumping the EP gently on the table), so there is no need for returning it to the supplier. The piece of dirt did not appear again ever since. It is said that normal eyepieces outperform zoom eyepieces, but I am not so sure. Well, on one hand, you get a narrower field of view, that is true, but the quality of the image delivered (with Hyperion Zoom in particular) is really very good and if you are not traditionalist, or fond of ultra-wide fields of view, this age-old paradigm suddenly gets null and void and a concept of having half a dozen eyepieces suddenly gets, well, stupid. Having one decent Zoom eyepiece just seems more practical. Personally, since I have bought my Hyperion Zoom, I have not felt any need of buying a new eyepiece (for the particular range of magnifications), because it embodies everything I do (and will) need at the moment. Furthermore, the edges of the lenses are apparently blackened, and the EP’s construction allows very little or practically no reflections of brighter objects.

Accessory

The Hyperion Zoom comes with a wide range of “accessory”, if that is the right word; basically you get two different rubber eye cups (I even got a rubber eye shield, but I am not sure if that was part of the package, or a gift from the supplier), and both allow you to use the eyepiece comfortably, even when you are a glasses wearer; the eye relief is generous enough to allow that, though I am sure there are EPs with better eye relief than Hyperion Zoom. Furthermore, you get adapters for both 2” and 1.25” focusers. I personally prefer to use the 2” one with my 300P, because it feels more firm and solid, and the inside of the 2” adapter is “baffled”, which seems nice. One thing that I do not really get is that when you use 2” adapter, you can’t use 1.25” colour filters at the same time. The shaft, in which the movable part of the eyepiece moves in, is of just the right diameter, and it even has a thread on the end of it; but somehow, the boffins at Baader did not think to make it standard 1.25” filter thread, and that is a pity. I think it would be wonderful to have a freedom of filter choice, but that way, you can only use 2” filters with the 2” adapter and 1.25” filters with the 1.25” adapter; too bad. Perhaps, they will address that on Mk.IV. Furthermore, you get a wash of dust covers, just in case you use any of the possible combinations of eye cups and adapters, which means you can easily lose one if you are not careful. The eyepiece also comes with rather elegant leather-ish bag for you to store it in, which I, think is a rather nice touch.

Usage

The most prominent feature of this Zoom eyepiece is its…well…zoom capability. The eyepiece has click stops at 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 mm focal lengths, which means that it can deliver a wide range of magnifications, depending on your telescope’s focal length. I for instance have a 305/1500 dobsonian, which means that I get 62x, 75x, 94x, 125x and 187x magnifications, which is a range good enough for most objects up there. It should be said that the EP’s field of view varies with focal length - basically, the shorter the focal length, the wider the field of view; the longer the focal length, the narrower the field of view (it’s actually 68° FOV with 8mm and 50° FOV with 24mm). Of course you can use any focal length between the click-stop position as well. Furthermore, though advertised, the eyepiece is not perfectly parfocal (meaning that it holds focus at all focal lengths), which means you have to refocus every time you change the EP’s focal length. I know that there are eyepieces with better FOV that are perfectly parfocal, but these can get way more expensive than the Hyperion Zoom. It is fair to say that I have heard that some people find their zoomy Hyperions stuck when it’s freezing out there, and thus the eyepiece needs regreasing. However, I have used mine in temperature below -7°C all night, and although the zoom action felt more stiff, it did not get stuck even a bit, so if there really is a problem with it freezing solid, I reckon it is an effect prominent overtime.

However, the Hyperion Zoom is not that cheap - it costs roughly the same as two fixed focal length Hyperion eyepieces, which is quite a lot, but then, you get a variety of magnifying power in one eyepiece, and it is just great not having to change the eyepieces all the time, every time you want to try different power. One of the best things on this eyepiece comes with it zoom capability - without having to change the eyepieces, you can toy around with magnifications to see which magnification delivers the best contrast on the object you are looking at - this is due to the fact that the contrast of the background often changes with magnification (e.g. when you zoom in, the background gets darker), which means that some dim objects can miraculously pop up, or seem more distinct. There is a slight issue with having to refocus all the time but when you concentrate on some fuzzy blob, you see the change in contrast when you change magnifications, even though the image is not perfectly focused. This gives you an ability of very quickly and easily changing the views through your telescope to see which one fits the situation the best, and I think this is one of the main advantages of any zoom eyepiece.

