Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_open_clusters_winners.thumb.jpg.6f22fafea012ea83480eb785879332c2.jpg

Snooze

New Members
  • Content count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

20 Excellent

About Snooze

  • Rank
    Nebula

Profile Information

  • Location
    France
  1. Snooze

    Jupiter as a noob

    Very nice first attempt. Keep at it and you will soon be amazed by the results you'll get! And by the way I have the Skymax102!
  2. Jupiter imaged on the 9th of July with my Skymax 102 + ASI120MC! Seeing was good and using 1.5x drizzle in autostakkert made a nice difference!
  3. Jupiter and 3 moons(Europa, Ganymede and Io) imaged on the 6th of July with a Skymax102 and ASI120MC . It was my first try at imaging Jupiter using the Skymax and the ASI120
  4. Snooze

    The EQ3 DSO Challenge

    Is saving time the only benefit of the pro version or is the tracking smoother and better too? I have my eyes set on the eqm-35 but there are not many(if any) reviews of it at the moment. But to be honest I'd rather save +200€ and get the eq3 pro(or non pro) and use a small APO to image if I can . There are images in this thread that are way better than those taken on more expensive mounts.
  5. Snooze

    The EQ3 DSO Challenge

    Very nice images! I just learned that you can auto-guide with the dual axis motors. So for those of you who use the dual axis motors, how well do they perform? Is the EQ3 Pro goto worth the +130€?
  6. Snooze

    HEQ5 Polar Alignment Help (Newbie)

    Hi, I was looking for some info about the EQM-35 and found one of your topics where you said you bought one. I can see in your recent topics that you use an HEQ5. So what happened to the EQM-35 mount?
  7. Snooze

    Imaging with a Star Adventurer

    Here are my attempts with the Mini version of the SA. M42 - 43x 60s subs ISO800 @300mm f/8 M31 - 43 x 60 subs ISO800 @190mm f/5.6 Both images taken in light polluted skies (Bortle 7) with a canon 1200D + Sigma 70-300mm non APO
  8. Bigger apertures make a difference in visual but in astro aperture is indeed irrelevant. And yes a 66mm apo f5 will be better than a 127 SCT f10 for DSOs.
  9. The focal ratio is what is important. The faster the scope the shorter the exposure times for DSOs. Astrophotographers usually aim for F/5 or faster scopes. Your C5 SCT is F/10 which means you will have to take longer exposures than say a 66mm APO at F/5. Plus the long focal length of the C5 will have a greater impact on tracking. However you can buy a focal reducer to make the scope "faster". As for the mount, people generally advise to get the best you can afford and in this case the EQ5 is the winner. A 66mm+DSLR could do fine on your EQ3 + you can still use it to image if you decide to upgrade your mount in the future but I can't say if it is going to be worth it. If you go for the EQ5 you will need a focal reducer for your SCT. Now I'm sure someone with more experience will provide more information. Cheers
  10. Snooze

    Star Adventurer or the Mini Version?

    I have the mini version but haven't been able to fully test it out in the field. Attached is M42 imaged at 300mm ISO800 from a red zone. About 20-25% of the 60s subs were usable shooting from a window and I think draughts and convection currents are the reason I'm getting 75% subs with star trails. So it should perform way better outside.
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.