Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

PhilPassmore

New Members
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

41 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Location
    Nottinghamshire UK

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. That's correct Alan, and the plugs as you may have noticed have coloured collars, which denote whether they are 5 or 12v. I have also 'spiral wrapped' my various wires together to keep them organised. I have also bought a cheap length of 12v rubber heater strip from AliExpress, and have found that running it at 5v instead gives it a nice level of heat as a dew heater and self regulates without any control electronic components .
  2. Had a few occasions when the supplied power connectors on various pieces of kit have proven to be very unreliable, so decided to try and do better; These pictures are of my solution, which is very simple but good and robust. A plastic box, fitted with ten 3 pin locking sockets. Each socket is supplied with 12v on one pin, 5v on nother, and a commonground. This allows any five or 12 volt device to be wired into the matching plug, so it picks up the required voltage, regardless of the socket they are plugged into. I have also fitted two 'legacy' power connectors, and a couple of USB sockets too. The box can be supplied from mains power, and utilise the built in 12 volt power supply, together with fan cooling. Alternatively, it is wired to accept 12v into the box directly. I have been using a E-bike battery pack, fed through a 'buck' converter to drop the voltage.
  3. Here is my very first 'stacked' image of M42, produced from about 50 thirty second subs, manually triggered because the camera I am using doesn't have any sort of remote facility or intervalometer. I have modified the camera myself (Panasonic GF3, micro 4/3) by removing the IR filter.
  4. This is just a quicky in my series of DIY (mis) adventures. I rather fancied the idea of one of the nice big chunky 'Losmandy' style dovetail plates, to complement the rigidity of my recently acquired EQ6 mount with my 150mm refractor (and also perhaps with a big reflector still under construction). However, they seemed quite expensive for what they are, so I just had to have a go myself. I bought a piece of flat aluminium 12mm thick and just over 70mm wide. Length is 500mm, and it cost me about £15. Originally the plan had been to mount the strip on an angle and mill the edge to the correct dovetail angle (which seems to be 60 or 30 degrees depending where you measure). It was however glaringly obvious that my dinky little mill just didn't have the capacity, so an alternative was sought. I have previously used a mitre chop saw with tungsten carbide tipped blade on aluminium, so I decided to give my similarly equiped table saw a go at the job. I wound the blade to the appropriate angle, and took it down to the minimum required to just deal with the metal thickness. I then took a whole load of very thin passes to cut first one side and then the other, using the saws fence to guide it. At this point, I have to say, probably in block capitals and underlined; if you are going to try this yourself, be bl@@dy careful. Use a pusher stick and keep your fingers miles from the blade. It will take no prisoners, and your digits will come off (literally) second best. Also wear good eye protection, as it makes a lot of very fine chips! It actually produces a reasonable finish, even if not milling machine standard. All edges were deburred, then it was drilled and countersunk to suit the mounting points I required.
  5. Thanks for all the feedback, it's what I value, whether it's supportive of the way I have done things or if it's offering alternatives. It's how we learn and grow. I am very new to the astronomy scene and have so much to take on board.
  6. I have said in other threads that I am new to astronomy, so if the direction I take in the search for great viewing takes a somewhat contrary turn that conflicts with general wisdom, please forgive me, it's just in my nature to get an idea stuck in my head and pursue it to my conclusion. This posting is about what is usually at the heart of all of our quests, a telescope that meets our needs. For some it is a good pair of binoculars, for others it's the biggest Maksutov that they can persuade their other halves to allow them to buy (or be single, or very good at keeping secrets). Having done a bit of exploring using a 250mm Dob with very questionable silvering (another project), I decided that there was little in the telescope world that couldn't be enhanced by increasing the aperture. There is after all, nothing to take the place of photons. The lure of a big refractor was strong, and there seemed a toss up between 'big' with very nice glass (and probably three slices of it), or 'very big' with less exotic silicon, and only two bits. The problem for me, is that in reality, both would be stretching my budget. So, in a fashion that those who know me would understand, I decided to build one myself. I know that cheap glass is probably frowned on, but I decided to give it a go. I bought a 154mm f 7.8 doublet from China, together with an aluminium cell to mount it in. This cell mounts onto a sectikn of common brown underground drainage pipe of almost the perfect diameter. A snug fit of the cell was ensured by using the 'soft' side of seld adhesive velcro strips. The cell is secured with three countersunk set screws. I could have taken the easy route and kept the tube the same diameter for its whole length, but it would have been extremely heavy and unwieldy, and finding mounting rings would have been more difficult and expensive. So originally, I stepped down a size in drainage pipe, which was ok, but still very heavy, and the thick walls of the pipe presented problems when mounting the focuser at the other end. So I made the switch to carbon fibre tube for the aft section. The two sections are linked with two very snug fitting delrin (a plastic) 'doughnuts', which with a good bearing surface area, and sufficient spacing ensure the tubes remain perfectly parallel. Again machine screws are used to secure both tubes to tbe delrin. The focuser mount is machined from aluminium, and internally threaded to accept the focusser screwing directly into it. A little silicon grease is used on the threads to prevent galling and binding that can sometimes happen on aluminium. The mount is secured in the carbon tube with yet another set of machine screws. Both tubes are lacking baffles (not got round to it), but they are both fully flocked with adhesive and flocking powder. It's a messy operation, but personally I think that the result is extremely good, to the extent I may not bother baffling. As you can see in the pictures, I have secured a handle onto the mounting rings, which are an off the shelf item with about half the thickness of the soft padding removed to get the fit onto the tube just right. The handle is designed for a camera carrying rig, but works well with helping get the scope onto its mount. On the opposite side of the rings to the dovetail rail I have fitted a bit of carbon fibre box section tube just to aid maintain straightness and parallelism. It has the added bonus of acting as a very coarse 'finder scope' by sighting through its length. I haven't got a lit to compare it to, but I am happy with it. It was great fun to build and incredibly satisfying to use. There is of course a significant blue fringe as its 'only' an achromat, but the addition of a Baader 'Fringe Killer' has made a huge reduction without cutting out too much light. Things to improve (aren't there always?) ; Perhaps doing the baffling as mentioned above, and coming up with a collimation system for the lens cell. As ever, feedback, questions and constructive criticism are welcome.