The eyepiece itself is quite bulky and heavy (when compared to standard 1.25” eyepieces), which on its own is ok - you get a good sense of its build quality and heftiness - but it becomes a problem when you want to use the eyepiece with some more basic, entry level telescopes. For instance, I have a Skywatcher 114/900 with a plastic 1.25” rack-and-pinion focuser and it really struggles with the Hyperion Zoom. The eyepiece is so heavy that it bends the focuser tube this way and that way and upsets the balance of the whole setup considerably. This means that perfect collimation, is, at this point, really unimportant. I have yet to try the eyepiece in my Firstscope 76, but I reckon it will handle the eyepiece a bit better, because its focuser feels slightly more robust.

Upsides

  • “5-in-1” zoom concept
  • No need for eyepiece swapping
  • Zoom ability lets you find the ideal contrast magnification
  • Decent build-quality, big and robust
  • Wide range of accessory (adaptors, eye cups)
  • Good contrast and sharpness, comparable to fixed focal-length Hyperions
  • Smooth zoom action, even in low temperatures
  • Good eye relief
  • Good for afocal projection
  • No inside reflections

Downsides

  • Narrower field of view with low magnifications
  • Inability to use 1.25” filters with 2” adapter
  • More expensive than regular eyepieces
  • Dirt inside the optics can get into focus, which is really annoying
  • Apparently can freeze solid in sub-zero temperatures (not proven)
  • Heavy
  • Not suitable for entry-level telescopes

post-15189-0-59724500-1352115946_thumb.j

post-15189-0-36643100-1352115959_thumb.j

post-15189-0-13687500-1352115970_thumb.j

post-15189-0-42988600-1352115982_thumb.j

post-15189-0-26062600-1352115994_thumb.j

post-15189-0-29182300-1352116007_thumb.j

post-15189-0-81294500-1352116019_thumb.j

post-15189-0-64273000-1352116032_thumb.j

post-15189-0-85096700-1352116067_thumb.j

post-15189-0-78412400-1352116131_thumb.j

post-15189-0-56071200-1352116148_thumb.j

post-15189-0-68482400-1352116166_thumb.j

post-15189-0-38881400-1352116180_thumb.j

post-15189-0-11440900-1352116196_thumb.j

  • Like 14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a great review and some very nice photos to show the product off :smiley:

Thanks very much for posting this.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Took delivery of mine today from FLO - great price, excellent service and delivered to the Isle of Wight in just over 18hrs from order. Nothing beats hands on and this EP and barlow look and feel top notch!

Obviously this has resulted in the usual impenetrable gloom that seems to follow every new astro purchase - but as soon as the clouds part I'll be out testing it. Will try to add a few comments on the 2.25 Zoom Barlow to this thread.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the great review assasincz.

I have had one of these zoom eyepieces for a couple of months and am very pleased with it.

I have hardly used my other (basic) eyepieces since. I am looking into the adapters to allow me to connect a DSLR to it.

Paul.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice detailed review, thanks for taking to time o post it.

I have one as well, only had it out a couple of times, but it works well. Useful addition to the 8SE as a "family viewing setup". Saves messing around with various EP's. My daughter (9 years old) loved being able to zoom in and out, without dad having to change EP's :grin:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and thanks for a very interesting review of the Mk.III. I have been thinking of buying this eyepiece and the associated 2.25 Barlow to attach to my new Celestron C8-SGT via a Baader Steeltrack focuser (as yet unpurchased! ) and was wondering if this sounds like a good combination, any comments on this? Currently I only have a 25mm Plossl and a 1.25" diagonal so anything is going to be an improvement !! I was also wondering if I should think about getting a 2" diagonal due to the weight of the eyepiece.

Any comments gratefully recieved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

The idea of the Baader barlow got me thinking to try my 8-24 MK III and my GSO 2" ED 2X barlow. So just tried it on some terrestrial targets and it seems to work just fine however the field of view get noticeably small, especially at the 8mm setting. Also, since the lens part of that barlow is removable I discovered it screws very smoothly into the 2" nose piece of the zoom for just a bit less magnification but slightly brighter image. There did not seem to be any image degradation other than the expected reduction in brightness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say the Barlow is unnecessary with the C8 ... 8mm end is already 254x without the Barlow. Put the money for the Barlow for a longer focal length 68/70/82 degree design :cool:

Thanks Dunkster, sounds like a good idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

The idea of the Baader barlow got me thinking to try my 8-24 MK III and my GSO 2" ED 2X barlow. So just tried it on some terrestrial targets and it seems to work just fine however the field of view get noticeably small, especially at the 8mm setting. Also, since the lens part of that barlow is removable I discovered it screws very smoothly into the 2" nose piece of the zoom for just a bit less magnification but slightly brighter image. There did not seem to be any image degradation other than the expected reduction in brightness.

