-
Posts
7,253 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
25
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Uranium235
-
Looks like it might be on for tonight. But its going to be a short tun, by the time I get home I would have been working for 14 hours, no way have I got the legs for a late nighter..lol A couple of hours in Ha should be enough for a quick look to see if everything is as it should be. I'll just point it at Sadr and fire away with reckless abandon...lol... should get something interesting,
-
Unfortunately, I dont know anybody local with such a camera (35mm). And its going to be pretty much "grab and go" short notice sessions. If it satisfies the KAF8300 and APS-C to the point where you really cant tell the difference between the two (in terms of flatness) - theres a high chance it will be good with something larger... but thats just speculation at the moment. Lets just get it up and running, and see whats what. Edit: Dont forget, there have been many claims in the past where the manufacturer states that its good up to 35mm. (or beyond).. but thats rarely been the case. The KAF8300 has a 22mm diagonal, that is the minimum requirement for me. As mentioned in my video, if you cant get those corners youre just wasting data/pixels/time - not so bad if youre just doing one frame (and crop).... but I want to build mosaics.
-
We wont know until these thunderstorms/cloud go away This sits nicely between a 135mm and a Redcat.... and if it works as it should, it could beat both of them in terms of field flatness. I still cant get over how heavy it is, very very solid in construction...lol.. quite like the way the dewshield goes "ding" when you flick it
-
Sky-Watcher 80ED - what parts do I need?
Uranium235 replied to SiD the Turtle's topic in Getting Started With Imaging
The 80ED is about as simple as it gets. Buy the 0.85x FF/FR, screw it to the drawtube (rock solid). Its spacing should be 55mm to the sensor. Use the M48 to T-Ring adaptor, that is always 11mm (for Canon), then the other 44mm is made by the backfocus of your camera = 55mm automatically achieved. If at first you find the focuser a bit lacking in grip, you need to pinch up the tension - I find you have to do that to all stock skywatcher (crayford) focusers. As soon as its able to hold the camera against gravity, you should leave it there (dont do it up too tight). -
Interesting new Astro lens (200mm)
Uranium235 replied to Uranium235's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
Incoming.... watch this space... -
Well, searching for a place to do this has uncovered some smashing imaging spots just over the border in Shropshire - just 15min drive from my house. The 130pds would have been completely unsuitable for this so I opted for the little 50mm Canon. But, being as the image run started before midnight, the Sun still had quite an influence on the images (baaad gradient), so I cropped that bit out and did my best to eliminate what was left. Seem to have gotten both tails now I did set up the guider, but didnt actually use it - I found it easier just for locating the comet (using the guide cam). 40x30s Canon 1000d / Canon 50mm @f3.2
- 1 reply
-
- 6
-
Interesting new Astro lens (200mm)
Uranium235 replied to Uranium235's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
Oh, I'll be looking to run it wide open all the time whats the point in imaging at a speed slower than its maximum? If youre paying for an f4 flatfield, you expect it to be flat at f4 - no messing about required (thats what people want to know). I remember getting the f2 Samyang because it was flat at f2, not because I wanted to slow it down Though it might be worth taking it up a couple of stops, cant see there being that much difference if its already flat over APS-C (at f4)... perhaps slightly tighter stars but thats about it. -
Imaging with the Samyang 135mm f2
Uranium235 replied to Uranium235's topic in Getting Started With Imaging
Going for the squid with ANY telescope/lens/camera is a recipie for insantiy... youve done well to get some of it. Ive known people spending 40+ hours, just to get that little bit. -
Interesting new Astro lens (200mm)
Uranium235 replied to Uranium235's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
Looks like its on guys.... watch this space -
Interesting new Astro lens (200mm)
Uranium235 replied to Uranium235's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
There are a few tests I can do to see how it gets on. 1) Corners (first and foremost) 2) B-mask test (focus on green, then switch between red and blue to see how much movement there is in the diffraction pattern) 3) OSC (use a DSLR to take an image - then split the channels and inspect star size/focus) 4) Reaction to drops in ambient temperature - would be interesting as this lens weighs a whopping 1.8kg 5) Mosaic building capability (it has to be very flat for you to effectively build a mosaic without wasting valuable data) -
Interesting new Astro lens (200mm)
Uranium235 replied to Uranium235's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
Hang on a mo.... we've got some movement.... Been offered a tester for review..... need to run this past management - I'll be back in a bit -
Interesting new Astro lens (200mm)
Uranium235 replied to Uranium235's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
Yes indeed, you will need that 55mm especially if working with something like a QSI camera - which eats up a whopping 35.5mm at minimum (ws version). -
Interesting new Astro lens (200mm)
Uranium235 replied to Uranium235's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
But it's still 55mm (i believe) for those who dont want to use the bayonet system (ie: for ccd/cmos). There should be an option for people (like me) who detest bayonet fittings...lol There does seem to be a thread on the backend of it, but it's not mentioned whether its M48 or T2 (m48 would be more sensible) -
Interesting new Astro lens (200mm)
Uranium235 replied to Uranium235's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
Yep, that's why we've got to sit back and let someone else bite the bullet first 🙂 It's not released yet, so I suppose we wont start seeing any images from consumers until perhaps September. -
Interesting new Astro lens (200mm)
Uranium235 replied to Uranium235's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
Had a response, but no detail as to what its made of. I guess the proof of the pudding will be in the eating - just gotta sit tight and see what develops (pardon the pun).