Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

GlassWalker

Focusing DMK41 on PST

Recommended Posts

Before anyone says it, I have got and fitted the short shoulder-less nose piece and removed the 5mm extension ring it comes with.

With that out of the way, the DMK41 arrived today. I ordered the short nosepiece with it, and putting them on the PST the camera body is flush with the end of the eyepiece holder on the PST. It isn't getting any closer. In a quick and frustrating play, I just can't find focus. The sun spent most of the time hiding behind clouds so I didn't get much time, but I went near enough end to end on the focus scale. Before I gave up the sun was behind a TV aerial and trees, and using that as reference I know I can focus closer by rotating the knob clockwise. Infinity should obviously be the other direction, so I wound it as far as I dare anti-clockwise. It hits some resistance and by this point the knob sticks out quite far. So I'm hesitant to go further. Is this normal? Should I keep turning or will something fall apart before I hit an end stop?

Any other tips? I did manually adjust the exposure so the sun wasn't blown out, but I haven't really had time to play with the settings yet.

Given the sun has gone down now, I'll obviously can't try again until tomorrow (weather allowing).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was another thread about focusing issues with a PST and DMK on here a few days ago. I don't own a PST (or DMK), but I have to say I'm confused. I thought you should be able to focus with the short nosepiece.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm beginning to think the current batch of PST scopes hitting the stores have a slightly altered focussing setup inside the black box which is preset at the factory. Does anyone have a Coronado contact who they could ask??

When I got my PST last year the DMK41 and short nosepiece just worked without any issues and it also worked for a lot of other PST users i.e. no one was reporting focusing problems

I have a PST black box left over from my PST Stage 2 modification which I know worked very well as a standard PST and focussed without problems, I could take apart if it would help anyone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm beginning to think the current batch of PST scopes hitting the stores have a slightly altered focussing setup inside the black box set at the factory. When I got my PST last year the DMK41 and short nosepiece just worked without any issues and it also worked for a lot of other PST users

That's what I thought. Something must have changed ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did have a search before posting, but didn't see anything relevant. I did get the PST quite recently, a month or so ago. If it is scope focus range tolerance I wonder what can I do to work around it? If I'm not mistaken, adding some glass (e.g. some filter) should extend the focus point a little, maybe that'll be enough. I don't want to go to a barlow yet as I want to try a full sun single shot. Or is it crazy to think of using a barlow and focal reducer? :D Before that, I'll see if I can turn the knob some more until either my nerve or the PST breaks. Last resort would be modifying the PST...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did have a search before posting, but didn't see anything relevant. I did get the PST quite recently, a month or so ago. If it is scope focus range tolerance I wonder what can I do to work around it? If I'm not mistaken, adding some glass (e.g. some filter) should extend the focus point a little, maybe that'll be enough. I don't want to go to a barlow yet as I want to try a full sun single shot. Or is it crazy to think of using a barlow and focal reducer? :D Before that, I'll see if I can turn the knob some more until either my nerve or the PST breaks. Last resort would be modifying the PST...

Taking the side plate off the black box isn't a big deal (other than voiding the warrenty) there is next to nothing in there other than the pentaprism and focussing screw. It would be simple to then see what was moving when you focus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Longer term I was considering to adapt the PST to a bigger scope, but I thought I'd at least leave it until after I mastered the PST.

Even if I can't get that to work, I've still got a CaK filter to play with also :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just need a 2" nosepiece for the front of the etalon, a donor scope and D-ERF. What that won't overcome is the focus problem for a ccd camera

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk. Blame Apple for the typos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*if* the etalon can be placed relatively far into the donor scope, wouldn't the focus point then be further out from eyepiece holder? Assuming other things don't get in the way of the light path of course, since I don't know exactly what's inside...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Merlin66 is the expert with these things but based on my playing there is a 200mm lens built into the rear of the PST etalon and it is this lens that defines the nominal focus point behind the etalon. When you go to the Stage 2 mod you replace the black box with other blocking filters and adaptors to make up this 200mm length http://www.photosbykev.com/wordpress/2011/11/29/pst-modifications/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen your page before, but there's one major detail I didn't tweak until now. The etalon is the round bit in front of the black box? Doh! I assumed for some reason it was in the black box...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we make a measurement to compare the lengths or is it all internal?

