Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

I took the best ISS images captured during yesterdays transit and ran them through Registax 6 to produce this image

iss_wav.jpg

I think there are few artifacts present from the processing but I'm pleased with it :)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey how cool is that?!! :Envy: Can you get the astonauts to wave next time?!!! :grin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey how cool is that?!! :Envy: Can you get the astonauts to wave next time?!!! :grin:

I was reading through Kev's other thread with this capture when it struck me that when the ISS goes overhead, it's actually closer to me than I am to Manchester. Which kind of puts things in perspective :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, it's also got me thinking...

If you've not seen Kev's original image, have a look, it's excellent. ISS against the backdrop of the Sun and sunspots in beautiful detail.

However, if the aim were to track the ISS itself, would it be possible with an EQ6, or would it be likely to tie itself in knots and throw a fit? I assume you'd have to give up at the point it wanted to do a meridian flip or it might launch itself into orbit.

James

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was reading through Kev's other thread with this capture when it struck me that when the ISS goes overhead, it's actually closer to me than I am to Manchester. Which kind of puts things in perspective :)

You certainly wouldn't want to see it at ground level belting up the M6 at 7-8 kilometres per second. It would probably have a white Transit van right on its butt :)

I think the EQ6 is capable of tracking the ISS in real time, there is software around that does some of the work for you.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem is the ISS doesn't follow an arc that can be tracked in RA.

There is tracking software out there , Thierry Legault has some magical program but I don't think it's available to all and sundry.

This guy's using a satellite tracking program too , haven't managed to find it yet though , makes things a little easier than aiming manually.... :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think i'll stick too manual point and shoot , way too complicated for me...... :p

Thanks for the link though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think i'll stick too manual point and shoot , way too complicated for me...... :p

Thanks for the link though.

I've just downloaded the two software packages and running the Ascom simulator all over the sky :) Follow the video and it's pretty straight forward BUT, and it is a big BUT, if you connect it to real hardware then be very sure you won't have a collision or cable issue during the tracking because it will be quick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what i thought ,

When I have a go at it I get everything set up on HEQ5Pro to let me get the bits and pieces in line and camera settings sorted ,

Then I check with the charts in Heavens above and have a few practice sweeps ,

I generally then have to switch off the mount and re-position the tripod so as to allow a clean sweep avoiding collisions .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice Kev.

I have used that tracking software once.. it tracked the ISS perfectly... my only problem, I messed up the setup somewhere along the line and I was a couple of degrees behind the ISS for the entire pass and no amount of messing would allow me to catch up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That photo is awsome :Envy: :Envy: :Envy:

Ive never really tried to photograph satellites like the ISS but i will definetly give it a go now :grin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You certainly wouldn't want to see it at ground level belting up the M6 at 7-8 kilometres per second. It would probably have a white Transit van right on its butt

Would be a good way to clear the traffic out of your way :grin::eek:

I think the EQ6 is capable of tracking the ISS in real time, there is software around that does some of the work for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Incredible image - is that with the 4" refractor?

With my 4" f11 PST stage 2 modded refractor and DMK21 camera

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem is the ISS doesn't follow an arc that can be tracked in RA.

There is tracking software out there , Thierry Legault has some magical program but I don't think it's available to all and sundry.

This guy's using a satellite tracking program too , haven't managed to find it yet though , makes things a little easier than aiming manually.... :p

Satellit tracker is one program. Not sure if it's still available ,but I think it is...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By jambouk
      I asked a few weeks ago about charging two batteries from one solar panel. I’ve now got a solar controller which can do this, see below, but I’m confused by the instruction manual, especially how I should set the “charging priority”. I assumed the unit would charge battery 1 until full, then move on and charge battery 2 until full, then go back to 1. I’m not sure what this charging priority is - image of the relevant page from the manual below. I’d be grateful to hear what you think it means.
      Thanks.
      James.


    • By MalVeauX
      Hey all,
      I made an acquisition and processing tutorial a while back (3 years ago? Yikes!) and it is fairly dated in terms of what I'm doing these days. I've been asked for a long time to make a new one showing what I'm doing these days. Specifically how I'm processing a single shot image for both the surface and prominences and how to process them together to show prominences and the surface at once. I've abandoned doing split images and composites and strictly work from one image using layers. Acquisition does not use gamma at all anymore. Nothing terribly fancy, but it's not exactly intuitive so hopefully this new video will illustrate most of the fundamentals to get you started. Instead of an hour, this time it's only 18 minutes. It's real time from start to finish. I'm sorry for the long "waiting periods" where I'm just waiting for the software to finish its routine, it lasts 1.5 minutes and 30 seconds tops typically at first. The first 4 minutes is literally just stacking & alignment in AS!3. I typically will go faster than this, but wanted to slow down enough to try to talk through what I'm doing as I do it. Hopefully you can see each action on the screen. I may have made a few mistakes or said a few incorrect things or terms, forgive me for that, this is not my day job. I really hope it helps folk get more into processing as its not difficult or intimidating when you see a simple process with only a few things that are used. The key is good data to begin with and a good exposure value. Today's data came from a 100mm F10 achromatic refractor and an ASI290MM camera with an HA filter. I used FireCapture to acquire the data with a defocused flat frame. No gamma is used. I target anywhere from 65% to 72% histogram fill. That's it! The processing is fast and simple. I have a few presets that I use, but they are all defaults in Photoshop. A lot of the numbers I use for parameters are based on image scale, so keep that in mind, experiment with your own values. The only preset I use that is not a default is my coloring scheme. I color with levels in Photoshop, and my values are Red: 1.6, Green 0.8, Blue 0.2 (these are mid-point values).
      Processing Tutorial Video (18 minutes):
      https://youtu.be/RJvJEoVS0oU
      RAW (.TIF) files available here to practice on (the same images you will see below as RAW TIFs):
      https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zjeoux7YPZpGjlRGtX6fH7CH2PhB-dzv
      Video for Acquisition, Focus, Flat Calibration and Exposure (20 minutes):
      (Please let me know if any links do not work)
      ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
      ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
      Results from today using this work flow method.
      Colored:




      B&W:




      SSM data (sampled during 1.5~2 arc-second seeing conditions):

      Equipment for today:
      100mm F10 Frac (Omni XLT 120mm F8.3 masked to 4")
      Baader Red CCD-IR Block Filter (ERF)
      PST etalon + BF10mm
      ASI290MM
      SSM (for fun, no automation)


      Very best,
       
    • By BabyPepper
      160mm x 1600mm + Lunt LS50C etalon.
      Thanks for looking!
            <br>    

       
    • By alanjgreen
      Just bagged 10 minutes between the clouds and got to see the Mercury shadow transit!
      Its so long since I used the Lunt that I took a few seconds to get back into the groove of tuning the double stack and letting some air into the tuner as it was flat.
      Not much else on the disc - 3 x sets of proms, 3 tiny filaments, saw one small bright flux patch briefly.
      But the Mercury shadow was nice and clear and a decent sized patch too.
      Just got back inside before it started spotting with rain! Fingers crossed for another clear patch later ...
      Alan
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.