Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Mark1489

Members
  • Posts

    63
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

226 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Location
    Pontarddulais, Wales, UK

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Jupiter, 20th September from Pontarddulais, South Wales (51.7 degrees latitude). Celestron C8, ZWO ADC, 2x Barlow, Altair 224c Best 12% of 20k frames stacked
  2. Hi everyone, haven’t posted here in a while as I’ve had a small break from astrophotography but Jupiter has got my motivation back! The ease of setting up and imaging quite quickly in comparison to deep sky definitely helps. Very much liking the view of the small storms and interesting atmospheric colours that I couldn’t get with my old 5inch Maksutov. Celestron C8, ZWO ADC, 2x Barlow, Altair 224c (about 4000mm fl) Best 12% of 20,000 frames Hope you enjoy the view!
  3. Thanks,I tried to balance the sharpening with the increased noise, seems to be one of the main aspects of processing these! I may have gone a bit overboard with the frames, I wasn’t really too sure at the time if the seeing was that good, so went for it just in case! 😂
  4. I’ve been patiently waiting for Saturn to move into a spot where I can image it from my garden…early hours this morning with some good seeing conditions was the time! First light with the C8 too, looking forward to getting Jupiter next! 🙂 Constructive criticism welcome, I’m new to planetary imaging so looking forward to learning more! Celestron C8, zwo ADC, 2x Barlow, Altair 224c, best 40% of 21,000 frames
  5. Thanks Neil! Hopefully many more nights to come with the seeing as good as the night I captured Saturn! Mark
  6. Hi Mark 🙂 I used a Altair GPCAM3 224c with a 2x Barlow and ZWO ADC, I think it was around 10ms per frame, 13,000 frames for Saturn and about 10,000 for Jupiter, with the best 15% stacked for both I've got it all mounted on a Ioptron GEM28 Still learning a lot about it all, wasn't entirely sure if I could have made longer imaging runs without details smearing but I shall be experimenting in future! Mark
  7. Hi all, after having acquired a Skywatcher Mak 127 at the end of last year, this summer I decided to try planetary imaging and I have to say, I really enjoyed it, even more so than deep sky! I found the processing less stressful and more enjoyable, along with a greater compatibility with the Welsh weather since we don’t get clear skies often or for long timescales per night. Anyway, here’s my take on Saturn and Jupiter, both near opposition taken under good seeing conditions. Starting to feel a case of aperture fever may be coming on….. Mark
  8. Thanks Olly! There's quite a bit of local light pollution here so sometimes it's a challenge getting that flat neutral background! Very kind words, I try not to push it too hard! 😀 Thanks Thanks! Part of me wishes I had more reach but I like having some surrounding area on show too. Just pixinsight for DBE and Histogram transformation, the rest in PS. I actually imaged a grey card in sunlight (I know most people don't bother and balance manually) since it's a modified camera but I just find it gives me something close to a good balance to start with, then just a few tweaks to the balance if its needed 🙂
  9. Thanks Vlaiv! You're right they do look a little bloated...I've been experimenting using different methods of focusing. Tried the bahtinov mask that came with the scope but I found it tricky and I'd end up with elongated stars in some corners after focus, I believe on this image I used the lowest HFD value I could get on Backyard Nikon so it could very well be missed focus! I appreciate the critique and kind words! 🙂 Edit - I just remembered there was a fair amount of high cloud drifting in and out...could that contribute to bloated stars? Mark
  10. I've always used my trusty Samyang 135mm for deep sky imaging in the past, but I've always wanted a little more reach and resolution! By no means is this a close up of Andromeda but I'm halving my previous pixel scale by now using the Redcat 51. Had an issue with overcorrecting flats...a few nasty dust motes were appearing brighter in the calibrated image but I think I've manged to contain them. Upon checking my sensor (for the first time) I saw the dust and managed to blow it off with an air blower - thankfully didn't have to go down the "wet" cleaning route....yet!!! So here it is, first deep sky image through a telescope and not a lens! Info: 69 x 90 seconds about 1hr 45 total integration 30 flats D5600a, Redcat 51, ISO 400 Autoguided, GEM28 Bortle 4 - 5
  11. Glad it’s there in one piece! Looking forward to the images you take using the camera! Mark
  12. Hi, As mentioned above I think the AZ-GTi may be a better option, another may be the Fornax light track II as that mount has a very low level of periodic error but framing may be more difficult. A lot of people go with the Heq5 pro it seems, that’s leaving trackers behind though and moving onto full eq mount territory. Autoguiding would give you better results definitely on both the star adventurer or Az-GTi, I’d probably go with the latter as you can guide in both axis and have go-to capabilities. Mark
  13. Hi I think you may be pushing the star adventurer to the limit/beyond with that scope - how much will depend on your pixel scale so dependant on the pixel size of your dslr. It will also depend on your tolerance for round stars; you might get short exposures which look fine but no doubt you’ll want longer exposures in time and you may end up frustrated! Another thing to take account is the periodic error of each particular star adventurer - they seem to vary. It’s a good star tracker for shorter focal lengths though! Mark
  14. Hi everyone, Does anyone have any experience running the Altair HyperCam 183c pro tec with the samyang? I’m looking to get this camera for a lower pixel scale. Obviously cooling another added benefit! Apologies if I’ve missed any posts on this thread who has this setup! Mark
  15. Thank you! I can relate with those clear skies and full moons! Keep at it and get as many photons as you can, you’ll get the image you want if you just go flat out with the total integration time I’m sure!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.