It has never really seemed like Meade are keen for the PST to be an imagers scope so maybe they have changed the lengths as they find out the tricks we come up with.

I don't know but there is enough of us here that with older versions to maybe compare.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all internal Jarrod, unless they have changed the spec of the 200mm lens on the rear of the etalon?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen your page before, but there's one major detail I didn't tweak until now. The etalon is the round bit in front of the black box? Doh! I assumed for some reason it was in the black box...

The etalon (with the rubber band in front of the black box) has to be tuned in order to see any detail on the surface or prominences. It doesn't change the focus but it does alter the bandwidth to allow the relevant portion of H-a light to be transmitted through the scope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get that the ring sets the etalon. I just didn't realise was where the etalon was physically located. I had assumed the ring was mechanically coupled to an etalon placed inside the black box. Maybe I should take it apart for fun, although my track record of putting things back together again isn't the best :D

On Jarrod's idea that Meade could deliberately cripple the PST for imaging, what would they gain? The PST is priced as an ideal starter solar scope. If I had to pay much more, I wouldn't have bothered at all. They wouldn't have upsold me to their higher models. Or if I was spending that much more, maybe I would end up with a Lunt anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all internal Jarrod, unless they have changed the spec of the 200mm lens on the rear of the etalon?

On Jarrod's idea that Meade could deliberately cripple the PST for imaging, what would they gain? The PST is priced as an ideal starter solar scope. If I had to pay much more, I wouldn't have bothered at all. They wouldn't have upsold me to their higher models. Or if I was spending that much more, maybe I would end up with a Lunt anyway.

It was just that earlier comment that got me thinking, I wouldn't put it past a manufacturer anyway, but I don't know and it may be a rash call.

I have a dmk41 on the way and as there has been a couple of these threads lately so it's caught my eye, my PST is newish but probably over a year old so I'll give it a go and hope for the best.

What I'd think they'd gain is people would get a taste for Ha viewing, it is brilliant after all but if it's a right faff getting the pst to do what you want it to do then maybe you'd spend double the price for a model up.

However like you said there is no way the scope would be as successful as it is if you had to pay much more for it, it could just be a poorly formed marketing strategy. I don't know, speculation and heresay will get us nowhere.

I do hope that a solution can be found though because it's such an enjoyable scope to use.

Hopefully it's just the etalon.

Edited by Pibbles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To the best of my knowledge there have been no changes to the optical system in the PST since it was first introduced in 2003.

It was conceived and designed primarily as a visual instrument. Imagers could use the Coronado Solarmax or the SM series external etalon filters.

The Lunt's which came along later were designed to accommodate imaging.

(Glasswalker - I have a detailed write-up on the PST Mod - just PM me an email address for a copy - all is reveiled!)

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before anyone says it, I have got and fitted the short shoulder-less nose piece and removed the 5mm extension ring it comes with.

... It hits some resistance and by this point the knob sticks out quite far. So I'm hesitant to go further. Is this normal? Should I keep turning or will something fall apart before I hit an end stop?...

yeah, no reason to unscrew it any further. The pentaprism has already reached its maximum travel and is pushed up against the top of the black box. If you really want to know the travel range of the pentaprism via the focusing knob's position, unscrew the side plate of the black box, so you can see the travel of the penatprism by screwing in or out the focusing knob.

Edited by thenews24

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I am at the end of the focus range then? Not good... I'll have to see if I got my theory the right way around, that adding some glass will extend the focal point a little bit which I hope will be enough to achieve focus. Otherwise I guess I'm looking at a barlow, which will be annoying as I originally wanted to do fill disc imaging and not move onto mosaics just yet...

Speaking of annoying, the sun is out, but there is a lot of thin high cloud around at the moment. Will let my coffee kick in before I consider having a go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Set what correctly? Positionally it is as close as it is ever going to get without getting a saw out. Software settings, I manually vary the exposure so it isn't blown out, and I can't get the image in focus. I'm kinda getting there with the focus knob turned as far CCW as it goes, but not close enough. I can indirectly focus on things that are closer - if there's a foreground obstruction, I can focus on its silhouette. This is a classic symptom of the sensor being too far out.

