Ages ago when I was a boy I discovered this wonderful hobby with the most low end department store reflector you can imagine (no, no, cheaper than that). Then about 20 or so years ago my interest rekindled, I bought a reflector on clearance which got little use and put away. Now the embers have caught flame again and I'm determined to stick with it this time. The telescope bought years back is being put back into service. It's a Tasco Galaxsee 114mm x 500mm (~F4.3) reflector. Fortunately, in my research I've done I've found it's not a Bird-Jones as I feared for a bit, however, I can't find out for sure if the mirror is spherical or parabolic (I've seen it claimed both ways). Like many others I've had one of the plastic clamps on one of the tripod legs break. My temp fix didn't work out so well, so I decided to find a replacement (easier said than done for a single leg). I ended up buying a Celestron Firstscope 114mm x 900mm (F-8) reflector, mainly as a parts scope for the tripod, but also because it had a couple of other parts I wanted and otherwise couldn't find.
So the Celestron in some ways is a little worse for wear, but I think I'm going to end up with two functioning scopes. The main problem with the Tasco has been the tripod and mount (no surprise I'm sure). The Celestron mount and tripod seem to be a little beefier, plus it has tube rings which the Tasco doesn't. Also the parts on the Celestron mount that I wanted are for mounting an RA drive. I actually got a Tasco RA drive by happenstance back in the mid-80's but was never able to mount it to the Tasco I got because I lacked the other parts. So, my thinking is that I'll mount the Tasco OTA to the Celestron EQ mount and tripod (and as soon as I can find it again, the RA drive). That should make a decent little rich field telescope. The Celestron needs a little more attention. It came in pretty rough shape. Lots of dirt, bit of rust on some of the screws, but mainly the knobs, the piece they attach to, and the piece that holds them to the focuser are missing. Also after pulling out the focuser tube, some of the teeth on that are in pretty bad shape. The good news is the mirrors and the rest of the OTA seem to be good shape. At first looking down the tube it looked like the primary mirror had a chip and a stress crack on it. After removing the primary cell I was relieved to find it was only a bit of debris. Other than dirt the primary looks to be good. I'm not sure yet how I'm going to fix the focuser problem (has to be inexpensive, as in CHEAP as in my CFO is already a little annoyed at my buying a second scope). But I figure once I have that problem solved and I get the OTA cleaned up, I'll build a dob base for it, thus a second scope a little more geared towards moon and planetary viewing. Do I need two telescopes? No. Do I want two telescopes, each dedicated to viewing different types of objects? Yes. I'm going to see what I can squeeze out of these two. If nothing else, it'll be an interesting project.