Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.



New Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

79 Excellent

About Hungrymark

  • Rank
  1. Hungrymark

    Help me with observing nebulas

    I have nothing to add about the astronomy but can I just say there's absolutely no need to apologise for your English language skills, which are excellent. Especially given that you are writing about a technical subject. All the best.
  2. Hungrymark

    Hoovering up the vacuum cleaner 21.3.18

    Haha, you were right, almost exactly the same as my night! M81/82 do look stunning that high up don't they?
  3. Hungrymark

    Galaxies and globs

    Absolutely! Glad I wasn't the only one to get a good view of the M81 group. I think I caught some hints of arms, possibly dust lanes.
  4. Hungrymark

    Galaxies and globs

    Yes, I'm noticing that! 3077 was averted vision, but I left it at one point and came back half an hour later and it was still there next to the right stars so I'm claiming it!
  5. Hungrymark

    Galaxies and globs

    Skywatcher 200p dob. My first scope but I think it's going to last me a while! I really want to get out of my back garden to somewhere properly dark though. On the edge of town so some light pollution, not too bad though.
  6. Hungrymark

    Galaxies and globs

    Nothing mega-exciting but having been after M109 for a while, I got it tonight. UMa was pretty high so it was just a question of getting Phecda out of the fov. Also, M108 and M97 again, the latter through a UHC filter, which I think allowed a hint of the eyes but wouldn't bet on it. I've heard M108 is one of the harder Messiers to see but I don't seem to ever have much of a problem with it. M101 remains my nemesis. Can't nail it down! M81 and M82 were stunning though. Best I've seen them in my short career so far. Hints of spiral structure in M81 and definite shadow areas in M82. Also NGC 3077 nearby. Great stuff. Revisited the Leo Messiers as well, just for practise, and tried to split Izar but the seeing was atrocious (despite the transparency being pretty good) so no chance. Nice views of M13, M92 and M53 as well, as I was in the area, which I hadn't seen before (only started in December and obviously they're only just coming into view). A bit low so not much resolution (as I say, seeing was awful) but looking forward to going back when they're a little higher. All in all, a nice little session but now my knees are strangely cold.
  7. I'm relatively new too, like yourself. I don't know if you've already worked this out but what's made a staggering difference to my ability to find stuff is working out the field of view of my finder and using that to compare to star charts. Sounds so simple, but it didn't occur to me for months, felt like a right idiot. Anyway, try that and M81/82 become simple to jump to straight from Dubhe.
  8. Hungrymark

    The curse is lifted

    I found it with 37x, went up to 60x then 120x. None were satisfactory compared to sketches I've seen but, as I say, it was pretty low down this far north and that early in the evening, so I'm not disheartened, just wondering. Thanks for the reply.
  9. Hungrymark

    New General Catalog Object Analysis

    It makes sense, when I think about it. Daft really. Of all the universe that is visible from here, of course the most visible objects are those massive things with billions if stars in them, but even so, blimey...
  10. Hungrymark

    New General Catalog Object Analysis

    That's interesting, thanks. I bought Bratton's Herschel Objects book and was similarly staggered by quite how many of them are galaxies.
  11. Hungrymark

    The curse is lifted

    How high was M3 in the sky and, if you don't mind, what time /location? I had a peek last night (8" dob) but it was quite low (it was about 8.30pm in Cumbria) and I could only really resolve individual stars in the cluster with averted vision. I was wondering if it was the position of the cluster or some collimation issue, although I did check the scope and it seemed OK. Defocused stars were the 'correct' shape and I found E in the trapezium at 200x along with a split of iota cassiopeia, but you know when you have doubts... Basically, I'm fairly new to this sort of thing and am not really sure what to expect to see with globs.
  12. Hungrymark

    Does it *ever* get relaxing?

    I'm a beginner too but I find I just lose myself through the eyepiece. Nothing else matters. I do what somebody else suggested and look for something easy but cool first, like M42, the harder stuff once I've got my eye in, and then plan a finish on something I can find easily with tired eyes but of which there's always some new aspect, like the double cluster.
  13. Hungrymark

    Newting for Doubles

    I couldn't split Izar the other night with a barlowed 10mm EP through a 1200mm focal length scope (240x), but it was very low down. I could see the two of them but couldn't separate.
  14. Hungrymark

    Favourite Class Of Object, And Reasons

    I've only been doing this for a couple of months but got into it because I wanted to see galaxies, and they haven't let me down. I'm working my way through the Messiers and whenever I find a new one it gives me a shiver, even if on a purely visual level you can't actually see much compared to closer objects! Mind you, it being winter, haven't seen a globular yet (properly - I did find M3 last night but, for boring reasons I won't go into, the mirror had condensation on it so it was just a blob).
  15. Hungrymark

    NGC3941 New Supernova in Ursa Major SN2018pv

    What kind of aperture on a dob would you expect to be able to see this, from a sort of Bortle 4 sky?

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.