Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Watec 120N+


Stu

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Have just acquired one of these from the forum, yet to be used but hopefully tonight if the weather plays nicely :-)

I will probably use it most in my 4" refractor, but am also interested in seeing the results in the mak. I bought a 0.5x reducer a while back but never cracked getting focus with it!

Anyone using a watec? Any useful tips?

Cheers

Stu

Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Watec is indeed a wonderful thing - And should give few problems, in either a refractor or catadiopteric scope. It is however interesting to extend the FIELD capabilities with "Reducers" (or Barlows). If you are using a typical Atik-type 0.5x reducer, a couple of (long and short) "C-thread" adaptors can be useful. Idem a few extension tubes.

http://www.opticstar.com/Run/Astronomy/Astro-Accessories-Imagers.asp?p=0_10_5_0_3

Also e.g "Modern Astronomy", "Rother Valley Optics" etc. :rolleyes:

It isn't always easy to find the NEW focus, but the predictive power of: Focal Reducer Calculator

- Can help. Worth saving the "website complete". This useful utility tends to disappear from time to time! :glasses2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many thanks Macavity, I will give those a go.

I have a frame grabber which I will try, but first off I think I will just connect to a small lcd tv screen to find the focus point.

I'm interested to see what happens with the mak. I guess on brighter objects it should be fine, but at f20, will need the reducer to show the fainter objects?

Stu

Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got my Watec from Opticstar about 3 years ago and love it. In light polluted skies it enables me to see DSOs (and Comets) that just aren't visible visually. Here is a link to a few pictures - mainly photos of the TV screen. The actual view of the TV screen is a lot better than the photo. Most were taken with a f3.3 focal reducer. Now getting better results with an IR filter https://picasaweb.google.com/mike.brightmore/RemoteAstronomyOn29April2009#

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.