Anyway, I did have a further play earlier today. Still no luck. I turned the focus knob more than I dared yesterday and have definitely hit a hard stop now. The image shifts when I hit that, so something is shifting in ways unintended and I wont do that again. I tried adding a filter as discussed, which I believe would extend the focal point slightly. The only suitable filter I have is a LP one, which I confirmed visually passes Ha. Didn't help either. My barlow I never got focus with anything on the PST, even with eyepieces. Looking inside it, the first element in the barlow is quite far up, so I guess that's my problem and I can't even use that.

I'm running out of options here... the only thing I have left to try is use eyepiece projection with the DMK... this could get... interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link, and also the earlier e-mail :) gonna have some fun reading that in detail while I wait for the sun to stop semi-hiding. It's still teasing me, popping out long enough for me to start something and disappear before I get anywhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just opened up my PST black box. The prism was a bit tilted, presumably from my earlier efforts at moving focus more than it would do. Have twisted that back a bit, although it wants to spring back to the tilted position.

Elsewhere, I have opened up my barlow and have extracted the optical assembly. This has a thread on one end which matches that of 1.25" eyepieces so I can fit it on the short nosepiece. But the direction of fit is opposite compared to normal. Past experience shows they can be directional, so just in case I flipped the optics around inside the holder too. I might need to play with the spacing later...

Now I just need some sun to test it. There was a heavy shower that just past and the weather forecast suggests I might not have a chance for a long time... :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds strange, I have no problem focusing my DMK41 on my PST. What I have found though, if you put the standard nosepiece on the DMK41 (the long one with the shoulder) add a 2x Barlow, focus on the sun and get the gain and gamma correct. Then remove the long nose piece and put the short one on and remove the barlow, focus is very nearly in the same place, but you have to just reduce the exposure right down. It should at least get you to a similar focus using this method.

Alexandra

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By astrorg
      Hello
      I have been away from this forum from possibly July - I never find a lot of time to do anything these days, same to be able to relax reading and interacting Astronomy forums.
      I asked here a few ideas about making a solar scope or modifying whatever I had and I was recommended to also see Solar Chat Forums and I did.
      Thanks to solarchatforums I have been able to do something decent and here is what I have done so far - very slowly!
      1. I purchased a second hand PST and replaced its ITF with Maier one from the US and it finally had a clear image coming through + moved Etalon screw to third position - all the usual thing everybody does [after I researched it]!
      2. used a new SCT screw-on short focuser [used once or twice on a LX200 R Classic] and using Teflon tape I screwed the PST Etalon to the focuser and purchased a 2" adaptor to fit on Etalon.
      3. then used a Chinese 2" to 1.25 and modified the 2" side socket taking internal ring off and making 3x 120° threaded holes and 3x nylon thumb screws and used that as an adaptor to fit the original PST eyepiece holder - strangely enough at present this adaptor is also used as a tilter ... until I buy a proper camera tilter
      4. then fit the above eyepiece holder into the SCT focuser with 2" to 1.252 adaptor in it and screwed the whole Gold PST tube with Etalon in it and made a BETTER PST - see image

