Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.



  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

68 Excellent

About Handy_Andy

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Location
    Rutland, UK
  1. Not all as we all have crappy spoiled subs so I ditch those, keep the best so that you can add to them later on. You can use them for pictures with data captured on different seasons, or make mosaics with adjacent framed subs in the future
  2. I tend to take raw and jpegs, then using the jpegs as proofs get rid of poor raw files. Organisationally I file them according to target. You could always have a central HDD connected to your router as a data storage hub rather than using online storage all the time
  3. I too have had to stop my avx from turning too far, though it was usually down to me having made a hash of the alignment process when I was first starting out. So double check you are aligning properly and that you start everything from the home position. Correct gps location is also important to consider, if you have the wrong coordinates there then the avx might think portions of the sky are visible. Hope these points give you something to start with at least Clear Skies
  4. http://www.astrokraken.fr/adapter-polemaster-qhyccd-dovetail-star-adventurer-with-l-bracket-a142182870 This might the site, only have a link for polemaster adapter
  5. Go for an articulated screen so 600d onwards, I have the 700d but only because I had one anyway and had it sent off to Juan to have it modified. My profile pic was taken with my modded 700d
  6. Are you dead set on an Avx? Why not consider the skywatcher heq5 pro as an extension tube is already made for it. The heq5 also has a slightly higher payload and can be upgraded with a belt mod for even more accurate tracking. Flo even sell it prefitted if you want it from the off
  7. I love my AVX and get on quite well with it. I didn't get on with the polar scope at all, some weird poses and contortions meant that polar alignment was a lengthy and often painful experience and have opted for QHY's polemaster instead of struggling. In terms of mods I upgraded to the ADM saddle and haven't regretted a penny on it, no marred dovetails +1 to the balancing issue, that can be a nuisance but you get used to the feel of it
  8. I have a deep cycle battery hooked up to a distribution board I made. Went with Phono plugs and sockets with variable resistors so I can lower the current. But you can choose your own plugs and such to suit your power supply. Dew control is top right of my board
  9. I have an 8" edge and made my own dew heater strap with nichrome wire. I made it to draw up to 1amp and that's more than sufficient to keep the dew off with a standard shield. HTH Clear skies
  10. Just a quick fyi on the reducer, it reduces the amount of backfocus from 133mm without to 105mm with it. Just something to keep in mind planning your setup
  11. The choice of adapting your existing finder or buying all new gear is entirely up to how you want to allocate your budget, as I had my finder just lying around I adapted mine and bought the baader guidescope mounting. This just slots into a synta style base. I also made my own dew heater as I kept getting dew after a while. Had the Evoguide been released a few months earlier I would have had that and used it as a travel scope too, but that's the way things go, mine works well as it is so not worth laying extra cash out to have a pretty one. Who can see it in the dark after all?
  12. I use an Altair Astro Lightwave 0.8x reducer/flattener with my ED80 and that works a treat, take a look at those. With your guiding question, I use a 50mm finder as my guidescope and it corrects the AVX a treat when I'm imaging with my ED80.
  13. Someone else with far more experience will no doubt correct me but as I've previously been tempted to look at the hyperstar route and don't think it's the best way to go. The issues that I heard of with it were that with the focal ratio being so fast focusing has to absolutely spot on. Given sct's predilection for mirror flop this can be difficult to achieve. There were questions as I recall regarding the size of the imaging circle with some vignetting. If your determined to image at very small F numbers given you've said you have an NEQ6, you might want to look at Celestron's Rowe Ackermann Astrograph. That has a larger aperture and is designed to operate at F2.2 instead of being modified. Better spending money and getting it right than forcing the wrong equipment. You'll get some better advice in the not too distant future I'm sure but something for you to look into whilst you wait.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.