Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Earl

1 Divided by 2 = more than 2 halves?

Recommended Posts

If you have 1 and nothing else at all, divide this in half, you have 2 halves but have also in the process formed a third state which is in-between or now contains both halves?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You've rediscovered the Pythagorean doctrine of number (from about 500BC). First there is nothing, but it is only one nothing, so there is one. And the nothing together with the one make two. And the two together with the one make three...

You've re-stated it by saying that at first there was one and nothing else, which gave you a two and hence the possibility of halving. But you don't define "between". For the Pythagoreans the sequence is purely consecutive because of the way it's produced.

A more modern and mathematically rigorous version of the idea (which sorts out the problem of ordering) is the successor function.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Successor_ordinal

Edited by acey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.