      5. I also initially tried a 2.2x DSLR camera Lens magnifier in front of PST and it decently works too - so PST will be fine for full solar disk mainly and without the 0.5 angstrom - not forcibly needed, I am probably around 0.7 as it is!
      6. more importantly, I decided to make my own 90mm solar scope using the above bits and pieces.
      7. with the help of Solar Chat Forums [great guys with a lot of knowledge, some are professional - i.e. they know the optics mathematical details - which helps] I purchased a cheap Bresser AR90/900
      8. the ONLY usable thing there ... is the main tube, a nice and thick tube - the rest is ALL plastic!!!
      I dismounted all parts and saw tube shorter ... a bit too much ! - I could have saved ~6cm really as I went with original ideas, but forgot I was using a different telescope from my initial thoughts - silly me!
      So, I added a 6cm extension - no problems there to reach the 20cm inward needed for the PST Etalon which has ~20cm FL
      9. initially I used a Tuna Fish 100g tin to adapt the SCT focuser onto my AR152 and fit Etalon inside the focuser to get near the 20cm needed- lets call it Quark unit - which it is really!
      It worked well, so I decided to add a second focuser to tune the Etalon ... getting back to AR90/900 ...
      10. I was trying to avoid overspending, I could not afford to spend too much - then I remembered I had a unused AR102SX which in my mind I guessed ... the focuser should over AR90/900 and it did!
      It just fits perfectly - then drilled three holes for the holding screws et-voila'
      11. I purchased a second hand 75mn Baader D-ERF and fit it INSIDE the AR90 tube at about 20cm inside from the front air-spaced doublet lenses, as there are the usual internal rings soldered in and just sit on it and I have about 70mm aperture  - i.e 70mm width from the D-ERF for photons to get through.
      At that ~20cm distance from front lenses the beam is still very large - probably about 60-65mm - there is no heat in between - no need for air-escaping holes
      12. when I have the time I will make a solar finder scope and fit it on the tube - not that is really needed - I usually use CDC to get there almost over The Sun [having an almost exact spot on the yard!] - then use my eye without eyepiece and look thourgh the PST eyepiece holder for solar shinging and centre the telescope over The Sun.
      Well, it works well after tuning Etalon focuser correctly and then focusing/tuning Etalon etc. - the usual.
      See some images - still learning imaging/processing and a lot more to learn about Solar ... a lot!
      I will probably need to get a Power-mate 2.5x when I can afford it!
       
       

      1st mod - without the original black box - it works so much better - better focusing and sharper viewing too.


      This is the AR90/900 shorten tube with AR102SX focuser and adaptors to test it normally
       

       
      This is complete with the Quark Unit on the right side
      Since this image there have been some changing - do not use the revelation adaptor any more and added a 6cm 2" extension.
       
      Here are some images:

       
       
       

       
       
    • By Waynescave
      Hi guys
      Can anyone identify which control box this is? Is it focusmaster? And does it run off robofocus driver in Indi lib as I cannot get a successful connection (in indi within ekos) 
      I bought a robofocus motor with this control box second hand. 
      I have faith with seller that hardware works as should. 
      I've tried other cables and USB ports too. The software (k stars) I use does do port search when connecting equipment.. 
       
      Any help appreciated 
      Wayne

    • By Richard Shaw
      I acquired a second hand Coronado PST. The focus knob doesn't seem to have any effect on the image and, although it turns, it feels as if something inside the scope is "slipping".
      Is it worth opening up and taking a look to see the focus knob in action?
      Is there anywhere that services the PST without sending it outside the UK?
      Are there any nasty surprises if I open it up (springs, pressure points etc)?
    • By Andrew Larmour
      Hi all, 
       
      Absolute newby here - my first foray into astronomy. I bought a Saxon 1400mm 6" refractor secondhand complete with a EQ mount for a bargain price and I'm keen to get it working properly for both planetary and deep space observations.

      I invested in a few extras such as a laser collimator and a 3x barlow. I think I have a handle on how it all works including the EQ mount.  I took the scope out for a test over Easter - which just happened to coincide with a ISS transit of the full moon. Rippa, I thought, that would be great to capture on my first night of observations. The problem I have is the complete inability to focus the scope to anything like sharp enough.
      I have some photos I took with the scope attached: 
      The scene with the normal camera lens for my daylight practice session
      A shot of a distant house with the telescope (using a Nikon D7000 on a t-mount adaptor)
      The same house with the barlow attached
      A shot of the moon- no barlow - as sharp as I could get it - certainly no way to see the silhouette of the ISS with the scope this out of focus
      When I was collumating the scope, I noticed a that the reflection on the primary mirror was not a single spot but rather a line

      ... which means that the laser on the collimator target is a line rather than a dot

      I confirmed that this is not a problem with the shape of the laser beam coming from the collimator by showing the shape on my hand at a distance of 14m

      I'm not sure if the distortion of the laser is the fault of the secondary mirror or the lens(es) in the bottom of the eyepiece mount. I'm also not sure if this distortion is what is causing the inability to focus the scope, but I suspect that both issues are symptoms of the same problem.
      I'd appreciate any ideas on what to do next to resolve the focus issue. 
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.