Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Shimonu

Members
  • Content Count

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

About Shimonu

  • Rank
    Nebula

Profile Information

  • Location
    Sweden
  1. Fantastic, thank you so much. Then I was pretty close to finishing my polar alignment when the clouds rolled in. Bit of a shame. But then it should be pretty good on the next try.
  2. But is there a crosshair or something that I should put on the star or how do I know that I'm on target after a correction?
  3. I'm trying to get started with my NEQ6 and using my linux-based laptop. I'm wondering if anyone has experience using Ekos, specifically for polar alignment? I made my first try yesterday but didn't know I needed to install the index files myself and using the online solver was quite slow. So the clouds had time to roll in. I'd like to be more prepared for next time. So I've done some experimenting with the simulator that comes with and feel quite comfortable with everything but the PA as that seems to be correct from the start in the simulator. So does anyone have experience with it? From what I saw yesterday it seems to do an initial evaluation if you just hit start and gives you a vector to correct. But I never really had time to try correcting. Can it do a live loop and show the progress or do you start over with the procedure?
  4. At f/5.9 the WO Z61 is a fair bit slower than your lenses. So I think it's quite natural that the stars are dimmer when viewed through the Z61.
  5. Unfortunately this mount seems to old to support that. Had another look at the utilities menu and it's not supported.
  6. Have you ever managed to polar align using the scope? I've heard you can polar align with your telescope and SharpCap but I haven't got a properly working camera yet so the polar scope is all I have right now. I'm waiting on a guy that buys cameras and has them astro-modded to sell. When I hear he's got a camera I'll certainly try SharpCap.
  7. Well maybe it's not as bad as I thought and I'm wondering why nobody has told me it seems perfectly normal and I'm just a dummy. I had a quick google and of course AstroBackyard comes up and I see this picture: This is pretty much what I see too, just that I couldn't really distinguish any stars. But as I said I'm in my pretty well lit backyard and I still had some twilight when I was looking. So maybe I just need better conditions?
  8. I'll have another look but I don't think that option is available. Because I believe I found it but when I enter that utility it says it's not available for my mount. Because this is a pretty old second hand mount. I read another thread where someone had accessed the board and measured the voltage for the LED and I might do the same to see if it's incorrect. I'm assuming it should really just illuminate the reticule to help me position polaris. I guess i should also double check the focus on the scope as I've only tested it terrestrially to do collimation.
  9. So I got a battery for my mount(Skywatcher NEQ6) and tonight was clear so I thought I would have a first go at setting it up and trying to polar align in my backyard. After setting it up roughly north, altitude roughly matching where I am, having the CW bar out and dec axis rotated 90 degrees I had a look through the polar scope with the mount turned on. Is the whole view supposed to be illuminated red? It felt like the scope was just saturated with the red light rather than showing the sky. I've just never heard anyone describe that and it got me confused. As I was in my backyard I'm in about a bortle 6-ish zone so I'm not sure if Polaris should be visible in the scope but I could faintly see it with my naked eye. But the way the scope looked I wasn't sure I would be able to see anything. I ended up doing a pretty rough polar alignment using just the telescope. Now I'm at 58 degrees latitude so trying to get under that scope for a view was not terribly pleasant. I'm pretty sure I'll be getting a camera for polar alignment anyway, but it would be nice to know if this sounds normal and I can still give it a go until I have the camera.
  10. So I'm just getting into AP and looking at what camera I should get. I'm considering whether I should go for a dedicated camera from the get-go and what that would mean. Astroberry seems interesting because I have several raspberry pi at home for other projects and I could pretty easily set one up with Astroberry. I still haven't quite understood how it's used once you're in the field though. If possible I'd like to avoid carrying a laptop with me as that's the point with something like this in my mind. But are you able to control it with your phone or is a tablet required? I've seen reviews of the ASIAir and it seems to have a pretty good mobile application interface but I haven't seen anything like this for Astroberry. So I guess I'm asking how Astroberry is controlled and what is actually required besides the RPi? I won't have a backyard to image from so no home network connection. Thanks!
  11. I'll check. That would be great! This got me thinking about if I should go for the bigger scope instead. The choices never stops!
  12. So I have my SW NEQ-6 Pro mount and I'm planning on buying a WO Zenithstar 61 and using a Canon 600D. I was testing the mount a little and put on my visual scope, the SW Skymax 102 together with my old Nikon D60. With these set up and a single 5 kg counterweight all the way at the top then it seems to just be balanced, perhaps a nudge heavy on the counterweight side. I figure the Nikon and Canon cameras aren't going to differ more than maybe 100 g or so, but pretty negligible and the Zenithstar is about 0.5 kg lighter than the Skymax. This is going to give me trouble when it comes to balance. The Zenithstar is also just 61 mm which puts the weight even closer to the center. I checked FLO for counterweights but there doesn't seem to be any lighter than 5 kg for the NEQ-6. Does this mean I'll have to figure out some custom solution or what are my options? Is this the excuse for getting a bigger scope? It annoyed me that the 61 doesn't come in blue but the 73 does..
  13. Yeah I think that's it. I loosened the screw for the accessory tray and made sure it was first really screwed in to the wedge. There wasn't much movement but I could tighten it a little more and then I properly tightened the accessory tray and made sure the azimuth bolts were tight too and it seems pretty good. I'm sure I could still move it if I really tried but just rotating the RA didn't seem to have any effect now. I think the problem before was also that I was sitting by the polar scope and using the counterweight bar to rotate the RA. Thanks. That should really allow me to do the collimation now.
  14. I'm just getting started in AP and I'm collimating my polar scope on my NEQ6 for the first time. So I'm trying to collimate my polar scope and at first I got a little scared because after I did the first adjustment and rotated the RA 180 degrees the polar scope was way off all of a sudden. After I recentered and looked through the polar scope while doing another rotation I realized that the wedge moves a little in azimuth. Like it has a play, even if I lock down the azimuth screws I can still move it. I tried to make sure the long bolt underneath which holds the accessory tray and everything was also screwed in tight. But it still moves. This feels very strange to me as it makes the polar alignment very iffy. While handling the mount you could easily nudge it and go out of polar alignment, even though you haven't actually touched the screws or moved the tripod legs. Any thoughts?
  15. Yeah, you don't want the ones that don't see space. I tried one, terrible experience..
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.