actually the f.o.v at 8mm is around 68*, the higher end mags are pretty wide ,its the low powers where it narrows to around 50*

of course you see less sky at 8mm than at 24. but thats happens with any e/p when you magnify an area,perhaps thats what you mean ?

clear skies...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought this eyepiece with the Baader 2.25 Barlow for my 250PX. Great package. My dob is just begging me to add the Steeltrack NT Focuser now..............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well ive only had limited viewing with the hyperion zoom due to the usual uk weather. but my initial thoughts are mixed.

i feel quality when its in your hands ,solid and quite heavy . the click action is spot on,you feel the click so to know where you are on the magnification scale ,but its not overly stiff.

although im quite new to this and only have experience with e/p's under £80 up to now, but feel the zoom gives crisp views ,and had a cracking view of jupiter on its first light.

plus the advantage of finding and viewing on low power ,then moving up through the mags to hit a sweet spot is nice.

so why mixed ? well i so far ( and i admit not long enough to make a decission) i have found the low power 20-24mm just too narrow a field of view. this might be down to being used to the bst explorers and x-cel lx e/p's where i had 60* fov. feels very cloustrophobic at times. thats probably the only reason it might not end up a keeper. i need more time to see if i can perhaps get accustomed to this down side. but i suppose there has to be a downside really or everyone would simply use a zoom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use mine in combination with a 31mm aspheric for that very reason. Anything below 20mm is acceptable, anything above it deserves a wide angle ep. Tbh baader should just limit the upper end to 20mm and claim it to be the perfect zoom, rather than leave that setting on there as the only real gripe that people have with it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use mine in combination with a 31mm aspheric for that very reason. Anything below 20mm is acceptable, anything above it deserves a wide angle ep. Tbh baader should just limit the upper end to 20mm and claim it to be the perfect zoom, rather than leave that setting on there as the only real gripe that people have with it.

thats a good point. i have managed to get hold of a panaview 32mm to use for very low power,only used it once so far for 20 mins or so,and actually found it quite pleasing ,although as warned the outer edge loses its sharpness. not up to the aspheric id guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use mine in combination with a 31mm aspheric for that very reason. Anything below 20mm is acceptable, anything above it deserves a wide angle ep. Tbh baader should just limit the upper end to 20mm and claim it to be the perfect zoom, rather than leave that setting on there as the only real gripe that people have with it.

I do agree with this and use 2" 24 and 32mm EDs for proper widerfield viewing. However, I do find the 24mm zoom is useful for initial finding and alignment, so think it does serve a very useful function at the low end. I had an amazing view of M42 using the Hyperion at 8mm last night, almost filling the FOV and pin sharp and bright with lots of nebulosity and the trapezium very clear. Absolutely my best view of this ever!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent and well written review, it is not the type of eyepiece that I would ever buy but I found it compelling and carried on reading, thank=you for taking the time to write it.

Alan.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great review. Have been looking at 100's of eyepieces over the last week and I am now convinced this is my preferred choice to upgrade the stock ep's that were supplied with my 130p. Bonus being its my birthday in a fortnight and the wife says she'l buy it for me.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought mine the same day I purchased my 5 SE Schmidt Cassegrain. There are a few zooms similar on the market, but once I read the info on the lens, I knew I had to have it. It does very well as an eyepiece, but it does even better with a DSLR camera attached. Yup, the 5 SE can hold the weight of the camera, zoom & misc pieces needed to thread them together. They work great either as a telescope in the night sky using the Go-To mount, or as a terrestrial lens on a heavy camera tripod.

In my opinion, it's worth the little extra money when it's compared to the competition. Many zooms are inferior eye-pieces most people know to avoid, this one is by far the best of the breed, in all respects.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You've got to be impressed with that mount, must be 2-2.5Kg hanging off that focuser. My synta crayford struggles/sags with 1.5Kg, though perhaps some service/adjustment may help :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SnakeyJ; I did adjust the tension of the ny-loc nut that secures the vertical axis gear to the pivot. I did get some droop prior to the adjustment, but now it works just fine. I only increased the tension by a few inch pounds, so the Teflon washers shouldn't wear out any faster then normal. The visual back shown in the picture screws directly to the scope, & it is a simple 2 inch collar that allows for the 2 inch nose piece for the zoom to slip right in. I use the 2 inch nose piece instead of the 1.25 as the weight you mentioned, I feel, would cause a big stress on the 1.25" barrel, risking damage to the zoom eyepiece.

