Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

alan4908

Members
  • Posts

    1,457
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by alan4908

  1. Thanks - I'm not at all keen on the Hubble Palette, so I think I shall have a go with just Ha and OIII. I do already have an Astrodon 3nm Ha filter but I don't think I can justify further spending on a NII filter. Alan
  2. Thanks Dave. Have you seen any good hi-resolution NB images which would point me in the direction of which filters to use for the acquisition. I'm currently guessing Ha and OIII. Alan
  3. Thanks - yes, it does look a little bubbly - I think acquiring some narrow band data would help capture a few more details. Alan
  4. NGC7008 is a planetary nebula located in Cygnus about 2800 light years distant and about 1 light year in size. The amateur astronomer Eric Honeycut named it the Fetus Nebula when he viewed it through his 22inch reflector. Planetary Nebula are one of the few astronomical objects that may appear green, so when processing this particular object you have to be careful when eliminating green from your image (eg SNCR green in PI) otherwise it will significantly change the colour balance of the object. Since it is so small and there's not much of interest in the background, I decided to crop it quite aggressively, so that a few details of the nebula can be seen more easily. So, here's an LRGB image consisting of 13 hours integration which was taken with my Esprit 150. Alan LIGHTS: L:26, R:17, G:17, B:18 x 600s, DARKS:30, BIAS:100, FLATS:40 all at -20C.
  5. alan4908

    NGC4725

    From the album: Deep Sky III

    NGC4725 is the brightest member of a galaxy group in the constellation Coma Berenices and is about 40million light years distant and 130,000 light years in diameter. The structure is somewhat unusual, consisting of just one spiral arm which is tightly wound around the core and can be followed for about 1.5 revolutions. The spiral arm consists of dust and gases including bright blue stars and pinkish Ha regions which indicate star forming regions. Towards the center, much older, yellow stars can be seen. The galaxy is classified as a Seyfert Galaxy, indicating that the center contains a supermassive black hole. The smaller galaxy on the right side is NGC4712 is within the galaxy group but is at the much greater distance of about 200million light years. The LRGB image below represents 12 hours integration time and was taken with my Esprit 150.
  6. That is a very impressive image. Alan
  7. Thanks - I was pleased with the amount of detail - this was helped by the creation of a so called "super luminescence" which increased my SNR for the lum without impacting detail. This in turn allowed me to perform a stronger deconvolution, thereby extracting more detail. Alan
  8. NGC4725 is the brightest member of a galaxy group in the constellation Coma Berenices and is about 40million light years distant and 130,000 light years in diameter. The structure is somewhat unusual, consisting of just one spiral arm which is tightly wound around the core and can be followed for about 1.5 revolutions. The spiral arm consists of dust and gases including bright blue stars and pinkish Ha regions which indicate star forming regions. Towards the center, much older, yellow stars can be seen. The galaxy is classified as a Seyfert Galaxy, indicating that the center contains a supermassive black hole. The smaller galaxy on the right side is NGC4712 is within the galaxy group but is at the much greater distance of about 200million light years. The LRGB image below represents 12 hours integration time and was taken with my Esprit 150. Alan LIGHTS: L:21, R:13, G:20, B:18 x 600s; DARKS:30, FLATS:40, BIAS:100 all at -20C.
  9. Hi Adam Whilst I don't have an Esprit 100, I do own an Esprit 150 which is set up for automated imaging using filter offsets. I explored the details of this a couple of years ago and understanding the theory a little more greatly improved my results. So, you might want to take a look at this post:
  10. alan4908

    SH2-115

    From the album: Deep Sky III

    SH2-115 is a faint emission nebula in the Cygnus constellation about 7500 light years distant. It is normally imaged in narrowband, however, since I prefer natural looking colours, I went for a LRGB composition with an Ha blend into the red and lum channels. The image below represents about 17 hours and was taken with my Esprit 150. I encountered an interesting challenge in the processing stage of the above image in that I discovered that I had also acquired high levels of scattered light from an out of field star. These rays appeared in all the Lum, Red and Green subframes. Having analysed the likely candidates in the direction of the rays, led me to the conclusion that the most likely cause was the star Deneb, reflecting off some surface in my scope. I occasionally encounter this problem, but this was extreme, presumably due to the very high relative brightness of Deneb compared to the nebula. On the good news side, the scattered light was not evident in the Ha captured by my 3nm filter and was only just visible in the red data. So, after Pixsinsight and PS manipulation, I think I've managed to reduce this effect to acceptable levels.
  11. alan4908

