Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep25_banner.thumb.jpg.9e57eee22cad68fd6b67a87befeaa79b.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi!

I am afraid that I am on the scrounge for information again from the good people of SGL - one day I hope to be able to give back to this forum as much as I am receiving in these early days. But for now I am mainly all take! :icon_redface:

I am starting to look at guiding for my astrophotography having read a few posts here and there about using a webcam as a guide camera. There is no way at the moment I can afford a dedicated guiding system - scope & camera.

I know from reading other posts to questions similar to this that I can use PHD together with EQMOD to run the mount and that you can use a webcam in certain situations as a guide camera.

My question is: do you keep the original lens on the webcam and use it Afocal; or do you take the lens off and direct the light straight onto the chip as you do with imaging with a webcam?

I wanted to try this system with my CG5 Advanced GT (this mount has the auto guide port) to see if the other equipment I have (laptop, power pack etc.) can handle it before I start to spend out on more advanced stuff at some point in the future.

I have a 6x30 finder scope on my C8 but I also have a 20x50 Mirador spotting scope that I thought I could mount on the main tube if that would be better to use as a guide scope. I appreciate that the magnification on the spotting scope is a bit high but I am using what I have got in order to save money! :wink:

I hope to be getting a second hand DSLR soon which I will be using for imaging rather than the Philips SPC900NC which I am using at the moment. The SPC900 could then become my guide cam (if it doesn't need its lens :smiley: ).

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bryan, Quite alot of us use a webcam/finderscope for guiding. The SPC is ideal if modified for long exposure as you will need at least 2 sec exposure. The finder I use is a standard Skywatcher 50mm, the eyepiece is removed and an adapter made to fit the webcam minus it's lens. The objective of the finder can then be screwed in/out to achieve focus.

The 6/30 is abit too small, To be honest the 50mm is ok fov wise but i'm looking upgrade to an 80mm guide scope.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a 9x50 finder scope with a cam attached, the webcan lens is unscrewed and an adapter for the 9x50 is screwed on in place. The rear of the 9x50 is unscrewed and the webcam with adapter is screwed on in place, the front lens is unscrewed and the ring is taken off, lens is replaced, this is to allow focus. Hope this is of help.

Jim

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks! It looks like I will have to try and find a 50mm finder scope. I may have a look at AstroBoot or fleabay, see if I can't pick something up cheap. I am going to NY next month so I may pick-up something there. Hopefully not water damaged stock! :sad:

Good luck to anyone across the pond who is in hurricane Sandy's path. I hope it comes to nothing and turns away or fizzles out!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

I have bought a sky watcher 9x50 finder to use as a finder/guider. Where can i get an adapter for the back. I have a modded Microsoft Live cam and a Logitec 4000 to use as the camera.

Andy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy, if you phone Bernard at Modern Astronomy (0208 7639953) he will put you right, his website has the adapter on there but best chat with him, I think the cost is about £30.

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a 9x50 finder scope with a cam attached, the webcan lens is unscrewed and an adapter for the 9x50 is screwed on in place. The rear of the 9x50 is unscrewed and the webcam with adapter is screwed on in place, the front lens is unscrewed and the ring is taken off, lens is replaced, this is to allow focus. Hope this is of help.

Jim

Hey there Jim,

I'm hoping you can help me with an effort to understand and hopefully use a finderscope/spc900 combo to guide with - I posted a question elsewhere in SGL and got some great info, though the main opinion seems to be the qhy5 guide cam together with the 9x50 finder.

As I have an spc900 and a 9x50 finder and the synscan kit with 'autoguidr' port I was hoping to learn from those who have used similar equipment to guide with.

Would you mind terribly if I pick your brain on the subject at some point?

Regards

Aenima

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey there Jim,

I'm hoping you can help me with an effort to understand and hopefully use a finderscope/spc900 combo to guide with - I posted a question elsewhere in SGL and got some great info, though the main opinion seems to be the qhy5 guide cam together with the 9x50 finder.

As I have an spc900 and a 9x50 finder and the synscan kit with 'autoguidr' port I was hoping to learn from those who have used similar equipment to guide with.

Would you mind terribly if I pick your brain on the subject at some point?

Regards

Aenima

Hi, I belive the main reason why folks advocate the qhy5 is that it does long exposure straight out of the box (and larger sensor?). I use an spc900/50mm finderscope for guiding but unless you do the LX mod on the spc there will be few stars to guide with.

I modded mine and with the 50mm finder, the small fov doesn't give you much choice but I have found stars on most targets with 3-4 sec exposures. Looking forward, I would like to increase the focal length/fov so my choice would be an ST80 with larger sensor.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you John,

I hadnt actually realised at first that the spc900's needed to be LX mods, so thats something I've learned - :)

I would have trouble using anything bigger than the 9x50 for obvious reasons and would probably need to look into other webcams versus biting the QHY5 bullet directly.

If my webcam was modded, for example, what else would be required to attach it to the synscan motorbox? I dont mind whether I use a handset or laptop to control things though prefer to just do guiding with laptop and handset suits me fine but right now tracking is my priority.

Appreciate the input thank you :)

Regards

Aenima

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By JimFR
      I’ve just acquired the above (birthday prezzie!).
      It’s a nice finder, and a definite boost from the 7x30 bundled with the scope!
      However, I’m struggling to get anywhere near focus with my Pentax K50 on the end of it... anyone know why? There’s no focus mechanism to speak of, other than the objective lens’ mounting thread...
    • By Mark Jo
      Hi 
      I have bought a skywatcher MN190 recently as the collimation appears a little off yhink need to collminate, assumed that there would be locking and adjustment screws on the primary but theee are are only 3 assumed adjustment stews, though there are 3 screw holes for locking???
      is this correct???
      or should there be 3 locking Screws and 3 adjustments?
      the included ‘manual’ is useless no information on this. 
       
      cant find much useful info on doing this on MN’s
      assumed Colimation would be more less same as Newtonian- is that correct?
       
