Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Book to help with maths for astrophysics needed


Recommended Posts

Can anyone recommend a good maths text book to help with the equations in astrophysics. I've just read Ian Morrison's 'Introduction to Astronomy and Cosmology' and although it said the maths wasn't difficult I found a lot of the ways he rearranged equations quite confusing. He also kept referring to speeds as kms followed by -1 in place where you'd put a 2 for squared. If you've read the book you'll know what I mean. Why has he done this? I only have O level maths and physics.

Any help much appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

kms-1 means km/s, kilometers per second. Similarly for acceleration you might have seen kms-2, which is km/s2. So the minus sign is showing that that unit is on the denominator.

This comes from 'scientific notation', which is an easy way to keep track of the magnitude of a number (the important bit). Instead of writing down a big number, you write down how many 'powers of ten' it has. So, for example;

100 = 102 (100 = 10x10)

1000 = 103 (1000 = 10x10x10)

1 = 100

0.1 = 1/10 = 10-1

0.00001 = 10-5

This becomes fantastically powerful when you start dealing with numbers much bigger/smaller than 1. For example, the sun has a mass of 2x1030 kg. It's mostly made of Hydrogen, which has a mass of about 1.7x10-27 kg. So I can v quickly work out there are about 1057 protons in the Sun. Much easier than writing the numbers out long hand and multiplying :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^ and uses a lot less ink !

/pedantic hat on

Just a thought, if there are Avagadros number (6 x 10 to 23) of protons (ignore electon masses for simplicity) in 1g of hydrogen.

There would be 6.3 x 10 to 30 in 1kg.

Multiplying up, that would give 6 x 1.7 x 10 to 57 = 10 to 58

Not a big difference in the scale of things, but a factor of 10 anyway.

/pedantic hat off - waiting for someone to point where I have made the error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought, if there are Avagadros number (6 x 10 to 23) of protons (ignore electon masses for simplicity) in 1g of hydrogen.

There would be 6.3 x 10 to 30 in 1kg.

Multiplying up, that would give 6 x 1.7 x 10 to 57 = 10 to 58

Not a big difference in the scale of things, but a factor of 10 anyway.

/pedantic hat off - waiting for someone to point where I have made the error.

Don't quite follow your working? but based on 6x1023 H in a gram;

103 grams in a kilogram...

So 6x1026 H in a kilogram

So 6x1026 H/kg x 2x1030 kg in Sun = 12x1026+30 = 1.2x1057 H in Sun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone recommend a good maths text book to help with the equations in astrophysics. I've just read Ian Morrison's 'Introduction to Astronomy and Cosmology' and although it said the maths wasn't difficult I found a lot of the ways he rearranged equations quite confusing. He also kept referring to speeds as kms followed by -1 in place where you'd put a 2 for squared. If you've read the book you'll know what I mean. Why has he done this? I only have O level maths and physics.

Any help much appreciated.

I was going to do this course with the OU, but decided on another one. Anyway, I have the course material and it is available used from Amazon, it might help. It certainly covers what is being discussed here.

Maths for Science: Amazon.co.uk: S. Jordan, S. Ross, P. Murphy: Books

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to do this course with the OU, but decided on another one. Anyway, I have the course material and it is available used from Amazon, it might help. It certainly covers what is being discussed here.

Maths for Science: Amazon.co.uk: S. Jordan, S. Ross, P. Murphy: Books

If we're talking OU astrophysics, there's a LOT of pre requisite maths to learn. That one course I would suggest is not enough by a long shot.

What aspect of astrophysics are you looking at OP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're talking OU astrophysics, there's a LOT of pre requisite maths to learn. That one course I would suggest is not enough by a long shot.

Of course not... But if he starting from SI units for speed, then a good starting point possibly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't quite follow your working? but based on 6x1023 H in a gram;

103 grams in a kilogram...

So 6x1026 H in a kilogram

So 6x1026 H/kg x 2x1030 kg in Sun = 12x1026+30 = 1.2x1057 H in Sun

And there is the error...

I made 6x1023 x 1000 = 6x1030, rather than 6x1026 as it should have been.

Probably mixed up the power 30 in your original post. Should have written it down, but it'd take too much ink.

Re-reading your post, I see you were taliking about protons, rather than Hydrogen nuclei (not that makes any difference to the error I made).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.