Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_31.thumb.jpg.b7a41d6a0fa4e315f57ea3e240acf140.jpg

Orion and Running Man


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think that is one of the outstanding virtues of Digital photography. You can take the same data, and process it in an almost infinite number of ways, and as long as you save the original work, you can always go "back to square one"! Enjoy, experiment, and learn. The whole thing is really a matter of personal taste, after all !

Jim S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Much better.

Although there is noise showing now, it's better than the effect of the noise reduction you used on the original, and, as I mentioned earlier, to get past the noise you need lots of time on target.

I shot over 6 hours on this region earlier this year with a CCD camera, and could really do with double that to get past the noise in the faint areas.

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

The second is more subtle and more honestly reflects what is really in the data. What I think is that you would have done better with different sub lengths. 60 seconds is too long for the Trapezium and 240 seconds not long enough for the dust.

In my version I used 10, 50, 300 and 600 secs. The 10 minute subs were at F3.9 as well. The rest were at F5.3. If you want the dust without noise reduction (which I hate using ) you need long subs and a lot of them. Because I've imaged the region several times with guests I've accumulated about 22 hours of data and this makes life easy!

Anyway, welcome to SGL.

Olly

Edited by ollypenrice
Link to post
Share on other sites

I enjoyed the artistic flare in the first one I have to say hence my comment 'unusual rendition' but I do prefer the more faithful second version. Noise is the issue here and more subs. are the answer as already suggested by others. The joys of digital processing - so many different ways to represent and object!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The processing side of imaging is so much fun you can get out there at night and capture all that lovely data and then the next day enjoy working on your images and you just cant beat the thrill you get when the final stacked image appears in deep sky stacker that is like opening an astronomical Christmas present and I luvs it I doos.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.