Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

pblackwell

Members
  • Posts

    154
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pblackwell

  1. 17 hours ago, ONIKKINEN said:

    Consider buying a camera outside of the usual suspects of manufacturers.

    I bought the RisingCam IMX571 sensor colour camera and it works great. Obviously its been cloudy for weeks since i bought it but lots of people are happy with theirs and so am i, and the price is really competitive compared to the monopoly-gang manufacturers like ZWO and QHY who have just decided to ask 2200 euros for these products for no real reasons other than they can.

     

    https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4001359313736.html?spm=a2g0s.9042311.0.0.5b604c4dWaHMUL

     

    Many thanks will take a look 👍🏻

  2. 25 minutes ago, Tenor Viol said:

    I took this last night - that's 70mm 5 seconds at ISO 1600 around midnight. The only crop on it is to make it a square image - so full height, width cut slightly. This is just a basic JPEG- the RAW file is 40mb. I reckon the tail is at least 5 degrees long3BAED150-9685-4D57-98BB-DEA52D09EA13.thumb.jpeg.9e4e856d61c5aef5d3ea2736c59d18fc.jpeg 

    Thanks fo sharing the settings. What a great location to observe!....unlike my back garden when it comes into view around 2am for about 20mins before going behind a tree for an hour!

  3. 33 minutes ago, Aramcheck said:

    I think it'll be too much magnification. The folks who've imaged it in our local soc have either used DLSR's with lenses & either single frames or on a tracking mount - or smart phones attached to binoculars..

    It is quite bright (naked eye visible) and large, pretty much fills the view in 8x42 bins / 102mm refractor.

    I haven't managed to take any proper pics of it, other than with a Compact digital (non DLSR) on a fixed tripod. This is a 5 sec exposure from back garden early Sat. morning along with some Noctilucent clouds.

    Cheers
    Ivor

    a few mins ago.jpg

    Ok thanks. I thought it might be. I’ll also prep my smaller explorer 130m and attach camera to that.

    So about 5 sec exposure? I’ll try 4,5 and 6 secs exposure and see how I get on.

    the camera is so old it doesn’t even have live view so need to look Through the tiny  5/6mm eye viewer which is dam hard! ...you don’t even know if things are in focus lol!🙈

    thanks for your reply it was helpful.

    paul

  4. 12 minutes ago, John said:

    The project has been running since 2015 with the permissions being considered in 2017 and approved towards the end of that year. Worldwide astronomy organisations did raise concerns at the time but the decision was still to go ahead. I believe the project gathered additional impetus when the US military took an interest in it.

    By all means sign the petitions etc but in all honesty I don't see any chance whatsoever in stopping this programme now.

    If like what I saw last night then this is truely  awful and I dread to think what it will be like with 12,000+ of them constantly orbiting 😔

    • Like 1
  5. Hi guys, I’ve actually just seen what I had been reading about I can’t believe it!

    Im in London and from the south west going to the north east about 30mins ago I viewed with the naked eye about 17 satellites moving  in a line in succession.

    these must be those bloody internet satellites (can’t remember the name)

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.