Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Opinions, please.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It depends on what you mean by "alive". The one thing that all "alive" entities share is that they have evolved. Where's mommy-Sun? What's the inheritance mechanism? That's the kind of questions your friend should be thinking about if he/she wants to convince others.

Sentient? I am not going down that one. Nobody has a clue what that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Karen, but I think your friend is wrong. A sentient being would mean that it thinks and bases it's actions on those thoughts accordingly.

To my basic grasp of things, our sun is just a huge ball of nuclear fusion and will just keep on creating nuclear reacions until it's fuel has run out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are looking down the Buddhist principle of the sentient then the principle that an object formed of many things depicts its existence and being can also be awarded to a bottle of white spirit. However if you are relating to the same principle of a beating heart which sends oxygenated blood around a system for life then thats a different question entirely. Id base it on actual psyical matter, what do various entities perform, can life sustain itself without light or heat, when the sun finally dies in around 5 billion years time will not mankind have instigated some other form of life.

My own principle is therefor, what do you depict as alive? is a stone a living thing? not a highly moralistic question but one really based on the laws of Physics and how physics and biology may work together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IIRC, classical biological science defines a living entity as one that exhibits all of the following traits:


  • [li]Movement[/li]
    [li]Excretion[/li]
    [li]Reproduction[/li]
    [li]Respiration[/li]
    [li]Irritability[/li]
    [li]Nutrition[/li]
    [li]Growth[/li]

Sentience is not a requirement. From the above, I'd say the sun was not a living entity. Nor are hills. Internet Trolls, unfortunately, are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This reminds me of an otherwise intelligent person I met while working on Tesla coils. He and his wife were aquaintances of Bert Hickman, a well known Tesla hobbyist. I met them with the hopes of being put into contact with Bert, (which they did), but along the way his wife asked what I thought of the Sun. Well, you know me, I went a little overboard describing my observations and the Sun's workings. She looked at me quizzically and asked, "So, are you sure it's not hollow and housing an ancient, advanced civilization that's monitoring the Human Race?"

I did like Vega and ran for the hills.

I can very much confirm the Sun is not alive, nor sentient in any definable way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.