    NGC3718

    From the album: Deep Sky III

    My first attempt at NGC3718 which lies at a distance of about 49 million light years from Earth. It's a very unusually looking galaxy, featuring a twisted dust lane in the central region. To the right you can also see the companion galaxy NGC3729 which, occurring to radio measurements, appears to be interacting with its larger partner. At the top of the image, Hickson 56 can be seen, a grouping of five small galaxies that are estimated to be about 390 million light years away. The LRGB image represents just under 16 hours and was taken with my Esprit 150.
  12. Thanks Alan Thanks for your detailed comments. In acquiring the image, I did wonder if I could detect some star forming regions, so in acquiring the image, I also decided to try to capture some emission data via my 3nm Astrodon Ha filter. Unfortunately, even after 7.5 hours (15 x 1800s), the resultant stacked Ha image just looked like a grainy version of the stacked red channel. So, unfortunately, no more detail, only noise was revealed. I therefore decided not to use the Ha data. I should point out that I'm not implying that there aren't any star forming regions in M109 - it is just that I didn't detect any On a general point, it is quite interesting trying to compare my image with others, high resolution M109 images seem to be in short supply. Thanks for the comment ! Alan
  13. Thanks for the comment. Yes, I was quite happy with the amount of detail that I managed to acquire. Thanks for the comment. On your blue processing point, I believe the blues are an accurate representation. For instance, take a look at these images from three accomplished astrophotographers: Adam Block - http://www.caelumobservatory.com/obs/m109.html Robert Gendler - http://www.robgendlerastropics.com/M109.html On the small blue stars and the blue tint of the small background galaxies, these also appear accurate - for instance, have a look at this APOD from Bob Franke: http://www.star.ucl.ac.uk/~apod/apod/ap130523.html Thanks Geoff ! Alan
  14. My first attempt at M109, a galaxy located in Ursa Major which is about 55 million light years distant. In the image below you can also see quite a few other background galaxies - the ones marked PGC37553, PGC37700 and PGC37621 have recession velocities very similar to M109 and are classified as dwarf companion galaxies. The LRGB image below represents 16.5 hours integration and was taken with my Esprit 150. Alan M109 M109 (annotated) LIGHTS: L:37, R:21, G:23, B:18 x 600s. DARKS: 30, BIAS:100, FLATS: 40 all at -20C.
  15. Thanks Carole Hi John Yes - masks are interesting objects to experiment with.. In Pixinsight, I found that the free GAME script (http://www.skypixels.at/pixinsight_scripts.html) is very flexible, allowing you to create "elliptically holes" of specific sizes in your black mask at specific locations. Alan
  16. Good luck with your processing, I'm sure you will get there ! By the way, I didn't understand your comment on applying multiple masks simultaneously, could you elaborate ? Alan
  17. Thanks for the comment John I found it quite difficult. The main problem for me was the background and the starfield, rather than the galaxy. Specifically: 1. There are some quite bright stars around the galaxy which if you stretch them at the same level as the galaxy, become too bloated. I resolved this by stretching some of these separately and then blending them into the image. 2. Since I image in non-ideal conditions (eg the UK), I often obtain red halos around blue stars, this arises from the FHWM of the red stack being slightly larger than the blue stack. I resolved this problem by creating a halo mask around the stars in the red channel and then applying an erosion filter to only that channel. I did this in Pixsinight but you can perform the equivalent task in Photoshop. In general, I'd suggest you examine your five results and decide which parts of the image you like and which you don't for each of your five attempts. I sometimes find that processing the main object and the background separately and then blending the results can give a better overall result. Alan
  18. Thanks for the comment Geoff. Thanks - yes, it looks like it has gone through a lot - also the interaction with its companion galaxy is interesting. Thanks - on the cropping front, I did consider a much tighter crop but this time I opted for the interesting object suspended in space look. Thanks Brian Alan
  19. My first attempt at NGC3718 which lies at a distance of about 49 million light years from Earth. It's a very unusually looking galaxy, featuring a twisted dust lane in the central region. To the right you can also see the companion galaxy NGC3729 which, occurring to radio measurements, appears to be interacting with its larger partner. At the top of the image, Hickson 56 can be seen, a grouping of five small galaxies that are estimated to be about 390 million light years away. The LRGB image represents just under 16 hours and was taken with my Esprit 150. LIGHTS: L: 35, R:23, G:20, B:16 x 600s, DARKS:30, BIAS:100, FLATS:40 all at -20C.
  20. I use the freeware version of FocusMax in conjunction with Maxim DL and ACP Expert and find it gives excellent results, so I've never had the need to get the paid version. The main reason I suggest using FocusMax is that it works out the focusing from a defocused position, which helps to combat the effects of seeing. To further reduce the impact of seeing, I'd also recommend you choose the FocusMax option of convergence which takes (say) 5 exposures at the defocused position and attempts to pick the best one. Seeing will also be minimized by picking a focus star near the zenith, since this minimizes the amount of atmospheric distortion. If you want to best possible focus then you should also look at the various FocusMax tutorials and select a focus star and exposure that puts you on the linear part of your camera. It is also quite fast, in my system, it takes a total time of about 80s to achieve focus, with the slower but more accurate option of convergence selected. On the downside of the freeware version, I seem to recall there is an issue with using the FocusMax acquire star feature, this doesn't impact me since I use ACP Expert to select the focus star. Alan
  21. alan4908

