Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Basementboy

Members
  • Posts

    204
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Basementboy

  1. OK great. Thanks. Looks like I need to pay for advanced Stellarium. Will try that in the first instance and take a look at Sky Safari later. I wonder if there's a good, easy to use website that lists (for eg) the brightest objects in descending order for a particular place+time?
  2. Thanks both. I elected to bring an AZ5 rather than a Go-To mount and have to deal with battery packs etc. Seems Sky Safari 7 costs £47? I can't find the magnitude or sky condition settings in Stellarium. Is that a paid feature? Cheers for your help, C.
  3. Hi – I'm travelling for two weeks to Arizona and Utah. What's the best way to identify good observing objects in a new location like this? "Turn Left at Orion" separates the sky into northern and southern hemispheres, but AZ+UT are quite a bit closer to the equator than the UK, so the book is less useful there. I have Stellarium which will show me the skies, but just lists everything – it isn't very good at identifying objects I'm actually likely to see (I'll have a 6" reflector and a pair of binoculars). Is the paid version more useful at identifying "good/easy" objects? Apologies if there's already a thread on this but I couldn't find one by searching. Thanks! Chris
  4. Oh, lots of love for the binocular suggestions too! They would certainly be what I'd take if I only had a carry-on. But I just can't miss the chance to point some decent aperture at actual desert air for once in my life. And if the plan is a bust on arrival ... well I'm sure I can buy a pair of bins at an Arizona gun shop Wish me luck!
  5. Right, so my original question was this: Having seen many SGLers' carry-on travel setups (ie, everything carefully tucked into one cabin bag), what about a travel setup that also uses a larger suitcase, checked into the cargo hold of the plane? The advice has been not to check any optics, but to carry the OTA in a cabin bag and check the tripod+mount. Seems wise. The best OTA options seem to be a C5, a small frac or a small flextube Newtonian like the Heritage 150p (removed from its Dob base). Given the long focal length of the C5, and the fact that I'm also a bit wary of how it will compare visually to the triplet refractor I'm used to; and given I don't want to invest in a sub-4" refractor (and can't afford a 4" Tak that could be dissambled into a cabin bag); I'm going to try the 150p. It's the biggest aperture (I'm desperate to finally go proper DSO hunting after years of staring at nothing in London), and it seems to collapse to somewhere between 41cm and 45cm depending what's measured (with a diametre of just under 20cm), which fits airline cabin bag dimensions. The AZ5 is in discussion because I own one, yes. I also own a carbon fibre tripod, a Manfrotto Carbon One 440. It's old so there isn't much info about it online, although I did see one site suggest it had a weight carrying capacity of 5kg (though that might refer to the photo mount, which I intend to remove in order to fit the AZ5). Weightwise, the 150p OTA and AZ5 plus diagonal+eyepiece combined probably come out to about 6-7kg so we'll see. But it's light, fits in a suitcase and has the benefit of existing at my house. The 150p is in stock at FLO so as long as I can get my AZ5 <--> tripod connection sorted out, I should be able to get everything in my hands by midweek to test before my flight. Thanks for everyone's advice! I'll report back.
  6. Oh yeah it's sturdy but I worry about its added weight on the tripod and resulting potential for vibration...
  7. You mean that the main value of your wife is her cooking? This thread is obviously well-meaning, and largely self-deprecating about telescope addiction - I have the same disease too - but I can imagine a few budding women astronomers feeling a bit uncomfortable at that particular remark. I don't know you sir and it's easy to misinterpret a comment online, so apologies if I'm getting it wrong. But maybe worth us all remembering this is a public forum and there are women here too. Besides, I'm starting to feel embarrassed at owning more shoes than both my sisters combined 😆
  8. What are you mounting the 150p on in this photo, Stu? Is that a Giro WR? And how sturdy is the tripod you're using? I've got an AZ5 and a smallish CF tripod but worried they won't be up to the task. (The AZ5 feels awfully heavy on its own.)
  9. This is so very true Is it? The 1950s called, it wants its joke back
  10. Sorry, was I not clear in the original post that I'm after a portable toothbrush?
  11. Thanks Stu - good thought. I wonder if my AZ5 is up to the job? Or it might be that the CF tripod proves more of an issue, vibration-wise Not quite there yet but I do like 4" fracs and am looking for one of the synthetic fluoride ones - next best thing?
