Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Randalloverby

Members
  • Posts

    266
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

278 Excellent

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    www.randalloverbyphotography.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    Photography, Pro Supercross and Outdoor Pro MX
  • Location
    North Carolina

Recent Profile Visitors

2,174 profile views
  1. Thanks for the replies. Next chance I get I will try a pano. You are right Knobby, trial and error can make you pull your hair out but when it all comes together, its a beautiful thing.?
  2. Sorry, I didn't mean for my response to sound that way. ? The 16-35 2.8 is a great lens but it has so much distortion around the edges. Now that I'm thinking more about it, an overlapping pano may be the best direction to go in. If the weather cooperates with me tonight then I will give it a go. The tracking on the SA has been amazing so far and very portable. Thank you for the reply.
  3. Thanks, I used the Canon 16-35 2.8 lens. The distortion was actually worse, I tried to repair them some in Startools which helped but still not as sharp as the center. Other than buying a prime lens, I'm not sure what else to do.
  4. This is my most recent capture using the Star Adventurer. I have found that this tracking mount is probably one of my better investments into astrophotography. 240sec x8, 3.2 at 800iso, 35mm. Foreground was shot separate and blended in PS.
  5. That gives me hope then cause mine isn't modded either. I am using the CLS clip filter so not sure how that will affect it.
  6. Nice, I thought very seriously of trying for that target but ran out of time. Maybe on my next outing.
  7. Oh wow, is that the Witch Head Nebula in the bottom right and was your camera modded ?
  8. Thanks. Yeah, I use a Manfrotto tripod bag full of sand that I hang from the center column but I still end up bumping or knocking something out of alignment, goofy I guess.
  9. I shot this image of the Monkey Head and Jellyfish Nebula using a 200mm Canon lens. I pushed the exposures to 200 secs but ending up losing more than I kept, with a total of 30mins. I did have a good PA but when moving the camera etc, rechecking it is a absolute must.
  10. It works ! I downloaded and installed the firmware again and I am running custom exposures as I speak. Evidently there was an issue with my original download and I just kept re-installing the same issue over and over. You my man, are a life saver. THANKS !
  11. That is awesome, now we are getting somewhere...mine does not flash at all. If it only flashes after the upgrade then maybe its not updating properly ?
  12. Shelster, that made more sense to me than reading the manual 20 times. What I am not seeing are the flashes or blinks ?
  13. I may end up going in that direction, you mind if I ask which one you use ?
  14. I finally upgraded the firmware on the SA but I still can't get it off of 100 sec exposures. I even followed the video step by step on the astro time-lapse video that StarWatcher has and no change. Is it me or is something just not working here, LOL. Thanks for any help.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.