Jump to content

Banner.jpg.39bf5bb2e6bf87794d3e2a4b88f26f1b.jpg

Pitch Black Skies

Members
  • Posts

    275
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pitch Black Skies

  1. Something different for a change, a picture of the terminator in daylight. Date - 25th Nov 2021 Time - 10:10 Location - Ireland Phase - 0.71 Waning Gibbous Constellation - Cancer Magnitude - -12.20 Distance - 395659.14 km Diameter 30.20' Camera - Canon 800D Lens - 18-55mm Telescope - 130P-DS Mount - EQ5-Pro Method -One foreground picture at 55mm -One picture of the moon through the telescope -Cropped and edited in PS
  2. Apologies, I mis-read your post. I thought you were referring to the GPU. Once your spacing is rectified, consider upgrading the adaptor with the two thumbscrews to a compression ring with three thumbscrews. It gives a much more even and concentric fit, minimising the chance of tilt in the optical train.
  3. It should be much sharper, mine is. Are you sure you've the GPU? It doesn't change the focal length, thus you would still need to chop the focuser tube, I did. Back focus is 53mm for F4 but F5 can get away with 55mm which is basically just an 11mm t ring attached. How is your imaging train clamped together? Are thumbscrews, compression ring, etc? Edit: It does actually push the focus point out by a little if screwed directly onto the focuser tube.
  4. Can definitely see an improvement with the CC. Without it, it looks like seagulls in the top left corner. Much better corrected in top left with the CC. Without CC With CC This is in a 130P-DS yeah? How long were the exposures and do you know if the options are full collimated. The reason I ask is, I think the pics with the CC should be a little sharper.
  5. I took it for a quick test drive last night to see how it stacks up against my DSLR. Each image is only around 7 minutes integration time each with no calibration frames. Processed in ST. DSLR CMOS -very pleased with the results.
  6. That's odd. What does a single exposure without the CC look like?
  7. Congratulations on your EQ6R! I have the same setup, albeit riding on an uncertain EQ5. I have opted for the ZWO ASI533 MC-PRO after some digging around. If you can live with the square fov, the 533 has lower read noise (1.0e), higher QE (80% peak), and suffers zero amp glow. Paired with the 130P-DS under OK seeing conditions, it gives an ideal resolution of 1.19"/pixel. https://astronomy.tools/calculators/ccd_suitability Clear Skies
  8. My early Christmas present, thanks to @vallyman
  9. Yeah, it's definitely not something you would want to be rushing. Give yourself plenty of time, or maybe do an hour here and there over a few days. It can be a bit painstaking but I was also going to mention like you said, you have peace of mind. It's also very satisfying to know everything is squared up. It's a good opportunity to get to know your telescope better too, us Newton owners are tinkerers at heart. If my memory serves me correctly I think the chap accidentally broken his secondary mirror in that video I shared. Be super careful Ricochet's advice above is really good, it should really help narrow it down. Be sure to update when you've found the culprit!
  10. You're welcome. To go a step further than levelling the focuser, align it so that it is perpendicular to the opposite side of the tube. In fact this should be done before ever collimating the telescope IMO. This gent does a great job at explaining it. It starts at 27:15. Have you verified that the doughnut is centred while you had the primary out? It isn't really connected to the problem you're having with the off center laser dot, but it's good to know for that extra level of accuracy. I've had to recenter the primary spot on every new telescope I've bought so far. The template included with the Cats Eye by Jim Fly is a useful tool for this. BTW if the spider vanes are over tightened they can pull the OTA into an oval shape. Not a deal breaker, as long as the focuser is aligned and the secondary is concentric to it. Keep at it, you will figure it out.
