johninderby Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 Telescope Service does a suitable L bracket.Starway L-Bracket from TS-Optics - 90° mounting armhttp://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/language/en/info/p1540_Starway-L-Halterung---Montage-von-Optiken-um-90--versetzt.htmlJohn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 Yep, that's the one I've got. Works very wellStu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iwatkins Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 I like this one from 365astro: L-Bracket Camera Platform for Porta, Merlin, GIAZ, Autotrack wit [Lac-PLATL] - 39.00 : 365Astronomy: Discovery for every day!CheersIan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RikM Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 I like this one from 365astro: L-Bracket Camera Platform for Porta, Merlin, GIAZ, Autotrack wit [Lac-PLATL] - 39.00 : 365Astronomy: Discovery for every day!CheersIanLooks just like the one that comes with the AZ4. Smashing bit of kit that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark at Beaufort Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 I bought my L Bracket from SCS Astro see attached link - Orion VersaGo II Altazimuth Mount. - SCS AstroThe Orion 5052 bracket is only £25 which I bought at Astrofest this year.Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K Nixon Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 Got a PST about two months ago. I seem to have jinxed the weather. darn it.Anyway, has anyone used the ceemax eyepieces with it? do they make any difference? I can't help but think with a little nudging the surface granulation would come leaping out more easily, but then maybe I just need to pop my new decent planetary eyepiece in there. I wouldn't know how well it word with that yet, the only thing I have seen through it is the dog...cheersKieron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iwatkins Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 Never tried the Cemax EPs myself, but by all accounts they are ok, nothing special.CheersIan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K Nixon Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 Their write ups suggest they improve the contrast greatly, but I wondered if they were just very pretty brass eyepieces and that was it.if so they're pricey!K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 I was tempted to try these but the reviews seem to suggest that they are not much, if any, better than other decent quality ep's. Certainly didn't get any confidence that granulation would be better with them.Stu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Drew Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 I don't rate the Cemax eyepieces either, they do match the livery of the PST though. Surface texture is more a function of the tuning and transparency of the air in my experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningMajor Posted April 10, 2012 Author Share Posted April 10, 2012 the only thing I have seen through it is the dog...Your dog must shine brightly!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K Nixon Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 Your dog must shine brightly!!I would write a correction, but i think i stands better like that...Anyway thanks all, for the advice, I shall get the decent planetary lens I was considering for the nocturnal astronomy and use that (two birds with one stone and all)cheersKieron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu_2011 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 HiI actually like the CEMAX lenses, I find them better contrast, easier to use and better eye relief than my Baader orthos in my PST. With everything astronomy, personal views on equipment are great but what works for some doesn't always work for others. You need to really try kit and see if it works for you.I was fortunate enough to buy a completed used set of CEMAX lenses for $99 on a recent work trip to California. Not sure I would pay £250 for the set but was happy to spend £65 ish. The 25 mm isn't much use as its too low mag, apart from that I use them all the time.ThanksSent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K Nixon Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 I was fortunate enough to buy a completed used set of CEMAX lenses for $99 on a recent work trip to California. Not sure I would pay £250 for the set but was happy to spend £65 ish. The 25 mm isn't much use as its too low mag, apart from that I use them all the time.Right. I won't go out of my way for them then, but I will keep an eye on ebay.cheers!K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningMajor Posted April 15, 2012 Author Share Posted April 15, 2012 Had another go today - in between the cloud cover - got some nice prominences, getting the hang of the focussing - but still can't get any surface detail 0 that could be a focus thing - the edge looks sharp but everything else is just red - doesn't help i guess that there aren't any decent sun spots to use as reference - will carry on practicing - but I do enjoy this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iwatkins Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 That doesn't sound good. There was loads of surface detail today, should have been very obvious.Are you focusing as well as turning the Etalon tuning ring? I tend to focus, then tune, then focus, then tune etc. That seems to work for me.CheersIan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningMajor Posted April 15, 2012 Author Share Posted April 15, 2012 That doesn't sound good. There was loads of surface detail today, should have been very obvious.Are you focusing as well as turning the Etalon tuning ring? I tend to focus, then tune, then focus, then tune etc. That seems to work for me.Now I'm depressed ! I guess it's experience - I hope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningMajor Posted April 15, 2012 Author Share Posted April 15, 2012 What power EP are you using Ian? