>>>The Celestron Firmware guru on the TeamCelestron forum (Celestron beta test) has this to say:
Everything dies eventually. <<<
What a flippant response!
First off, a telescope that originally cost several thousand dollars, and has been well-taken care of, is not an appliance. And even if you think of it that way, the oven that we installed when we built our home 20 years ago is still there--and still used daily. <knocks on wood> Frankly, I'd be ticked off if a $1000 appliance bit the dust after just six years.
I own a CPC1100 that I just acquired a couple of months ago. It was kept in near-perfect condition by the original owner, and I've had the opportunity to use it about four times now. The first three times it tracked beautifully, especially after setting it up with a 3-star alignment. This past Saturday however, the tracking seemed to be lousy...and I initially thought it was due to the fact that I set it up with a "solar system" alignment on the moon, since I aligned it prior to sunset. Because of the bad tracking, I tried after sunset four times to do a proper 3-star alignment. After four failed attempts, that's when I started scrolling through the hand-controller menus and discovered the out-of-whack date.
Later on that evening, a friend who was with me decided to try looking online to see if he could gain any insight into what was going on, and that's when we found out about the GPS bug.
Celestron needs to step up here and be a good "corporate citizen."
A response like the one posted above, even if it's not official, makes them look HORRIBLE. ("Well sure you spent six grand with us, but that was six or seven years ago, so you shouldn't expect anything more than a paperweight at this point")
I'm not even suggesting that they go out-of-pocket and absorb the entire cost of a fix.
I've seen where they've suggested that affected users can buy a new hand-controller, or a new plug-in GPS unit to fix the issue.
That's all well and good, but if they were smart, they would offer all affected parties their choice at, say, "Cost plus 10%."
If they did that, not only would they not be eating *any* costs from this debacle, they would also avoid the inevitable bad PR they'd start to accumulate if Derek the Firmware Engineer sent out any more flippant e-mails.
Just an idea.