Jump to content

stargazine_ep39_banner.thumb.jpg.b87bddaa2aded94d2a3456c0589a82b9.jpg

bob1957

Members
  • Content Count

    157
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

54 Excellent

About bob1957

  • Rank
    Star Forming

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    Stellar spectography and solar observation
  • Location
    Holmfirth, West Yorkshire, UK

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Maxwell was very much a man who was ahead of his time. The scientific community during his life had great difficulty understanding what his electromagnetic theory of light really meant. It is probably this and the fact that he died at a very early age meant that his genius has been so overlooked. Compared with Einstein the public generally has no idea who Maxwell was, but Einstein himself often paid tribute to Maxwell and also had a photograph of Maxwell on his study wall. For a first rate book on Maxwell's life, science and legacy read Basil Mahon's "The Man Who Changed Everything". Cheers, B
  2. bob1957

    SGL XI Chit Chat

    Cheers John. All I've got to do know is buy a caravan which is the planned for end of January.
  3. bob1957

    SGL XI Chit Chat

    Cheers guys. Looking forward to my first SGL star party and meeting you all. Bob
  4. bob1957

    SGL XI Chit Chat

    Is there an update of the pitch plan available as I've booked but it's not yet showing. Cheers, Bob
  5. Got it. So re-reading the NASA press release the water is flowing just below the surface trapped in the salts and is released when temperature conditions are right.
  6. It's unlikely that flowing liquid water, such as we see here on Earth, will be seen. The low atmospheric pressure and temperature of Mars would surely mean that water evaporates very quickly soon after the water ice melts. So what we are seeing are the salts left behind after the water has evaporated. Unfortunately this may not capture the public's imagination of what they expect in terms of water on Mars.
  7. I did, but only because I needed to get up to go to the loo (one of the disadvantages of being the wrong side of 50). Stuck my head out the door and surprise, surprise eclipse was in it's early stages. So went back to bed for another hour!
  8. Lujendra Ojha, also one of the participants, is a graduate student who has been studying gullies on Mars that seemed to indicate past water activity along with Alfred McEwan when at the University of Arizona, see here http://www.sciencemag.org/content/333/6043/740. Ojha continued this work at Georgia Tech, possibly with Mary Beth Wilhelm. So it's possible that they've found water in these gully areas.
  9. Hi Shelby, welcome to SGL from a fellow SGL member located in misty Holmfirth so I can empathise. I had the pleasure of visiting San Francisco at the height of summer in 1980 and witnessed the spectacular Golden Gate bridge shrouded in fog. Beautiful city you live in. Best wishes, Bob
  10. Good point Olly. The panel area decreases as the angle towards the vertical increases as the Sun passes overhead, unless as you say the panels can track the movement of the Sun for optimum area.
  11. Good point Olly. The panel area decreases as the angle towards the vertical increases as the Sun passes overhead, unless as you say the panels can track the movement of the Sun for optimum area.
  12. Ronnie, a. First you will need to calculate the flux (watts/km2) which falls on the Earth's surface from the Sun. You have the Sun's luminosity as 4.0E33 erg/s which is equal to 4.0E26 Watts. Using the distance from the Sun to the Earth of about 1.5E8 km calculate the surface area of a sphere using this distance as the radius. Divide the power from the Sun by the surface area and this will give you the flux at the Earth's surface. You know you need 1 Gigawatt (1E10 Watts) output power from the solar array, but remember it's only 10% efficient so you need more power going into the array, i.e. 1
  13. I had the same problem using a 1.25" EP's in a 2" Lunt wedge with a 102mm wide field refractor. The result was I had insufficient back focus with the 1.25" EP's because too much travel was lost using the 2"/1.25" adaptors. My solution was to use a 28mm 2" Skywatcher long relief EP. You can get low profile adaptors and that may give you sufficient back focus, but if you want to use the 2" wedge then you may need to use 2" EP's. Alternatively, if you want to use 1.25" EP's than as Moriniboy has suggested return it and get the 1.25" wedge instead.
  14. FLO have recently moved to larger premises and according to their recent post (see link below) it is large enough for a showroom, but that apparently is for the future. I'm sure Steve will let us know when. So as Ant says FLO are web based, but ring them if you want to visit. A number of people on SGL have done that. Don't now if anybody would be available at the weekend though. http://stargazerslounge.com/topic/248956-we-are-moving/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.