Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Noobulosity

Members
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

32 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    Astrophotography, beer, board games, video games, tabletop RPGs, aquariums, golf, hiking, landscape/nature photography, vintage razors, fountain pens, woodworking, growing hot peppers, target sports, coffee, and probably a few others...
  • Location
    Loveland, CO

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Sure. Pretty much all color cameras have a Bayer matrix. You could practice on cheaper, old cameras.
  2. Totally forgot to post an update here. I finally had an opportunity to test my 7D mono mod, after months of nothing but clouds around here (and a few clear nights where I had no opportunities to image... but mostly clouds). I didn't get very far before more clouds moved in, but I managed to get some shots in on IC5070 Pelican Nebula with 600s exposure times. I shot H-alpha only, using a Baader 7nm H-a filter, 600s, a mix of ISO400 (2 frames), ISO800 (6 frames), and ISO1600 (3 frames). Last time I had a working sensor, someone suggested longer times were best with narrowband filters. So, that's what I tested. No calibration frames or dithering here, I just didn't have time. And... I was just plain lazy and didn't feel like it. This was just a test anyway, not a serious imaging session. In any case, this is what I ended up with. Still pretty noisy, which I'm sure would improve with additional exposures and calibration frames to smooth things out. Taken with my WO Zenithstar 103. This one is just the straight stack, no editing at all: With a little work done to it:
  3. These lighters have more of a jet flame than a lazy candle flame. Like a small propane torch. It's just a style, not a brand.
  4. If you plate-solve and sync your mount, you can also use the Sky Atlas to find and slew to targets. Often if you slew close to your target and plate-solve, choosing to slew again will get you right on the spot you wanted. It can also import coordinates from planetarium softwares using the little map pin / GPS marker icon thing in the framing wizard.
  5. Well....... I guess I just couldn't leave well enough alone. I picked up another sensor from eBay (my 4th one...) and went at it again. This time, I'm really pleased with the results. My method: After dismantling the sensor a bit, I was able to remove the cover glass relatively easily using a torch-style lighter to break the epoxy and a hobby knife to very gently lift the glass. (Add a touch of heat to help it release if it doesn't want to lift.) Once the cover glass is removed, I reapply the plastic frame that held the UV filter (I removed it). This acts as a guide for my scraper and helps me avoid hitting the tiny gold wires. Use a sharpened oak dowel to begin the removal process. Once I start seeing decent wear, I added some Maas Metal Polish to the tip of the dowel. This helps to wear through the Bayer matrix to the bare photosites. DON'T OVERDO THIS!! Once I start opening up areas through the filter layer, I switched to a cotton swab/Q-tip with more of the Maas Metal Polish. Gently rubbing and swirling to help erode and remove the epoxy Bayer matrix. This worked REALLY well! I was able to get a nice, uniform removal over the majority of the sensor, only leaving behind the border areas to avoid hitting sensitive electronics. As-needed during the process, and to check progress, I used 91% isopropyl alcohol to clean off the metal polish, then a dry swab to clean up most of the alcohol and swarf. Once I reassembled the camera, it worked like a charm! It takes nice, clear, sharp images. I can't wait to test it using my telescope. Since it's a really bright moon right now, I may test out some H-alpha narrowband imaging and see what I get. Flat: Converted flat: Converted daytime image: Highly-stretched to inspect for defects:
  6. Unfortunately, disassembly/reassembly didn't fix the issue. I still have the regular intervals of vertical dead pixel lines. I wonder if I touched something adding the copper cold finger and messed something up on the sensor. It's tough to see what's actually between the sensor and its PCB, so I wouldn't be surprised if I scratched something with the copper plate as I slipped it between the two. I recall there being a burr on the copper plate when I tried putting it in initially. I did sand that off and it went in fine. But, maybe I scratched through something in that process. As much as I really, REALLY want to keep at this, I think my attempts at this project are done. It was fun and rewarding. I just can't keep sinking money into it, at this point. Any idea if dithering might help to minimize the impact of these dead lines? Or is that just an exercise in futility? Anyone want to buy my Canon 7D and pick up the project? Shoot me a PM.
