Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_31.thumb.jpg.b7a41d6a0fa4e315f57ea3e240acf140.jpg

Recommended Posts

With a 3rd night of data added, here's another process of the Veil nebula.

34 x Ha, Astronomik 12nm filter, modified Canon 450D

28 x SII, Astronomik 12nm filter, modified Canon 450D

61 x OIII, Astronomik 12nm filter, standard Canon 600D

All 4m subs, with flats.

gallery_22006_1943_364137.jpg

Pseudo real colour created by adding all the above as RGB.

gallery_22006_1943_235453.jpg

Hubble palette: R=SII, G=Ha, B=OIII

I think this just isn't a subject that lends itself to the Hubble palette.

Also I'm not happy with my processing. I went heavy on star and noise reduction, but that's blurring the fine lines of the nebula too. I suspect this is one I'll revisit again. The noise levels of the Ha and SII are visible stronger than the OIII, so I think I'll spend yet another night on it some time to boost that some more.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I imagine this would look good made as a 3D picture with 3D glasses. Certainly the left part looks like it has three dimensions not two! And the sky looks darker in the second picture somehow. Maybe there's just a bigger contrast between black and magneta than between black and purple.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SnythLRGB-Ha-SII-OIII-s.jpg

Following a comment by Olly about doing a summed mono version, I thought I'd give it a quick go. Not having to worry about colour noise, I could be more aggressive at bringing out the faint stuff. I like what I saw, and thought, how would it look if I used that as the L channel for LRGB recombination? The result is sampled above, which can be clicked through to a bigger version (it was 1920 wide but the forum gallery seems to have shrunk it to 1600).

Also I felt like a change of palette, so it's in R=Ha, G=SII, B=OIII with little post adjustment. The noise wasn't as good as I hoped, probably due to the synthetic L channel having correlated noise since it was created from the individual colour channels. Perhaps with more selective channel noise reduction there's more potential left in this technique. Or maybe I could throw all the different channel data into an "anything goes" stack for L channel? That might be an overnight job if I ever dare do it...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting :) And I see what you mean by not getting all the bottom nebulosity in the frame as you mentioned in my thread. Is that with ED80 with 0.85x FR/FF?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is with a Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 OS lens wide open. If you want pinpoint stars, this wont be your optic of choice!

Thanks :) Silly me - of course its a lens not a scope - must be getting tired :D

May not be the best optic but your images are very sharp, none the less :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gina, showing the images scaled down does a good job of hiding the optical nasties :)

Keith, well, I was getting SII, although it was pretty low down. Following are samples of the stack I did of each. Both were stacked using the same settings, and the output below have the same stretch. I never noticed before the SII seems to have a higher background level. I don't have an explanation for that, but could skyglow be higher at SII wavelengths than Ha, even if they are close? The sensor sensitivity should be lower at SII anyway, so if anything the level might be lower, and I don't think anything would have boosted the background.

sample-Ha.jpg

Sample Ha

sample-SII.jpg

Sample SII

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for posting that, shooting at F2.8 is the crucial difference I think, I'm shooting at F5.3 so im probably fighting a losing battle against the noise floor with too little signal with SII. Good to know that SII is possible though with the modded 450d, maybe Gina should get that SII clip afterall :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think so TBH though I am planning to cool my widefield camera. That would make it a bit more feasible. But I'm trying NOT to spend on anything of poorer benefit - I'd rather put the funds towards an Atik 314L+. This doesn't mean I shall be abandoning my DSLR efforts - there is room for both. The Atik would be for smaller DSOs and particularly NB when an SII filter will definitely be considered, with the main camera on the scope covering larger objects in colour. I shall keep a widefield camera for Ha, OIII and use as a finder. ATM I have a spare modded DSLR (1100D) which I could possibly set up as a side-by-side setup - Ha and OIII until I sell the spare camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all. I am quite pleased I'm making fair use of a DSLR for imaging, although I still want to add more data to reduce the noise further on this one, which might allow me to dig a bit deeper too.

Also as I want to concentrate on narrowband, a CCD is a natural upgrade for when I decide to throw enough money at it. And a new set of filters, and new optics... and... :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I expect to add an astro CCD camera to my kit when I've saved up enough. Might manage it before the end of winter :D Maybe earlier depending if any unexpected expenses crop up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My problem is if I go CCD which is expensive enough on its own, I really need a new set of filters too. I'm rather attracted to a set of Astrodon's 3nm ones to help me through light pollution as best I can.

Why wouldn't you be able to use your Astrodon filters?