  12. brave man! though i assume your bikes do not have any glass components this is what i'm currently looking for! I get that - it's just that I get to dark skies so rarely I really want to maximise the experience as it may not happen again for a while. Still, I take your point As for the C5, I have never used one – really have no idea. Focal length shorter than a Mak so maybe a better all-rounder? Will the sharpness be an issue now that I'm used to refractors? I suppose the only way to find out for sure is to try it
  13. It's a good idea. I just wanted more aperture ... ... But perhaps packing any OTA into a suitcase that will be battered around by airlines might not be a brilliant plan.
  14. Just chiming in to say how much I love this thread. It's so great to see such a variety – a few Takahashis sure but dozens of others, too. Interesting to hear so many people say that they'll never forget their first... and also that some of these scopes don't provide the "best" views but are still beloved. The heart wants what it wants.
  15. How are the vibrations on the 102 frac? Do you think it could go longer or does that seem like the mount's limit, in terms of length?
  16. Hello everyone, I've seen a few discussions of travel rigs with cabin bags, involving some very impressive Tetris-ing. But I'm wondering what kind of setup I could usefully take with me in my hold luggage on a plane. I'm going on a trip to Arizona in two weeks with a checked bag, and I'd love to have something more than a 3" frac along for the ride while out in the desert – and hopefully some quite dark skies. Without wanting to spend a fortune, my first thought was the flextube Heritage 150p! Nice 6" of aperture, fairly compact... but Tiny Clanger pointed out that the Dob base likely can't be disassembled, so would be very awkward even in checked luggage. Perhaps the 130p is easier? Has anyone actually tried to dissamble those tabletop Dob mounts? Or – alternative – a decent 102" frac, with some kind of lightweight mount (a little Castor? Or I have an AZ5 ...) and a carbon-fibre photography tripod that is compact enough to fit into a normal human suitcase? Of course I would pack the OTA in lots of clothes but clearly it will also get bumped around in the cargo hold. Not sure if that means buying a good ED frac for this purpose is a terrible idea. I did also consider a Mak but I'm not sure it would be a good all-rounder to use with some non-astro friends without Go-To / tracking... one of the things I'm most excited about is DSOs! (I get plenty of planetary action in London - in fact that's ALL I get.) Or perhaps I'm wrong about that too? Maybe a 4 inch Mak on an AzGTi? Too many options ... SEND HELP PLEASE Chris
  17. Hello, coming to this a bit late – and I agree it looks like a terrific mount. I also share the concerns about vibration. Has anyone tried to mount a longish (eg 102mm f/7 or 100mm f/7.4) refractor?
  18. That's incredible, he builds them himself? What a legend. Price slightly out of my range, although this Explore Scientific 12" isn't – and still seems relatively portable: https://www.rothervalleyoptics.co.uk/explore-scientific-ultra-light-12-dobsonian-telescope.html
  19. Hi Olly, thanks for this - I've always appreciated your advice, on my own questions as well those of other posters. I had the same concern about the SCT. (Also my father owns a 1980s Meade 8" that I am able to use when I visit Canada so might as well try something different.) Ditto a Mak: I can smash the planets out with the triplet at high mag, which it does well (when properly cooled and under the right conditions obv). The frac actually gets a lot of use; it's just such a beautiful object to use. What doesn't get much love any more is the Newtonian. So I think you're right that the best upgrade is Mr Dobson's. Do you have any sense of where the sweet spot is for Dobs when balancing bulk versus aperture versus cost? These are Sky-Watcher's flex-tube goto Dobs for full price at FLO: 200P – £1k 250P - £1200 300P - £1800 350P - £2400 Sorry, I know this isn't really your job And lastly ....... as for sharing with others ... I think I'll get a Goto mount, set about lowering expectations, encourage friends to focus on the social aspect with a side order of cosmos (rather than the other way round), bring a few pairs of binoculars for group fun... and make sure there's plenty of beer. C. PS. I'd love to do an astronomy holiday some time: I've never looked through a really large telescope in proper dark sky, in part because London but also because I got into astronomy during lockdown and have never been to a star party
  20. Sky-Watcher steel 3/8" – https://www.firstlightoptics.com/tripods/sky-watcher-38-stainless-steel-tripod.html
  21. Whoa. Taurus and Nadirus! Never heard of them. Love the wooden styling ... Are they well-regarded scopes? Yeah I mean I'd love these but I'm not sure they'd fit in my Fiat 500 even when collapsed. Do you know if they're easy to collapse and reassamble? Or it is a pain?
  22. Looks brilliant actually. And within my budget. Do you know if it's easy to collapse and reassamble, or is it a faff? And does it hold collimation? (I'm assuming not)
  23. This sounds cool – you're talking about EEVA here right? I must admit I didn't understand everything you've said, but I get the picture
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.