tom.yates Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Just thinking of buying a new scope 16" reflector f12 do you think the EQ3 would take the the weight or do you thing i may be PUSHING IT A LITTLE PAST IT LIMIT ???? or would i be better just getting a 14" instead.Tom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 or just go for an EQ5, the choice is yours.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 You would probably be best to mount the 16" dob with a piggy backed 6" refractor on the EQ3.The extra weight might steady the mount up slightly.I think that Greg & Steve are the guys to ask about this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom.yates Posted December 4, 2005 Author Share Posted December 4, 2005 Thanks for that Jamie i think you could be right .Waiting with baited breath for the answer from the lads should be intresting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Should be.Good to see that you got home ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 I take it there was an undermounted scope at the Star Party? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted December 4, 2005 Share Posted December 4, 2005 Why waste money Lads? the EQ1 would be perfectly good enough although the Alt Azm mount may just edge it. Piggybacking a 6" refractor is just silly IMHO you should think about having two and use them as a Bino.James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 No, no, no, you're going about it all wrong.......Don't bother spending all your money on expensive mounts, just buy a Toucam pro (Preferably pre-flocked of course) throw it away and just use the little bendy table-top tripod it comes with!Tested to 45lb's..........More than enough to take those large Newts over 12" and piggy backed APO's!Greg!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 :clouds1: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLO Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 It might help to know whats behind the jibes:Greg and I had a 5" refractor to test and being a bit lazy/reckless we simply piggy-backed it on Greg's 8" Newtonian/EQ-3 setup. We posted a pic some time ago and waited for all the comments ... but none came? At the Star Meet we discovered it was just that the others had taken us for a couple of loons and were holding their tongues so as not to offend. Once they realised, the floodgates opened! We should have taken flame-proof suits!!! Heres the pic:Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 :clouds1: :clouds2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Ah, I get it now!!I would n't put a 5" refractor or a 8" reflector on an EQ3, never mind both.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLO Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Nevertheless, we've had some fine views using the 8" Newt/EQ3 setup and it motors along smoothly enough.Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 I'm a bit of a "wobble [removed word]", some people get bothered by false colour in refractors, some by coma in short reflectors. My "thing" is the wobbles.....does my head in!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.