Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Apparent magnitude in binary systems


Recommended Posts

If two stars have the same apparent magnitude in a close binary system and you know the mag og the system, do you just half it to find the mag of each star. ie if mag is 2.2 then each star is 4.4?

Thanks for any pointers on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google:

combined magnitude

The total brightest of two or more celestial objects, such as the stars of a binary system that appear as a single point to the naked eye. Unfortunately, this can't be found simply by adding the separate magnitudes, m1 and m2, because the magnitude scale is logarithmic. Instead the combined magnitude, m, has to be calculated from the formula:

m = m1 - 2.5 log {1 + antilog [-0.4 (m2 - m1)]}.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

m = m1 - 2.5 log {1 + antilog [-0.4 (m2 - m1)]}

2.2 = m2 - 2.5 log {1 + antilog [-0.4 (m2 - m2)]}

2.2 = m2 - 2.5 log {1 + antilog [0]}

2.2 = m2 - 2.5 log 2

2.2 = m2 - 2.5 * 0.3 (approx)

m2 = 2.2 + (2.5 * 0.3)

m2 = 2.2 + 0.75

m2 = 2.95

Fixed it ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
If two stars have the same apparent magnitude in a close binary system and you know the mag og the system, do you just half it to find the mag of each star. ie if mag is 2.2 then each star is 4.4?

Thanks for any pointers on this one.

You add 0.75, as has been shown. We can do it more quickly, though, starting from the definition

magnitude difference = 2.5log(brightness ratio).

In this case the ratio is 2 (one star is half as bright as the combined pair) hence the magnitude difference is 2.5log(2) = 0.75. For the particular example we get 2.2 + 0.75 = 2.95, but you would add the same amount whatever the combined magnitude, e.g. an equal pair of combined magnitude 3 would have individual stars of magnitude 3.75.

We can easily generalise it further: if there were three close stars of equal magnitude then their individual magnitudes would differ by 2.5log(3) = 1.19 from the combined figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.