  11. No. Tilting the primary doesn't move the dot out of the doughnut at all. The dot location on the primary is determined by how the secondary is reflecting the laser beam. To get accurate collimation one must always ensure the dot is in the centre of the primary prior to using the Barlowed laser technique for the primary alignment. Having said that, sometimes a laser can have one believe the secondary is collimated by showing the dot in the centre of the primary. Under closer inspection one might find that the secondary is slightly rotated and tilted more on one side to account for it. I was a big fan of using a laser for collimation too but after more experience I am now wary of them for the reasons listed above. IMO a very accurate way to collimate is by using a Cheshire sightube for the secondary alignment, then ensure it is rotated properly and that the three primary clips are even in the secondary. Then simply use a collimation cap to ensure the primary is collimated. As you peer through the collimation cap everything should look completely concentric. When you know everything is completely concentric, then pop your laser in to see if it agrees. If it does, there might have been a slight tilt in your secondary. If it doesn't, the problem is with the laser, and from experience it is possibly with how it is seated in the holder.
  12. Despite starting with a 6" dob myself, and progressing to an 8", and then finally to a 12". I think if like you mentioned your main interest is the moon, Saturn and Jupiter. A better choice for these targets would be a mak. I would still echo what the others have said though, dobs are a great beginner scope. They are good at a lot of things and give plenty of bang for the buck. Either way, I hope you have fun with the hobby, and welcome to the best forum on the internet!
  13. To be honest a lot of that has gone completely over my head but I will revisit in the future and can hopefully make some sense of it when I have accumulated more knowledge and experience. For my image I just copied this gentleman's tutorial on YouTube. That is all I am really capable of at the moment.
  14. "ASIAIR PRO is a smart WiFi device that allows you to control all ASI USB 3.0 cameras, ASI Mini series cameras, and Mainstream DSLR cameras. (It can not support ASI120MM/MC camera)" Does that mean the ASI120mm Mono guidecam is not supported?
  15. I don't know enough about it but it seems like a great piece of equipment. Maybe it is something I will progress to.
  16. I would opt for the WiFi adapter over the cable for the luxury of controlling the mount from indoors, however I am restricted by 1m camera usb cable. My camera has Bluetooth and WiFi capability but I can't seem to get NINA to detect it other than connecting via the USB cable.
  17. Wow, thanks so much! That is absolutely amazing. I had a suspicion that my coma corrector might need to move a mm or 2 closer to the sensor. I think I had the focuser thumbscrew lock too tight which was tilting the focuser tube ever so slightly. I'm waiting for a clear night to do some more experimenting. How did you get so much detail? Could I do this myself in Startools? (Cranking out 5sec exposures like an absolute madman that got me).
  18. Thanks Richard I used DSS and then Startools. I'm not sure what happened, I think I screenshot it.
  19. Hi, as mentioned I'm just using the polar scope on the mount. I'm not familiar with any astrophotography software, it is all new to me. I don't intend to image away from my home location. At the moment I'm just setting a series of exposures on an intervalometer. I go back inside and when it's complete I return to bring everything back inside. It appears the most logical move for me would be to learn how to polar align through NINA as the only thing I require for that is an EQMOD cable.
  20. Ah I see, and the EQMOD cable basically just connects my mount to my laptop correct? I've heard something about a WiFi adapter too, would that do the same thing?
  21. I don't have the USB port. My camera is a Canon 800D. Sharp cap sounds great, but I was wondering if that would even be necessary as alignment can be achieved through NINA. Would I be getting the ASI 120 colour or mono, or does that even matter? What 50mm guidescope could you recommend? I think SVBONY do one that's quite cheap. Is the ZWO mini 30mm too small? I'm currently eyeballing the Astro Essentials 50mm or 32mm guidescope.
  22. Exactly what I was thinking. If I was planning to progress to guiding in the next couple of months, that would make Polemaster redundant as I could achieve perfect polar alignment through the guidescope and guidecam through NINA.
  23. Do you guys have any experience with Polemaster? Would it be a waste to buy if I was planning to upgrade to a guidescope and guidecam anyway in the future? I believe I can platesolve with a guidescope and guidecam.
  24. Looks great. So there is a way I can do this through my DSLR and OTA?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.