    NGC5466

    Thanks for the comment Alan
  22. alan4908

    NGC5466

    From the album: Deep Sky III

    Located in the constellation Bootes, approximately 52000 light years from Earth, lies the globular cluster NGC 5466. It is designated as a class XII cluster, meaning that it has relatively non-concentrated stars towards the core compared to a class I cluster. This last fact starting me wondering if my scope would be able to resolve the "gaps" in the central core...... note also the various background galaxies. The LRGB image below was taken with my Esprit 150 and represents just over 9 hours integration time.
  23. alan4908

    IC410

    From the album: Deep Sky III

    My first attempt at the Tadpole Nebula (IC410). Located in the Auriga constellation, the nebula is about 12000 light years distant and is approx 100 light years across. The red tadpole like objects are believed to be about 10 light years across and consist of dust and gas that have been shaped by stellar winds. The nebula also contains an open cluster (NGC1893) that contains newly born stars that are estimated to be only 4 million years old (in the center of the image and a little to the right). Since I prefer natural looking colours, on the acquisition side, I decided to go for an LRGB image with the details enhanced with some narrowband Ha data. The image was taken with my Esprit 150 and represents 16 hours integration time.
  24. alan4908

    M37 (2020)

    From the album: Deep Sky III

    The open cluster M37 contains almost 2000 stars and is spread across 20 light years. Most of the stars are young blue/white but it also contains red giant orange suns which provide considerable colour contrast. I first imaged M37 a couple of years ago but I decided to add to the data since I was never entirely happy about the quality of the some of the sub-frames. I also decided to try out some of my newly learnt stellar processing techniques to improve the data which I describe below for anyone that might be interested. Since I often image in non-ideal conditions, I sometimes find that the red stacked channel has a larger FWHM values than the blue or green channels, if I combine this data to obtain an RGB image. the result is a red fringe around the stars. For blue stars, this is particularly apparent and creates magenta halos. This time, I decided to shrink the red channel via a ring mask using PI's erosion filter. The ring mask protects the star core, minimizing damage and core dimming. The main issue is generating a good ring mask which captures the majority of the red fringing. After watching one of the Adam Block's Pixinsight's tutorials ( https://adamblockstudios.com/) on how to de-emphase stars, I decided to apply a technique he recommends. Basically, you first create a star mask which includes all the stars and all the halos. This mask should be white across the star and halo and slightly feathered around the edges. Having done this, you then subtract from this the Red channel lum information to create the ring mask. The reason this creates an accurate ring mask is that the lum data contains accurate information on how the light profile various from the stars center. So, for example, at the stars core, the star mask will be close to 1 (in PI everything is normalised to 1), whilst the lum information will also be close to 1, so if you subtract one from the other you end up with something that is close to 0 (eg black) at the core. Thus, at the core you will be protecting the star's core almost 100%. Outside of the star mask (eg outside of the halos) you will have 0, whilst in the lum channel you might have 0.2 (say representing a non-stellar structure), if you subtract 0.2 from 0 you get 0, since you cannot have negative values in PI, so outside the star mask the ring mask will be 0 eg black. Within the halo, the ring mask will mimic the stars halo hence generating an accurate ring mask. The LRGB image below was taken with my Esprit 150 and represents just over 15 hours integration time.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.