Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Astro Geezer

Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

9 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    South Yorkshire

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I took the plunge and bought the Zwo asi 533mc pro. Thanks for all your input, and thanks ONIKKINEN
  2. Thats a great capture and just 4.5 hours 👍
  3. That alone speaks volumes. At around my budget mark, the 533 is looking good (although the 414ex still has the best FOV I'm after)
  4. Thanks for that. I'm not tied to ZWO so would be open to other brands using the same sensor... For some reason I've been very wary of binning. Are there any implications regarding binning? I tried binning while taking exposures and although the sensitivity massively increased, I was horrified to see the images turned out mono 😃 so I'm presuming binning afterwards loses any extra sensitivity and just creates bigger pixels. I've seen the 174 sensor seems well suited (correct me if I'm wrong) but the ZWO isn't cooled, however the QHY version is. The 294 is definitely too big as I'd like to image smaller galaxies such as M109. So would the 533 be a good match for an RC6? I guess I'd at least be able to use it with my Evostar 72ed as well as a bonus? Thanks again
  5. Hi all. Sorry I'm just so confused....pixel size, FWHM, good/bad seeing, sensor size, oversampling/undersampling....my brain is now officially mush. Can anyone help me in choosing a cooled CMOS/CCD OSC camera for an Ioptron RC6 f/9 1370mm focal length? I'm on a HEQ5 mount using the Asi120mm mini to guide through a skywatcher 50ed although I've got an OAG but not used it yet, I'm not ready for mono yet. I dont want a big sensor, so I can get in closer. I was also (maybe mistakenly) led to believe that I'd need larger pixels. I don't know how much difference any of this makes... The Asi 294mc pro looked like a good fit on the Astronomy tools calculator but the chip size isn't small enough. The Atik 414ex looks a good fit on there too but is CCD technology old hat now? Any ideas gratefully received!
  6. Hi all. I'm looking to attach a Canon f/4 70-200mm EF lens to my QHY183c. Id also like a filter drawer built in if that's possible. However, I've no idea what I'm looking for! Any ideas gratefully received!
  7. Hhmmm... when I connect the mount in APT I don't get that message in EQMOD....it's all fine, yet PHD2 won't work 😡 Camera and mount are both connected but it can't complete a single exposure to loop. Works fine with Sharpcap but I need to use APT😭😭
  8. Tried PHD2 as a standalone and up pops EQMOD with this...
  9. Latest ATP and the drivers for ascom and EQMOD about 2 months
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.