Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Eruliaf

Members
  • Posts

    47
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

40 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Colchester

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. It is as painful as it sounds. You have to visually line up each image and then use masks to feather the joins. I am still very much a beginner on this - There are some tutorials on youtube which I followed (several times!) to get the end result. On the full size image, there are some visible lines, but I hope as my skills improve I can prevent this in the future.
  2. My first attempts at Jupiter on the 130 - also on the getting started with imaging/130PDS topic as well, but more suited to this location. 3 x Barlow and ZWO 462MC - 3 min AVI file processed with AS3. Also, my first ever mosaic (7 panel moon) - slightly clipped (lower right) where I did not overlap them, processed AS3 and stitched (with much room for improvement) in Gimp.
  3. I believe that the Microsoft ICE is no longer supported and therefore not available for download via the Microsoft website - I was looking for this at the weekend. Ended up using Gimp to stitch the images together which works really well, although is a little more labour intensive.
  4. Appreciate that the 130 isn't the weapon of choice for planetary, however balanced against the thought of deconstructing my rig to put the 200 on, I thought I would give it a go. I have not seen many planetary images on this thread, so thought I would put one up to see what others have achieved with Jupiter so high at the moment.
  5. Good afternoon all, Reaching out to the technical collective of the forum for advice. As per the title, I am looking for a planetary camera for my setup to allow for better images. I have an ASIAir so would like this to be a ZWO unit so that it is compatible as I am getting on the ASIAir very well. A few of my questions: I am assuming colour as I don't have a mono setup and wouldn't look to be going this far for now? Are all the planetary cameras 1.25 inch and not 2 inch? Do I need my comma corrector, or is this not required for planetary? What is the max barlow that I could use (currently have 2x and 3x)? What should I be looking for in a camera (specs)? For use on a Skywatcher 130 PDS with ASIAir There will probably be more questions posed by my request, but any input is gratefully received rather than just take a punt at a purchase and end up with the wrong camera. Thanks in advance
  6. @jjosefsen How did you stop the light getting in around the focusser and still be able to focus? To the wider community - It has also been mentioned that light may be getting in at the bottom of my scope - Can anyone advise how this has been effectively prevented? Thanks
  7. Re-shot my darks with the camera out of the scope - much better result, however it did make me realise that if the darks when in the scope are impacted by stray light, the lights will be as well. I have evidenced this by inputting the new darks into my images and whilst better, I still have a gradient across them. So, my next move will be to take dark shots with the camera in the scope whilst inside with the lights on to try and identify where the light is getting in. Will report back once I get an opportunity to do this.
  8. Thank you - that all appears to make sense. I will look into this when I am imaging next.
  9. I am using my ZWO ASI071MC Colour with the Skywatcher 130PDS. I have a skywatcher comma corrector attached to the camera, otherwise just the scope. The darks were taken outside (at night) with no specific lights pointing in the direction of the scope, with the scope cap on (i.e. I don't think its light getting into the scope) I have the temp of the camera set at -10 Deg C and it was holding this well all night.
  10. Good afternoon all. I have been struggling recently with gradients across my images - which I just put down to moonlight. I managed to get some time imaging last night, and noted that my darks are coming out very strange (see image below). Any pointers on where this issue is likely to be stemming from - light getting into the scope, camera issues, user error? Or, is this normal and I have still got lots more to learn! Thanks in advance!
  11. First proper attempt at imaging for (too) many months due to house move, short nights, too much work and of course, clouds. However I am very happy with the progress from my first DSLR images (refer to embarrassingly over manipulated avatar image) to this, the first with my ZWO cam and ASIAir set up. The ASIAir really is a wonderful box of tricks which makes taking quality images so much easier. Even an idiot like me can do it! Being stubborn, I didn't want to wait for the moon to drop, so had to remove quite a gradient from this image as well, but it did help being such a small target allowing me to crop a lot out. Exhibit A - The Cocoon nebula ZWO ASI 071 MC colour camera with 7 hours 15 mins of 5 min subs - 20 flats, 5 darks and 20 bias. Stacked with deepskystacker and processed in Gimp. Only removed a single sub, where the ISS photobombed with a very bright white streak across the middle of the field.
  12. Good evening, For the first of my two stupid questions tonight - I already know the correct answer (which is buy a dedicated planetary camera), but I can't help think that I must be able to get a better image of Jupiter than the pixelated dot that I currently achieve with my ZWO071MC colour camera. I have been taking a video file, approx. 1 minute passing through Autostakkert and saving the resulting image. The issue I have is that irrespective of the resolution (lower resolution provides a larger image, but obviously of a lower quality) the stacked image is appalling - example below. When previously doing this via my DSLR, I am sure Autostakkert took significantly longer to process than the 15 seconds it has been taking for my latest 1+Gb files! So, starting with the basics - what are the first school boy errors that typically trip people up, or is the answer simply that the camera is not designed for this and a pixelated dot is the best that can be achieved with a dedicated deep sky camera. As always, thank you in advance for any response/guidance issued!
  13. Slow response, but very cloudy.... Added the other adapter as advised above and it has worked perfectly. Deepskystacker scores now off the charts! @fozzybear Thank you for your advice.
  14. Good evening all, I have recently purchased a ZWO ASI 071MC-Pro camera as an upgrade from my DSLR. Having used a coma corrector previously (Skywatcher one I believe), I transferred this to the new setup. Having taken a few shots last night, I can see major coma around the edges (penetrating up to approximately one third of the depth of the image) of the images, much alike when I used to shoot with the DSLR with no coma corrector. The corrector is attached directly to the camera via the supplied adapter (approx. 10mm). My questions are: Is this typical? Do I need an alternative corrector? Do I need an alternative spacer? Is there anything that I could have setup wrong to produce the coma? Thanks in advance! Scope is Skywatcher PDS130 with standard focuser.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.