I have a filter wheel building project on the back burner and expect to buy some 1.25" Baader filters in due course - probably Ha and OIII first then maybe SII and an LRGB set.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confused... Do you mean Astrodon 3nm filters as in your earlier post or Astronomik clip filters which surely aren't that narrow? The narrowest from Modern Astronomy where I bought mine, are 6nm bandwidth - do Astronomik actually make 3nm ones?

I'm keeping my Astronomik filters for widefield use and will buy new filters for NB CCD use. You could make a filter carousel to take clip-in type filters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By f33n3y
      Hi everyone,
      Here is the Eastern Veil Nebula (NGC 6992/5), part of a large supernova remnant found in the constellation of Cygnus. You are looking at the wispy leftovers of a star 20 times more massive than our sun which exploded some 8000 years ago.
      Equipment:
      - Sky-Watcher 200PDS telescope
      - HEQ5 Pro mount
      - ZWO ASI1600MM camera for capture
      - ZWO filter wheel, Ha and Oiii filters
      - ZWO 120MM camera for autoguiding
      - ZWO finder-guider guidescope
      - Artesky flats box
      Acquisition:
      - 6th September 2019 from my garden in Glasgow, Scotland.
      - 50x120sec with Ha filter, unity gain
      - 50x120sec with Oiii filter, unity gain
      - 20 flats each filter and 20 darks
      - Controlled using Sequence Generator Pro
      Processing:
      - Stacked in Deep Sky Stacker
      - PixInsight dynamic crop, dynamic background extraction, pixelmath (to produce bicolour HOO image), colour calibration, SCNR, histogram transformation, curved transformation, star mask and star reduction, TGV denoise
      - Final denoise with Topaz Denoise and some touch ups in Lightroom.
      Future improvements:
      - More time on the target (less clouds).
      - Addition of comma corrector to my imaging train.
      - Create mosaic of the wider Veil nebula area.
      - Improve PixInsight processing workflow.
      More shots:
      https://www.instagram.com/glasgowastro

    • By steppenwolf
      Pickering’s Triangle (Seimis 3-188)
      It is a little early in the season to be imaging this object as it didn’t appear above my local horizon until 00:50 when I started the project earlier this month but with nights getting shorter as we approach the summer solstice, it made sense to make an early start even though it took several nights to capture the data while ducking and diving between the clouds and early morning mist!
      Discovery
      Pickering’s Triangle is part of the supernova remnant known as The Veil Nebula in Cygnus. The Veil Nebula itself was discovered by William Herschel in September, 1784 but this faint region was only later discovered photographically in 1904 by Williamina Fleming at the Harvard Observatory. The discovery was made post publication of the New General Catalogue (NGC) so it isn’t included in the catalogue. Although it wouldn’t happen today (I hope!), the custom of the time was to credit the discovery to the lead astronomer, in this case Edward Charles Pickering, the director of the observatory.

      Image Stats

      Mount: Mesu 200
      Telescope: Sky-Watcher Esprit 150
      Flattener: Sky-Watcher Esprit specific
      Camera: QSI 683 WSG-8
      Filter: Astrodon 3nm Ha and 3nm OIII
      Subframes: 6 x 1800 sec Ha, 13 x 1800 sec OIII
      Integration: 9.5 hours
      Control: CCD Commander
      Capture: MaxIm DL
      Calibration, Stacking and Deconvolution: PixInsight
      Post-Processing: PhotoShop PS3
      Description
      The nebula can be found in the north-west quadrant of the Veil Nebula near NGC 6974 and 79 (see whole Veil Nebula image below). Lying around 1,400 light years away, the beautiful filamentary elements are the expanding shock-wave from the progenitor star that went supernova here somewhere between 5,000 and 10,000 years ago.

      Position within the Veil Nebula

      Visually, the nebula responds well to the use of an OIII filter as the region is rich in OIII emissions as can be seen in the blue/green filaments in the above images.
      Photographically this is a wonderful object that responds well to both LRGB and narrowband imaging and the example shown here was captured using Ha and OIII filters. Although there are sulphur emissions (SII) in this region, this object responds well to my favourite imaging method of 'bi-colour’. This process uses just Ha and OIII filtration wherein the OIII data is mapped to both the ‘Green’ and ‘Blue’ channels and the Ha is mapped to the ‘Red’ channel. The greyscale  images below show the individual Ha (left) and OIII (right) images used to produce this image. As you can see from the 'Stats' above, I have a whole load more Ha to collect to complete the image!
      The individual Ha and OIII images

       
    • By Hayduke27
      I made it out to my dark site on Friday evening, a few high wispy clouds in the sky but for the most part it was quite nice out.  The moon was already low and near setting, and I had just received my new Astronomik OIII filter, so I decided to try and find a few objects that have given me fits from the get-go.  I started the night taking a long hard look at the double cluster, something I only recently discovered, and then swung the scope around to Albireo, another newer sight for me. 
       
