Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

Located near the top of the Teapot in Sagittarius, Messier 22 is a huge globular that is big enough to be prominent in wide-field images. Compare its size to the tiny M-28 to the lower right of the frame. Messier 22 is plainly visible to the unaided eye, even when low on the horizon on a clear dark night.

This view was captured by an antique(1975) 300mm f/4 Asahi Pentax SMC Takumar lens attached to a Pentax Spotmatic II (1973 era) exposing for only 15 minutes @ f/4 using Kodak ED200 slide film. To be sure, star images are not perfect as there was no ED glass when this lens was made, but nice nonetheless.

Thanks for looking.

Jim

ED200002HC2cc2.jpg

Edited by Nightfly
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another real retro beauty, Jim. Perfect, perfect. Look at that colour!

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outstanding shot amazing colour it certainly does it for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely rich field - unfortunately at 51 deg this region never really rises enough to take in it's full splendour...

andrew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all. Objects are so bright in this region, relatively short exposures capture lots of detail. It is a little low for me at my +44.5 North latitude. The whole region is deep sky playground. Go are far south as you can Andrew. Lots of great stuff in Scutum and northern Sagittarius!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heh heh nice one, and in colour too! Great job.

Tom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonderful :) Another great shot :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is really nice Jim. The Spotmatic was the first SLR I used.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom and Gina. As always, I'm appreciative of the feedback. SGL is my favorite forum because of its friendly enthusiastic members.

Sp@ce_d, I don't need to tell you what a great camera the old Spotty is. It has been my go-to camera since 1984. I keep a roll in it most of the time.

I hope this post gets people out to look at, or image Messier 22. The grandest globular visible from mid-northern latitudes IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom and Gina. As always, I'm appreciative of the feedback. SGL is my favorite forum because of its friendly enthusiastic members.

Sp@ce_d, I don't need to tell you what a great camera the old Spotty is. It has been my go-to camera since 1984. I keep a roll in it most of the time.

I hope this post gets people out to look at, or image Messier 22. The grandest globular visible from mid-northern latitudes IMHO.

I think I still have my old Spotty, as you call it, in a drawer somewhere - may have a play sometime :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not bad for a guy that taught me everything he knows - and I still know nothing. Nice work Jim - Love the Spotty. Hope it encourages others to bring out their old friend once in awhile.

igor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great work Jim!

The object is rarely imaged.

Is there such thing with film as flats?

Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not bad for a guy that taught me everything he knows - and I still know nothing. Nice work Jim - Love the Spotty. Hope it encourages others to bring out their old friend once in awhile.

igor

If you know nothing, then I did not teach you anything :grin:

I still enjoy 35mm, but Medium Format is king. I'm low on Elite Chrome 200 in 35mm. I will have to run the last roll through the Spotty soon. A final dedication to the craft perhaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great work Jim!

The object is rarely imaged.

Is there such thing with film as flats?

Mark

One can process a frame as a flat and use it as a mask to eliminate vignetting. It has been a routine task for years in post processing. No flat was applied to this image as there is too much in the frame to pull it off. One could shoot a sparse area of the sky and easily get a flat generated using PixInsight DBE. The generated mask or flat could be applied to any image taken with the same film / setup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you know nothing, then I did not teach you anything :grin:

I still enjoy 35mm, but Medium Format is king. I'm low on Elite Chrome 200 in 35mm. I will have to run the last roll through the Spotty soon. A final dedication to the craft perhaps.

Jim you taught me a lot - I just cannot remember anything after a pint or two of the black stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outstanding image.. now I must really have a go at film.. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By JonnyT
      Hello everyone,
      I'm Jonny and I live in Farnborough in Hampshire, UK.
      My friend and I are taking our first baby-steps into night sky photography so I'm here for all the help I can get.
      We're just starting out so our equipment is very basic, but I'm sure the more we get into this the more we will upgrade over time.
       
      Currently our set up consists of:
      Home-made Motorised Barn Door Tracker (my friend is an engineer)
      Canon 1100D with an 18-55mm Lens
      Laptop with BackyardEOS
       
      We took everything out for it's first test-drive last week and the tracker works really well. Even on very long exposures the stars remain as points and not trails so we were really pleased with how it performed.
      I've attached what was probably our most successful picture of the evening. It' not amazing, but it's a start.
      I would really love to get some photos of the Milky Way and I'm hoping you all could suggest some settings to use, imaging techniques to try out and equipment upgrades? We're on a bit of a budget but we have photographer friends from whom we can beg and borrow equipment.
      Looking forward to chatting with you all in time.
       