When I am using the zoom as a regular eyepiece for casual viewing, I do use a 2x Barlow with the zoom EP. As long as someone uses a high quality Barlow, it usually will not effect the quality of the EP. I am looking to buy a few 2" power-mates, up to 4x, for photographic purposes. This is my intent, but I am still reading all about the differences & benefits of the Power-mates vs Barlows.

You are correct thinking I touched up the Go-To mount a little to stop the droop. I thought it best to share this info in case others are considering a similar set-up.

Cheers!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SnakeyJ; I did adjust the tension of the ny-loc nut that secures the vertical axis gear to the pivot. I did get some droop prior to the adjustment, but now it works just fine. I only increased the tension by a few inch pounds, so the Teflon washers shouldn't wear out any faster then normal. The visual back shown in the picture screws directly to the scope, & it is a simple 2 inch collar that allows for the 2 inch nose piece for the zoom to slip right in. I use the 2 inch nose piece instead of the 1.25 as the weight you mentioned, I feel, would cause a big stress on the 1.25" barrel, risking damage to the zoom eyepiece.

When I am using the zoom as a regular eyepiece for casual viewing, I do use a 2x Barlow with the zoom EP. As long as someone uses a high quality Barlow, it usually will not effect the quality of the EP. I am looking to buy a few 2" power-mates, up to 4x, for photographic purposes. This is my intent, but I am still reading all about the differences & benefits of the Power-mates vs Barlows.

You are correct thinking I touched up the Go-To mount a little to stop the droop. I thought it best to share this info in case others are considering a similar set-up.

Cheers!

Cheers PaPaDoc, I was genuinely impressed with the build quality but respect your candour on the tweaks - look forward to seeing some of your astro images taken with the 5SE/Hyperion/EOS. It might also be interesting setup for terrestrial photography as well.

Regards - Jake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sold mine recently having decided a while ago that I preferred using separate eyepieces. It worked fine with my Meade ETX 80 though.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By AstroRuz
      As new condition ultra narrowband 1.25" Baader filter. 3.5nm bandpass for nice small stars.
      Bought and loved it, but using a DSLR again and have no use for this filter.
      £140, can post.







    • By chaxastro
      IAS 2019 Review - Friday 15 November
       
      My second show (first was last year), as before got there on Friday 15th, soon after 0900hrs.
       
      Despite the weather, seemed to be fairly busy in the main hall. Had a few good discussions with different vendors, 365 Astronomy in particular. Even the guy on the Vixen stand near the entrance, remembered me from last year!
       
      RVO had a whole hall to themselves, not really sure why? They did seem a bit 'lost' in there. All that space and not much kit...
       
      Again, there to 'window shop' only, but still managed to spend £90! Got a good price on a WO 1.25" Dura-Bright Dielectric diagonal.
      (Thanks Widescreen) Best online price I'd found, prior to the show, was about £100 inc. postage/delivery, so saved a tenner!
       
      Restaurant was a big improvement over last year. Coffee was OK, lunch was pretty good too. Choice of Fish 'n' Chips or Cottage Pie.
      All gone by 1345hrs...
       
      All in all a good day. Looking ahead to 2020, might make three in a row!
       
      Chaxastro
       
      "Humour is reason gone mad" Groucho Marx







    • By Viktorious
      Time for yet another cry for help when it comes to choosing diagonal. I have read the many similar threads and gathered some knowledge (too many to start linking). I have come some way in my process and now that it is coming to final decisions I would like to hear from the experts. Not many of threads I have read end with the OP returning to deliver some review/verdict of his/her final decision. While I wait for response on some thread where I asked about the result, the eagerness in me forces me to write my own thread. Perhaps some of the people asking these questions before can now answer in my thread as experts!

      I have the Nexstar Evolution 9.25 and am currently using the stock diagonal. My eyepieces are the Baader 8-24 mm zoom and the stock 40 mm Plössl. I would also like to upgrade EPs and there I'm looking at something better in 24 mm range, as well some nice low power for more FOV. I'm following threads about EPs and SCTs with great interest for this (on CN). Can say that I'm currently leaning towards the 1.25" 24 mm ES 68° and 2" 36 mm Hyperion aspheric (if going 2" route).

