Jump to content

Narrowband

Samuel Khodari

New Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. ZWO ASI 2600 MC Pro has almost the same specs as Hypercam 26 C . While I always had problems with ZWO and QHY cameras, I never had problems with Altair Astro. I have QHY 367C that I can no longer use and it costs $4,399.00. ZWO cameras cooling would not go less than -10 most of the time. To make it short, it is better to spend $1,700 on a camera that has the same sensor of a camera that costs $3,000.00. How many of us would use fiber optics with our cameras to justify the extra cost with QHY 268 C Pro. They always used 128 mb DDR and suddenly they are using 2 gig to justify the extra mark up. QHY drivers don’t work always with all the software. Honestly, I am afraid to spend anymore money on QHY or ZWO. Both are excellent when you work but there is no telling for how long. In addition, good luck with getting your warranty service back from China in less than a few months. Just some thoughts to consider. Best of luck in your purchase. The sensor is excellent though and it matches many telescopes with its 3.76 pixel size and sensitivity as I read from reviews and examples from images taken by it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.