      Jonny

    • By Frankiej90
      Hi all,
      Newbie to the forum but I just wanted to share some shots with you that I managed to get over the weekend. Got the Milky Way and even a few of NEOWISE which was amazing to witness 😊
      Milky Way - 5 x 20 seconds stacked (not tracked), 11mm, F/2.8, ISO 800
      NEOWISE Landscape shot - Single exposure, 8 seconds, 16mm, F/2.8, ISO 800
      NEOWISE Stack 1 - 2 x 10 seconds, 16mm, F/2.8, ISO 800
      NEOWISE Stack 2 - 2 x 13 seconds, 55mm, F/5.6, ISO 1600 
      For a first real attempt, I'm pretty pleased with them but obviously, I have a lot more to learn! 
      Frankie




    • By KevinPSJ
      Wide angle shot of Milky Way in Cygnus. 10 min total (4 subs of 2.5 min each) at ISO 100. Nikon D3200 with kit lens at 18mm (f/5.6). Tracking on a skywatcher 150p EQ3-2 mount - no guiding.
    • By Kronos831
      I currently am on holiday in my father's hometown, a small island near rhodes called symi.Symj, is a pretty small town,with only about 2000 residents.That means that the light pollution levels must be low. Acknowledging that, i called my friends, grabbed my 10x50 bins(that i got for 20€ from Turkey),and went on my way to find a dark site.About after 20 mins of walking (from the city),i stumbled upon a beach, it was dark, so i went in.There i decided to lay on a sunbed that was there.After looking up(not being dark adapted, my friends just kept turning their flashlights on for some reason), i saw the haze of the milky way stretching from Cassiopeia to cygnus and beyond!I was amazed as i ve never seen the milky way before and smudged it off as clouds until i confirmed it was the milky way from an app! The weird part was that at just straight overhead, was the port ,which had many lights, and as a result the sky appeared half bright and half dark. I turned over at Sagittarius and headed over the lagoon nebula. Brilliant! 3-4 stars in a line surrounded by bright nebulosity.(while still being in the haze!) Afterwards i headed to cygnus,it was a real light show! I saw the milky way layering on top of Cygnus while catching a glimpse of m23 and yet again, failing to see NGC7000 . Then, with the corner of my eye, i detected something moving, then turned over to Cassiopeia to see a shooting stsr!(it was my first time seeing one!!!) Was very brief, yet enjoyable. Right afterwards i turned over at the Perseus double cluster.Magnificent! Appeared as 2 small balls of light , almost connected yo eachother. Finally, i realised that finally, the target i was seeking to observe all year long, M31 was into the area with the light pollution! What a shame! While also being low on the Horizon, I couldnt see it with the naked eye. I observed it with ny binoculars for 10 minutes or so . The core was resolved nicely with some hints of outer nebulosity. Overall a great night and now, i wished i had my 8" dob with me....
      (Sorry for any granmar mistakes, im currently typing this at 2 am xD)
    • By Matty_C
      Hello all,
      I have just joined and have been looking around, and putting in various searches to find the answer to my question(s).
      I have already found some valuable information, but i can't find a specific answer to a question i have relating to exposure times.
      I have shot the milky way several times before, from a tripod and a wide angle lens. I am aware of and understand the "500 rule" and that worked fine for me at first when i was shooting with my Canon 6D Mark II. When i moved over to the Sony A7III i noticed significant trailing using the same rule and that led me to the NPF rule (Via the photopills app incase people dot know).
      I am heading back to Tenerife once again in about 6 weeks time and want to buy a star tracker so i can get some really detailed images.
      I have done a fair bit of research and in principle, the whole thing doesn't seem to be too daunting or difficult.
      I have purchased the Polar Scope Align Pro app so i can align Polaris as accurately as possible, i will practise putting the unit together and familiarising myself with the different parts etc, but it is the exposure times that i do not understand.
      My best glass is the Carl Ziess 50mm F/1.4 Planar, the 18mm F/2.8 Batis, the Sigma 35mm F/1.4 Art & the IRIX 15mm F/2.4 Blackstone.
      I currently do not own, nor have i ever used a tracker, and I cannot find any information relating to which aperture, ISO and Shutter length any of these focal lengths should or could be shot at.
      Is there anything similar to the 500 rule or NPF rule that relates to using a tracker with varied focal lengths? or is it just a case of stepping the lens down for sharpness and then trial and error?
      Thanks in advance,
       
      Matt.
       
       
       
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.