      I'm thinking 2 alternatives (including a budget alternative for one of them). I'm looking at Baader mainly for ClickLock (and expect good optics):
      Baader T2 Zeiss prism with a 1.25" ClickLock EP (T2 part #08) -OR- the 2" prism with 2" ClickLock (splurging that is). The budget alternative would be to get the non-Zeiss T2 prism instead for the 1.25". Worth noting that I would like to get the Celestron f/6.3 Reducer/Corrector. This would be for future purposes of delving into EAA but of course I would use it visually as well (especially if choosing the T2 route). The reasoning for my alternatives:
      Go for the 2" Zeiss prism to theoretically get the best of the best in visual terms. I would make better use of the 46 mm baffle tube opening. Theoretically possible to combine with the R/C thanks to relative short light path (although not necessarily needed with 2" EPs). Downside of going to 2" accessories would be the cost, EPs, filters etc., on top of diagonal. Would not be able to spend all these costs at once. Cheaper route with T2 prism (especially the non-Zeiss), not only diagonal but also the other accessories. Cost of the R/C would be comparable to e.g. the 36 mm aspheric and give similar power and FOV with the 24 mm ES, i.e. the 24 mm would act as both. Extra plus is the ClickLock clamp for 1.25" with built in fine focusing not involving the mirror. Downside of knowing that not all light coming out of baffle tube is used. To get the wide FOV (24 mm + R/C) I'm adding glass to the optical train (theoretically not a good thing). I'm leaning towards the T2 as it would be a cheaper diagonal and for EPs I would only need the 24 mm and then the reducer instead of a 30-40 mm, so saving the expense of one EP. Then I would already have the reducer for continuing into EAA. The questions I hope the experts here can help with:
      The old reducer vs 2" diagonal question. With R/C and the 24 mm I can get roughly the same mag and FOV as e.g. the 36 mm Hyperion (technically 38 mm vs 36 mm and 68° vs 72°). Also reading good things about the ES 68° and with R/C the EP should behave the same. Am I missing something here? The logics say that the I would lose some contrast with the R/C (not using full opening + adding elements), correct? Possibly flatter fields though (not important now, hopefully the EP threads might tell soon enough). The Zeiss vs non-Zeiss T2? Big differences? I have read a few posts on this so most to get some updated views here (have read that Baader has changed some things over the years). Using the R/C (f/6.3) with these prisms. I know f/7 is mentioned as "the limit" but also remember BillP's test where he was happy down to f/6 with the prisms (in 2014 at least). Perhaps most important: have I missed some other obvious alternative here? Maybe I have forgotten some question here but perhaps for the best as I assume those who have gotten this far are tired of reading now. Thanks for getting here though!

      Thanks,
      Viktor
    • By tooth_dr
      I scrapped all the Oiii and Sii data I previously took during a full moon (about 15 hours worth) and retook it all when the moon was a bit smaller at 76%.  Ha was taken during 98% and 67% moon.  All the lights were taken on the following nights: 12th, 19th and 20th September 2019.
      Integration times, all in 600s subs unbinned:
      Ha = 28.33 hours
      Oiii= = 5.67 hours
      Sii = 5.67 hours
       
      The Ha data is really nice, and unsurprisingly the Oiii and Sii is not as strong (or nice).
      I'm missing that (vital) step in my processing routine of getting the Sii and Oiii properly stretched to match the Ha, before combining.  I dont really know how to deal with the weaker data properly.  Any pointers would be appreciated.
      What I do currently:
      All the data is loaded into APP into separate channels/sessions.
      The data is stacked and registered against the best Ha sub
      This produces individual stacks of Ha, Sii and Oiii that are all registered
      Each channel is processed with DPP in APP and then saved as a 16bit TIFF
      Each is opened in PS
      Stars removed with AA and any remnants removed and tidied up
      I then open a blank RGB document in PS
      I paste Ha into Green, Sii into Red and Oiii into Blue
      Adjust the selective colour settings to get 'Hubble palette'
      Adjust levels, curves, saturation until looks ok
      All the Ha Sii Oiii data is then combined together in a single 'super' stack in APP using quality weighted algorithm to create a 'luminance'
      That luminance layer is adjusted using levels, curves, and NC tools such as local contrast enhancement and deep space noise reduction (using masks to apply as required)
      The luminance is pasted onto the above colour layer, and incrementally added using gaussian blur
      Cropped and saved.
       
       
      Here it is anyway   I haven't intended on any more exposure time for this one, but will consider it, if the expert opinion dictates otherwise!
       
      CS
      Adam
       


    • By Ewan
      Not many chances of Solar Imaging this year so far but caught this one.
      AR2741 from the 12th late afternoon
      AZEQ6-GT
      152mm Technosky Refractor @ f5.9
      135mm Baader D-ERF
      Daystar Quark Chromosphere + Eliminator
      PG IMX174
      5862 Frames, 4Ms 30 second capture @ 195Fps 1024 x 768 Mono16
      Best 45% Frames stacked in AS!3, ImPPG then tweaked in PS
      Atb


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.