  7. I'll try some more daytime shots to see what I get. It wasn't doing this before, and I tried to stay away from the sensor surface when I added the cooler. I can also try reseating the ribbon cables.
  8. I have to agree. This has been educational and quite enjoyable. I know it'll never be a "real" astro camera. But, I've learned a lot in the process.
  9. Ended up testing a bit more, and this interpretation seems to be a bit more blended. Feels like fuzzier details, though. I didn't get this with daytime photos, so this just feels very confusing. dcraw64 -r 1 1 1 1 -d -4 -T -b 16 *.cr2 (FYI, I did stretch the image a touch, which is why it appears brighter.)
  10. I added a larger TEC (50W, this time) and heatsink. It dropped the EXIF temperature very quickly, and condensation began forming within a few minutes of having it turned on. I needed to use a desktop PC power supply to get this one started, as the laptop PSU had some type of short-circuit protection preventing it from running. I noticed something interesting while I was messing around with my camera again. I went back and looked at a photo with light leaks, and saw vertical lines. But, it's not "banding noise", per se... it almost looks like it's showing the gap between pixels, now that I'm using DCRAW to ignore the Bayer interpretation for RGB. I think that's what I'm seeing as vertical banding in my images. I hope that dithering will reduce that significantly. Any other ideas as to how to eliminate this? Can I "re-debayer" the image as mono, but in a way that's more like when it's interpreted as RGB to get rid of those pixel columns?
  11. The version that doesn't work. Is that one of the nightly releases? If so, why not go back to the working version? Nightly releases aren't made to be stable, they're for testing new features. If something broke, let the devs know about it so they can fix it.
  12. Aside from the exposed areas touching the sensor itself and the TEC side outside the camera, it's been sprayed with a rubber material. I'm sure it's not perfectly sealed off, but it should be pretty well sealed inside the camera. I plan to get some liquid electrical tape to touch some areas up. Are you referring to electrically insulated, or thermally insulated? Or both?
  13. Also... Has anyone else noticed significantly-increased banding noise after removing the Bayer matrix? I'm seeing a lot of banding noise in stretched dark frames. And I noticed a lot of it came out when I took an image of the Eastern Veil nebula in H-alpha. Now... I don't think I dithered in that image at all, so that will likely help. But, can dithering even out ALL of that banding? I'm not entirely sure. The stretched dark frame below was done in Photoshop by just doing a Levels adjustment and dropping the white point down to 3. (Yep... 3.) Unprocessed stack from DSS in H-alpha: Slightly-cooled, highly-stretched 120s dark frame, EXIF temp 27°C (but, probably a few degrees cooler than that):
  14. Any ideas out there on plugging up light leaks through that left side of the camera, where I have my cold finger protruding? It's coming out right by the data ports (HDMI, USB, etc.), and I have a feeling there's some light making it through the actual ports themselves. I currently have the area covered with electrical tape, which does the job. But, I'm looking for something that won't peel up. The tape seems to have a tough time sticking onto the rubber grip and port cover areas. Should I plug these ports somehow? Fill them with liquid electrical tape? I was shining a high-powered flashlight around those areas (probably 500 lumens or more, as it's a 1k lumen flashlight at about 3/4 power). This really helped me find all of my light leaks. Most of them were around the seam around the back panel of the camera where it attaches to the rest of the body. I did notice some light made it in through the top small LCD screen that displays the current settings, too. Some black electrical tape slapped over them helped plug up the light leaks pretty well. I'm just looking for something that's less... "Red/Green"-looking. I'm leaning toward the liquid electrical tape, but always up for suggestions.
  15. That's probably too deep. It looks like you scraped through the protective undercoating. But, you can pop the sensor back in and test it to see if it still functions. Broken glass gets into pretty sticky territory. It doesn't take much to scratch the sensor too deeply and hit a photosite or surrounding circuitry. And broken glass is really sharp. It can easily scratch through the polymer coatings. I'll be surprised if that sensor still works, but it's worth trying it to see what happens.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.