  7. I was getting a little frustrated with my slightly clumsy adjustments to focus. Each attempt at adjustment resulting in several seconds of scope movement and inability to view the outcome of any adjustment, meaning I was likely to miss the focus point and having to repeat several times. I have a dual speed Crayford style focuser, it's a relatively inexpensive Chinese import fitted to my refractor. I have tuned and modified the focuser itself to smooth it and improve the internal drive and support, but I will leave that for another posting. So the next step for me seemed to be installing a motorised focus system, so I wouldn't have to touch the optical assembly during focusing. A stepper motor linked to a driver board looked a cheap and effective solution, so using my usual source for such bits (AliExpress, no affiliation), I obtained both, with the driver able to run off five volts, so useable from a USB power bank or similar. I tapped a couple of existing holes on the focuser, and used them to mount the assembled brackets which were made from some offcuts of carbon fibre from another historic project. I would under normal circumstances have used aluminium, but the carbon was to hand. A piece of right angle was created from an offcut of box section tube. The bracket is slightly isolated from the focuser with some rubber spacer washers, and the motor is isolated with a commercial cork gasket. I removed the fine focus knob from the focuser, and connected it to the motor with an adapter that allows a measure of mis-alignment without causing any problems. The driver board has various start/stop modes, and I have set mine so one button drives one way, and the other drives it the other way, with releasing it stops the motor. There is a speed adjuster on the board, and it's quite fussy getting it to a speed that drives well and smoothly and reliably. I think the limited current capacity of the board causes some stalling issues. Hopefully the pictures show what they need to without further explanation, but any questions, please ask away. Phil.
  8. It certainly helps to dampen and stiffen things. Originally I only used the rectangular section pieces, but ran threaded rods down inside each box, and tightened into tension. Not actually sure the rods helped very much, I think all it did was change the resonant frequency. So in order to stiffen, I added the round section AND the concrete fill. Actually I think the concrete pile wobbles a bit too, so I am looking at adding three steel wires from the top of the column/bottom of the pier down to the concrete floor, a bit like tent guy ropes, and a turbuckle to tension them.
  9. Hi everyone. I am an absolutely inveterate tinkerer, fiddler, maker and breaker (with hopefully not too much of the last). I only came into astronomy properly about 6-9 months ago, with the acquisition of a horrible Tasco 4 1/2 inch reflector with some dreadful little 0.9 inch eyepieces. However, catching my very first glimpse of a very fuzzy blob that was slightly less than circular, and I confidently decided actually WAS Saturn. Things have latterly improved on the equipment front, and I hope that I don't bore the community too much by posting what will probably be mostly pictures and some little description of things that I have made or modified. This posting is to show the pier I have made to mount my EQ5 Goto mount onto. Currently I am viewing from a raised wooden deck on the back of the house, that has a pretty good view of the southern sky. However, being raised and wood, vibration posed a big problem, with the slightest movement while tripod mounted , setting the view rocking and roling all over the place. My solution to that, was to switch to a pier base, attached to a concrete pillar, cast in some plastic drainpipe and set into the underlaying concrete yard surface. The pillar comes up to just below the deck surface, and has three threaded rods set into it that allow a reasonably easy and quick means of mounting the pier in a fairly accurately repeatable position, meaning the mount doesn't have to be polar aligned every time I want to use it. The pier was made from aluminium rather than steel, with a circular central tube, and three sort of outrigger rectangular box sections around the outside of the round tube. I chose aluminium because mostly it was what I had laying around but also because it would be a little lighter to mount and dismount. This latter benefit was pretty much lost when I decided to fill the central round part of the pier with concrete to stiffen and dampen resonances. I an passable at aluminium welding with a decent TIG welder I bought to do a van to Camper conversion during lockdown.The pier was made at a height that would provide comfortable general viewing, but I also made an extra extension piece that adds enough to make overhead viewing through a long refractor, reasonably comfortable. The base to actually mount the EQ mount onto required some lathe work ( I am blessed, having a Myford ML7 down in the shed). This base has three thumb screws to allow accurate leveling of the whole mount assembly. I hope this fits in with the purpose of the forum section, and I would welcome a little feedback as to whether I should post some of the other stuff I have done. Many thanks, Phil
  10. Thanks for the input. The mount won't be permanently on a pier, but I will only have to move it about 6 feet from the patio doors, to my permanent pier mount point, just level with, and isolated from, the deck 'viewing area'.
  11. Looking to upgrade my EQ5 goto mount, to an EQ 6 variant, and am wondering if having the combined AZ/EQ is worth the price premium? I really enjoy visual observing, but also quite like the challenge of astrophotography. Thoughts anyyone.
  12. My foster kids love seeing the planets too.
  13. Have started recently, and wishing I had learned about astronomy earlier in my life.
  14. Hope you manage to find some dark skies round Sheffield.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.