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RikM Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Looking in white light today I counted 14 spots in 4 groups with good sized white faculae around the larger groups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iwatkins Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Similar to Rik view wise today. White light not very busy, but some excellent detail.In Ha, I used the supplied 20mm (I always do to get my eye in), detail easily seen, but very smal. Then switched to an 18mm BGO, excellent view, then a cheapo falling apart 11mm Plos and then an 8mm Baader Hyperion (too much mag. today). In all cases, detail easy to see. If you are not seeing good proms and a good collection of surface detainous hen you tune the Etalon, I would suggest there is something wrong with yours. Even with the supplied EP, you should be seeing real detail on the surface.CheersIan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulallen1978 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 I really want to get a solar scope, but am holding off and saving up for a Lunt 60THa. It's really difficult though because I have the cash and wifey approval (encouragement even!) to get a PST now. I am just worried about the 'sweet spot' issue. I think I would rather save up the extra and get a something that is easier to look/image through.Rik,I just bought a Lunt 60TPT with feather touch focuser and B1200 blocking filter. I've personally never looked through a PST, so I can only speak from the Lunt perspective, but I am VERY happy with my purchase. The view of the sun is impressive and I would encourage you to hold off on getting a PST if you can get the money together for a Lunt before the transit of Venus. If you won't be able to save enough by then for a Lunt, then a PST is not a bad way to go and you could always turn around and sell it for close to retail when it comes time to upgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RikM Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Rik,I just bought a Lunt 60TPT with feather touch focuser and B1200 blocking filter. I've personally never looked through a PST, so I can only speak from the Lunt perspective, but I am VERY happy with my purchase. The view of the sun is impressive and I would encourage you to hold off on getting a PST if you can get the money together for a Lunt before the transit of Venus. If you won't be able to save enough by then for a Lunt, then a PST is not a bad way to go and you could always turn around and sell it for close to retail when it comes time to upgrade.Cheers Paul. I've compared the views through a PST, Lunt60 and Solarmax II 60. The Lunt is easily my fave but...I have decided that Ha solar viewing is not as much fun as DSO imaging, so a CCD camera takes priority. I turn 40 in October so will get a PST then, and the money I would have put towards the Lunt can go on an Atik 314L+ at Christmas instead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cathalferris Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 I find that it can take up to 30 seconds before my brain can see the low-contrast surface detail with any ease. I've found that to tune the PST before I have the "training" completed, I just turn the tuning ring so that the darker band is central on the disk. If you don't see a vague darker band (or seeing the disk appear a little bit darker for one position of the tuning ring) then it may need to be checked out.When the darker portion is central, I then rest, while not moving my eye around, and after a little bit the h-alpha surface detail simply pops out at me, and once that happens I can rove around and fine-tune the tuning to my hearts content. It does take a little bit of time to get the eye used to the monochromatic light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithatrochdale Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Had another go today - in between the cloud cover - got some nice prominences, getting the hang of the focussing - but still can't get any surface detail 0 that could be a focus thing - the edge looks sharp but everything else is just red - doesn't help i guess that there aren't any decent sun spots to use as reference - will carry on practicing - but I do enjoy this!Could this be that you have not got one of the "good" PSTs?There do seem to be some that do not perform as well as others; perhaps you could return it to your supplier and exchange it for another one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlin66 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Keith, early days.....As mentioned, getting the eye retrained to see the Ha detail takes practice; as does the co-ordination of the focus and tuning...the "Vegemite Precise Focus" certainly can help. A 10mm eyepiece works well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.