Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Mix different length subs?


Recommended Posts

The tutorial is excellent and the technique the best I've tried. However, it is usually not necessary to use different sub lengths, M42 being the classic example of when it is. One sees lots of beginners mixing arbitrary collections of sub length with no coherent plan in mind and this is pointless. Make your subs as long as the guiding, the LP, the camera thermal noise and the point of saturation will allow. DSLR users might find short subs for star colour a help though.

Lodigruss's technique can also be used on different stretches of the same data, something I do often for galaxy cores, for example. Sometimes I'm lazy and just put the short 'core' stretch under the main stretch and use a feathered, low opacity eraser to remove the saturated parts.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a thought, is it ever an advantage to stack subs of differing lengths? or does it muck up the averaging?

I certainly wouldn't do it. I'd make different stacks of different sub length - and then only rarely. This image of the Pleiades had shortest exposures of ten minutes at F3.9 with a sensitive Atik 4000 camera. While the bright cores are over exposed, you have to look at other images of the cluster and wonder if it is really possible to get much greater control;

http://ollypenrice.smugmug.com/Photography/Widefield-images-including/i-DPrc68n/0/X3/M45-COMPOSITE-FIN-sRGB-X3.jpg

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.