Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_2.thumb.jpg.72789c04780d7659f5b63ea05534a956.jpg

Jonathan Rees

Members
  • Content Count

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

40 Excellent

1 Follower

About Jonathan Rees

  • Rank
    Nebula

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Illinois

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I have the 1300D. I love it! I took action photos over the weekend at my son's (American) football game. It was the first time I used the camera for anything like that and with very few exception, the pictures turned out great. For normal and astrophotography, it seems you can't go wrong with any EOS.
  2. The thing that sold me on the DSLR was that with the telescope camera I had from Celestron (solar system imager), I couldn't get the full sun or moon in the picture frame. You can probably find a used DSLR Canon Rebel 3 for $250 (U.S. $) and add another $50-60 for the telescope adapters, focal reducer, and extension tube. It is a pricey investment, but it is worth it.
  3. I used the stock camera app. I have since purchased a phone rig that attached to the eyepiece. It still requires a little patience, but works pretty good. I have also recently purchased a DSLR. I doubt I take many more astro-pics with my iPhone...except for fun. I would like to retry the Jupiter pic and dump it into Registax to see what happens.
  4. I totally agree! For the record, I did lower the brightness, but because I was holding an iPhone up to the lens, the brightness level kept resetting. If you haven't tried, it isn't easy to take a photo that way. Still, not a bad first try.
  5. Very cool! I'm always impressed with iPhone pics. I posted one of Jupiter i took with a 7 plus (just posted it tonight. check out the top of the thread). in retrospect, I wish I had lowered the brightness a bit.
  6. Very cool. I recently acquired Registax, but I haven't had an opportunity to try it out.
  7. iPhone picture taken April 15th from central Illinois, USA. Not bad, all things considered. A few days later, I acquired a Celestron Solar Sustem Imager camera.
  8. Sorry for the huge quote, but I LOVE these last two pics. I'm just starting out, but I'd love to eventually be able to take pics like these. Very cool!
  9. Celestron came out with the EclipSmart Refracting Telescope. It's a $100, 50 mm scope that's made purely for solar observing. Here's the Amazon link (more so you can see it than for helping you buy one). Sure, you can buy a solar shield for less, but this is an all in one unit. By the way, the tripod it comes with is junk, but it gets the job done. https://www.amazon.com/Celestron-EclipSmart-Certified-Refracting-22060/dp/B000051TN6/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1501969944&sr=1-1&keywords=Celestron+EclipSmart+ISO+Certified%2C+2017+North+American+Total+Solar+Eclipse+Refra
  10. I may have answered my own question based on Bright Giant's equation. The short answer is (I believe): it wouldn't hurt, but it might be close.
  11. Thanks, everyone! One last question. I bought a Canon Rebel T6 DSLR. I have also purchased the required telescope mount. Will I still need a focal reducer? The Rebel's sensor size seems to be 22.3 x 14.9 mm.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.