Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

19.5 hour Bubble in 2 nights!


ollypenrice

Recommended Posts

What a run of nights at the moment! Flat calm, clear, dry and with FWHMs of around 1.5 you can't fail. I took this with SGL member Branchman. It has 10 hours of Ha (4 of which I took with Tom O'Donoghue last year), 130mins per colour channel and 3 hours of Luminance.

Tricky to deal with the blue stars against the Ha background but I dreamed up a new way of doing it which no doubt has already been dreamed up many times. Though it took a day to process that was the only really hard part. Every sub was used and the EM200 continues to shine, viz the guide trace below.

BUBBLE-HaLRGB20HRS-scnr-X2.jpg

PS sorry about hte red artefact top right, now corrected.

post-15040-133877669244_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, but it has been a long time coming. It seems the mount didn't like my other guide cameras for some reason and also needed a shim to reduce end float in the Dec worm. But now we are getting our five grand's worth I guess! About time and thanks to Pieter Vandevelde for the idea.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great image Olly as usual but for 19.5 hours its looking a little noisy still in the Red background channel, what camera did you use, an OSC???

Reading more closely above its not clear to me, at least it must be a mono ccd for the H Alpha part taken last year. Can you post the H Alpha as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great image Olly as usual but for 19.5 hours its looking a little noisy still in the Red background channel, what camera did you use, an OSC???

Reading more closely above its not clear to me, at least it must be a mono ccd for the H Alpha part taken last year. Can you post the H Alpha as well?

You're right, Neil and I've gone back to it to look at that this morning. All this was in the mono camera. The background Ha is very faint in places so ten hours wouldn't nail the noise at F7. But I'm not up for another ten!! I should have given the Ha more NR on the faint signal, really. Here's a cleaned version and the Ha. I can live with it I reckon.

Olly

BUBBLE-IN-Ha-X2.jpg

BUBBLE-HaLRGBcleaned-X2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers Jordan,

I've been thinking hard about stellar processing recently and have come up with a few things that work for me. Here's one; put a copy image underneath. Get the star colour on that that as right as you can. Blur the image big time. Up the saturation. The idea is to blur the true star colour deeper into the stellar cores. Now go to the top image and magic wand select the key stars. Expand and feather the selection, then erase over the lot to let the intense blurred star colour through from below. That big blue nuisance above the Bubble had this to get a hint of blue into the white. It looks miles better for it.

I never used to pay enough attention to the stars but now I think they are really important. If ever I reduce them I up their brightness at the same time or they just look like mushy flecks.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simply stunning Olly with ridiculous guiding I can only dream off. The bubble really shows well in the dep red neb colours and have managed perfectly not to "over do" the image.

Interesting reading your processing techniques, I am too concentrating on stars more in the overall image.

Envy yournkit and location and of course talent :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.