       
    • By pete_81
      Hi guys,
      With new mount and upgraded scope features, now looking to venture into imaging.
      Before I start, I'm not looking to get feedback on polar alignment, mono guidecam, better imaging cameras, etc; this is more a 'dummies guide' setup discussion! I'm not expecting to get great images at this stage, just more the options available, getting over some issues, so that I can jump outside on a clear night with an ideal, foolproof(!), setup for either imaging or visual as time would permit and what may work best for me. As you may guess from the topic name, I'm a mac user (Macbook Pro) and would rather keep to this if possible (whilst I do have Windows (and Ubuntu) via parallels, I'd rather not use these).
      I've got a setup which has worked well for visual, and obviously want to have a couple of 'staple' setups that I can use depending on expectations of night observing or imaging. So far, the best one for me has been the Skywatcher Wifi Synscan controller, which has worked a treat with my Android phone - I use the Synscan app to complete alignment and GOTO stars/planets/DSO etc, or Stellarium_plus after completing alignment. This removes the need for the Synscan Handset and any USB cables to the mount altogether. But I don't know if this will work for guiding.
      That then brings me to my issue on mac - connecting USB(A) between Macbook and Handset, I've attempted to control the mount through Stellarium. Trying each of the available connections (/dev/tty.usbsetial-1420, /dev/cu.usbsetial-1420, and just for sake of it, the /dev/tty.Bluetooth-Incoming-Port and /dev/cu.Bluetooth-Incoming-Port) in the dropdown menu under DeviceSettings/SerialPort, I cannot get the mount to connect (well, more like selecting the telescope and clicking the "Start" on the TelescopeControl just results in the spinning icon and I have to Force-Quit Stellarium and start again with the same result each time. Annoyingly (for fellow mac users!), Parallels/Windows/Stellarium connects and controls the mount fine! As the mount is the newer "pro" type, I also have a USB connection directly under the hand-controller RJ45 and AutoGuider ST4 sockets, but using this still results in the same issue. Another issue I have seen is that when I unplug the USB from the computer when connected to the handset, the date on the controller jumps significantly - for example, last night at ~23:30, I was transported through the local wormhole galaxy to Jan 2048 according to Synscan! Obviously unplugging isn't going to happen during a genuine session, but just wondering if this is a possible issue somewhere?!
      Any other mac users connecting USB directly to the SW 'Pro' mounts?
      Software wise, would folks generally suggest steering away from Stellarium towards KStars or SkySafari(Plus) for controlling the mount?
      Can the Wifi dongle be used for controlling mount from computer (any OS) or do I need to go USB either to handset or directly to mount?
      Is there an issue in using Mac USB to the telescope compared to 'straight' Windows (i.e. PC/laptop with Windows instead of virtual)?
      Anyway, back to topic... I've a Nikon DSLR to use for primary camera at this stage, which would be triggered independently from guiding software. PHD2 is my hopeful choice of guiding software (is EKOS with KStars similar?), with T7C guide-camera on 240mm f/4 guidescope, and at this stage, I can confirm PHD2 at least connects to the camera on OS-X. There is an ST4 port on the camera, but having read several topics, I think I want to pulse-guide directly - is this correct or is ST4 best for this setup? This sorta comes back to software and connections - my understanding is one of the following cable setups for guiding (as a minimum) :
      Guiding-camera => USB(A) => Macbook => PHD2 => USB(A) => SynscanHandset => AZEQ6
      Guiding-camera => USB(A) => Macbook => PHD2 => USB(A) => AZEQ6
      Guiding-camera => USB(A) => Macbook => PHD2 => Wifi => SynscaWifi Adapter on AZEQ6
      [using ST4: ST4_on_AZEQ6 => Guiding-camera => USB(A) => Macbook => PHD2] (no additional connections needed if ST4 is used)
      Additionally, I'd like to use an observatory package, say Stellarium/KStars/SkySafari, to select objects and drive the mount, then use guiding software to keep good 'tracking'.
      Where in this train does EQMac fit in, or when is it used?
      What about the 2019 addition to EQMod (ASCOM Alpaca)? Can this be used or is it already in other packages?!
      For Windows users, how does EQMod fit in (if I go down route of getting Windows laptop for controlling things, is the setup similar to above?
      There may be bits in the above that repeat, and for that, I'm sorry, just want to get across the message that I'm new to the guiding but haven't quite settled down into the software/hardware I'm expecting to use for 'goto' and 'guiding'
      TLDR:
      For a mac user, what setup and software are folks using for guiding and observatory softwares for the newer USB-on-mount 'AZEQ6/EQ6-R Pro' mounts from SW?
    • By astrosathya
      Recently I had belt modded my HEQ5-PRO and last night i gave it a full run and i was absolutely stunned to say the least about the guiding results I achieved. I was left wondering if its even too good to be true! 
      Below are Before and After images of guiding.


    • By Andrew Bennett
      Hi
      I have a Skywatcher Newtonian telescope ( D:200, f:1000) The other day I noticed that the 'O' ring which was attached to the finder scope had broken.  After a bit of digging around, I obtained what I believe is the correct size replacement ( 1.5 mm thickness, 52mm internal diameter).  However, I can't see how it attaches to the finder scope !  Can anyone offer some guidance ?  Many thanks in advance.
      Andrew
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.