      After getting my eyes full of stars, I affixed the filter to my ES 30MM 82° eyepiece.  I swung the scope over to the Eastern Veil and WHOA!!!!!!  There it was, in all its glory.  A little too big to fit the whole thing in the EP at once, I kept swinging the scope back and forth over the length of the nebula, totally blown away with how clear it suddenly was.  I had been wanting to see this object from day 1, and have read about people's reactions when they first saw it.  I was no different.  I don't even know how long I spent swinging the scope back and forth, just taking it all in as if it would disappear at any second.  As my first light adrenaline calmed down, I swung the scope down and found the Western Veil as well, another stunning site with 52 Cyg bisecting it and lighting it up so brightly!  Just amazing! 
       
      I never tired of looking at the veil, but eventually wanted to try to bag a couple more objects.  I panned all of the way around to the Rosette Nebula.  I found the telltale cluster that lies in the middle of the nebula, and was soon admiring the light ring of smoke surrounding the cluster.  With a little time and effort, I was able to tease out enough detail to really see what the Rosette was all about, and once again, I was not disappointed.  Next came the Helix Nebula, another object I've tried and failed to find in the past.  This night I was successful, though after seeing the prior 2 targets the Helix was more of just a passing find for the checklist.
       
      I scoped out M42 with the OIII filter and was able to make out some details I hadn't previously seen.  Since I was already there, I switched to a smaller EP and got some magnification going so I could observe the trapezium, once again managing to see the "e" star but no "f".
       
      I still missed some of the major objects on my list.  I have yet to see the Heart or Soul Nebulas and couldn't find them on this night.  I have yet to get any substantial views of the North America Nebula.  I missed the Witch Head and Cocoon as well.  
       
      I took the filters off and surfed around the Universe bagging a few beautiful galaxies, including Stephan's Quintet and the Deerlick Cluster.  I scoped out NGC 777 in Triangulum, always a cool object to tease out of the dark skies.  I saw NGC 253, the Sculptor Galaxy, for my first time.  This is a cool target to which I need to return.   A few globulars and open clusters later, and I was getting chilly and ready to call it a night.
       
      All in all I had a great session and managed first light on a few major targets I'd been hoping to see for a long time.  As always, there was plenty that I didn't get around to looking for, and more that I missed with an attempt, serving only to heighten my desire to find them on a future night.  I'm glad all you folks across the pond are getting some nice views, and it sounds like everyone but me was out looking at the Horsey.  Maybe I'll add that my my advanced list of future challenges.  Thanks for reading!
    • By evansg
      The Veil Nebula is a diffuse nebula located in the northern constellation Cygnus, the Swan.
      Also known as Witch’s Broom Nebula, Bridal Veil Nebula, Cirrus Nebula, or Filamentary Nebula, it constitutes the visible parts of the Cygnus Loop, a supernova remnant in Cygnus. It is located at an approximate distance of 1,470 light years from Earth.
      In this wide shot you can see the three main parts: the Eastern Veil, the Western Veil, and Fleming’s Triangle (Pickering’s Triangle).
      Full resolution: http://www.celestialpixels.com/Nebulae/i-zcwHVLh/A

      Telescope: Telescope: TAK FSQ85
      Camera: QSI 683
      Filters: RGB + Ha + O3
      Total Exposure: 12h
      Location: Mt Parnon @ 1430m. Greece
       
    • By Davide Simonetti
      It's always fun to image a new target and it was worth using a rare trip to a place with much darker skies (Kelvedon Common in Essex) to try something a bit more challenging. This could have done with more exposure but nights are short at this time of year and dawn put a stop to the session. 
      29 x 120 second exposures at 400 ISO (58 minutes integration time).
      12 x dark frames
      79 x flat frames
      21 x bias/offset frames (subtracted from flat frames only)
      Captured with APT
      Guided with PHD2
      Processed in Nebulosity and Photoshop 
      Equipment:
      Sky-Watcher Explorer-150PDS
      Skywatcher EQ5 Mount
      Orion 50mm Mini Guide Scope
      ZWO ASI120 MC imaging and guiding camera
      Canon 700D DSLR

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.